Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm...... adagena naanna one naa ne!
Why dont they release the meta data of the pics to support their claim? If meta data is released, we can find whthr it is the same camera. Also a single photo did nt come from gove
No one had the motives except SLA.So u cant prove SLA killed the boy.
Soldiers can and will kill boys as long as they hold a gun targetting u at battlefront. Btwn u FAILED to prove SLA killed the boy.
How is ur comment related to my comment. Were u trying for an opportunity to say indian soldiers have to fight in cold enviros? After all it was u being babish here crying for civilian deaths. That is why I told u to grow up. Dont get disheartened. Civillian deaths do happen and normal in a war. It becomes a crime only they are deliberately targetted. have no idea abt humantarian laws? Well I can understand.
But UN doesnt care abt CH4 video. Why is that? Cos lack of evidences to make a proper claim.
But u previously said the resolution is abt CH4 video and war crimes. So this means u accept u were wrong and being stupid
I saw and didnt see any relation. So dont be arrogant and tell us how it relates. Will u darling?
So TN police or people cant control it?
So u accept u make things difficult for SL to do reconciliation? Are u proud of that? Isnt it contradictory u speak for it in other posts and do something else.
Creating havoc is anyones ability nothing to be proud in it. After all where did I say that?
So GOSL is responsible for LTTE killing people? U people have a remarkable ability of being a complete idiot!
GOSL provided safe package that is why many left (300000+). On 13/14 April 2009 GOSL issued a unilateral ceasefire for remaining civilians to come to government side but LTTE held them at gun point and used that time to build defences to delay SLA advances. Talk abt some thing u knw.
LTTE shot at the ones who fled. There are eyewitnesses, and HR reports.
When u start war u lose peace. U cant have it both ways. And it is not ur ethnic people they are lankan people.
What interests? Are u threatening us? India stopped supporting LTTE or seperatism for a reason. That is still there. I told u earlier we have our own trump cards. After all SL n Ind have gud relations so ind gove see no reason to go against SL and we too have none. u did it last time too, what effect?
There is noithing brilliant abt Lankans in that comment but again u failing to understand that no surprise! Do u really knw what that motion is abt? U laughing stock! U really want me to believe dead bodies of LTTE cadres to be bodies of civilians?
I didnt oppose u honey bunny. I said urs is not news at all. It is known by every1. Go back and see wht u said earlier. That might help u from this embarrassment.
Why should I provide any source when I allege no case? It is the one who accuses who should bring sources not vise versa u idiot.
The same reason Indian tamils come to SL
Do u think countries pay hard cash before buying foreign stuff? Do u think it is like u going to a nearest shop and buying dosai or whtever paying hard cash? never have any experience or knwlege on import export? I pity u!
So we bought radar equipment. Whats wrong in it? Actually the indian radar was not satisfactory we moved on to chinese ones when we use chinese ones u ppl complain, when we use indian ones u ppl still complain. Funny stuff!
SL intelligence and Indian intelligence coordinated with each other. It is not something new. Training is not a secret, it is in papers everywhere. And it is mainly as a cooperation betwn two countries. Actually we did it showing TN middle finger India provided some info on LTTE routes our navy finished them off.
Yes one have to read a lot, not a single piece.
The Way Forward | B. Raman
Btwn this is written by B.Raman who was in IA and RAW. I guess he has more credentials than ur someone srivastav.
The Way Forward
The unhappiness in Sri Lanka over the Indian vote in favour of the resolution in the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on the question of the human rights of the Sri Lankan Tamils--action in respect of past violations during the counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency operations against the LTTE and to safeguard their human rights in future in the form of a political solution to the grievances and aspirations of the Tamils-- is understandable.
This unhappiness is unlikely to turn into bitterness. Even in the past, the Sinhalese were unhappy over what they perceived as the Indian support to the LTTE in the years before its assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in May 1991. This unhappiness never turned into bitterness and hatred for India.
Anyone who knows Sri Lanka and the Sinhalese well would be aware of their genuine goodwill for India. There were instances in the past when Sri Lankan governments had taken steps which were detrimental to Indian interests. A typical example was before the 1971 India-Pakistan war when they allowed Pakistani Air Force planes carrying men and supplies to East Pakistan to refuel in Sri Lankan airports. When Indira Gandhi strongly objected to this, they discontinued it.
Some lessons abt diplomacy,
Speeches by diplomats are not mere speeches on an occasion. It is done to convey a signal to a certain party. This is the Pakistani way of doing that. The aim may have been to convince the Indian gov they do have excellent relationship with Lanka.
But u boasted abt bloodbath while acting like anti terrorism. U cant take back ur words btwn is it a threat? SL have good relationship with india it is just TN being a thorn.
Yes our leadership, diplomacy, war strategy, commitment and bravey, dedication everything are needed
But we made sure India wont be able to throw the weight behind LTTE. We could win and won without indias support it was LTTE which was defeated without indias support.
Thank you for confirming TN is like tribal areas in pakistan ..however lanka consider india to be a friendly country, so SLG may have been reluctant to have a travel advisory on india. Not every 1 in India is an idiot like u.
Thank u for accpeting ur stooges. But u couldnt do the same in SL for the past 30 yrs. That says something right? Indian army found SL condition extremely difficult having a casualty rate of 400 per week (the highest in indian history). SL is not Pakistan.
We have our own trump cards and india knows it very well, though u are unaware of it. Do u knw the contents of the resolution?
But always gives a non related answer. In his comment Skyline mentioned SLA as the one who gave refuge and protection for Prabhakarans parents. Then u mistook it as IA and went on boasting. Normally a sensible person would read the comment again if faced with such a situ, seems like u rn't one like that.
however lanka consider india to be a friendly country, so SLG may have been reluctant to have a travel advisory on india.
But kashmir has nt been used to bring resolution in UN. Why should SL be singled out? SL is one of the last countries to be quetioned by UN. No one has a right to point at SL. Also the war in SL is over while violence in Kashmir is continuing. I saw in a different thread this man make some derogatory remarks against a certain religion. Wonder why the mod are keeping him still.
you accepted u re
Why dont u answer my qn? How do u deduce the killer of the child with two photographs where one is a live child and the other is a dead body? Why CH4 is reluctant to release meta data of photos? U are NOT answering this.
What are those evidence? I ask u again how is US resolution related to evidence? I knw u have difficulty in comprehension, so I l answer it for u. The resolution is abt implementing the LLRC and CH4 video has no connection with that.
You ask the same qn again when it is not answered first time, not when ure a stupid Pls take a class to develop ur comprehension abilities and english.
U dont have a right to push anything on us just because ur ethnic populace live here, or just because u have interest in our issues. You can influence us but not force us. That is exactly what GOI is telling u which ur ppl find hard to grasp. The reality is Lankan gov wouldnt care for two hoots how much u dance in ur streets or immerse ur self in petrol.
Lanka and India are two countries, just because u speak tamil and some of us speak tamil doesnt make u eligible to meddle in our affairs. U re an indian the tamils here are lankan. Actually Tamils here consider themselves to be different from ur lot.
If u want to keep prestige then act like some adults without throwing stones at others. It is that simple. SLG declare travel advisory to any place they think that is unsafe to Lankans. If u dont want to be labelled as that then act like that. I told u once y these lankan catholics visit Tamil nadu. I guess I m correct when I say u dont read before u reply. I will visit tamil nadu if I want, we arent scared. But we dont want our poor devotees harmed. When SLG issued travel advisory it was GOI requested to lift it promising to provide safety. So it is ur states failure.
Also I heard SLG is starting to strengthen its defence network in TN so dont think we ll have problem any longer Also we ve seen many indian tamils in SL both tourists and employees. So be mindful.
I am sorry if u dont knw much abt TN, but here in SL the last refuge of drug dealers and underworld gangs is TN. U attract very nice people, dont u think.
Expect worse when Modi/BJP come into office.
A Modi/BJP victory will take Indian diplomacy back 50 years.
too longer to read...answer! so I'll answer to your major points.
My stance on devolution never change. Devolution should not be based on one ethnic or religion or region. That's it.
Where have I said Sinhalese cant live in these areas? It is the power devolution I am talking abt. Also I wonder how many Sinhalese would like to go to these areas abandoning their traditional villages, unless economic conditions forced them to.Every province should have a same system, just like we have now. Sinhalese also living in these areas, why you forget them in that solution you're mentioning?
Sinhalese too joined in a different stage no. SL is the native land of Sinhalese, tamils, SL moors and burgher, veddha. In south Sinhala civilization flourished while in north Tamil did. Every one is a native.Entire island is native land of Sinhalese. Different races joined to our society in different stages..No one can deny rights of Sinhalese any where in the island.
Its not like singing a song, u sing the anthem with emotions and love and pride of ur country. When u sing it with a totally alien lang u dont feel it. The thing is Tamil has a long history in the island as much as Sinhalese language. So it is totally acceptable to have an anthem in two languages. Tamils are NOT recent immigrants who joined later.Ape aya hindi sindu kiyanne, hindi danagenada? demala sindu kiyanne demala danegenada? Sinhala kiyanne Sinhalayenge language eka unata lankawe vadi pirisakata puluwan language eka.
there is an Indian Tamil national anthem. u can google it.Indian Tamil national anthem eka mokada kiyala dana ganna kamathie. mama nam ahala na.
haven't taken your driving licence yet?
Never have seen UN meeting or something? We do use these methods, we have to improve all 3 language usage more and more.
All the comments of yours based on North and East provinces. dude, rest of Tamil and Moor community does not face any issue? or all their issues get solved when North & East provinces Tamils get power devolution? lol
patalava ganna epa, rate identity eka majority eke identity eken thamai pilibibu wenne. ae ae community walata identity thiyenava namuth rate identity eka Sinhala buddhists kiyana eka wenne me rata mulika samajaya e aya nisa. Sinhala/sinhalese kiyanne lankavata vitharak unique una jathiyak, sinhalayo wena rataka jeevath una paliyata unge culture ekata unique wenne na ban.
(I'm lazy to reply for too longer comments.)
I want to know something from Indian members. India has different national anthems?
You should understand that it was the same yellow robed thugs that went to Mavila aru to protest against LTTE actions, it was the same yellow robed thugs that went to Monkey-bridge to protest the illegal LTTE camps based their. It is the same yellow robed thugs that created the resolute ideology to give fight back to end LTTE. It was the same yellow robed thugs who went to Vavuniya during the notorious Wanni debacle to chant pirith. So Mr.Gibbs get your facts correct.
Sri Lankan identity is Buddhism. SL shaped itself and Sinhalese developed their culture around Buddhism. So their is no issue in calling Sri Lanka is a Buddhist country.
Their is no difference races in SL (maybe I don't know what Muslims think about themselves). All people in SL share same genes. We are only separated by cultures.
Indians accepted Bengali as the language of national anthem because it was composed by a renown Bengali poet IMO. Not because they are so secular that they tolerate everything. And furthermore Indians aren't divided on linguistic lines as Sri Lankans. Therefore they can BE A INDIAN as anywhere else in the world. I think some Indian member could shed some light on this issue.
Our national anthem is composed by a Sinhalese poet hence the national anthem is in Sinhalese, just like India. Then why is this fuss?
So u believe we won the war because monks chanted pirith, went to protest at mavil aru? We won because of our army and MR, GR and SF. Do u really believe gov waited until monks go and protest in mavil aru to go to war? Gov has been getting ready for war. SF and GR made the defence and military ready and MR and BR made the international forces read. Once the military and diplomatic fronts were made ready they went to war. Mavil Aru was just an excuse. I know monks try to use the war victory for their own advantages. That is to deceive the gullible public like u.
The soldiers in battle front did far more service than a monk with a placard.
SL began in 1948. The country that began in 48 is a country of many communities. Dont relate pre existing historical conditions. There were many Buddhist kingdoms in SL, also hindu kingdoms. Once the country got independent it is a new country of S/T/M/B. Sri Lanka is not a Buddhist country, it is a multi religious country. Not sure? Have a walk around SL.
By race I meant the tamil, Sinhala, moor cos we were discussing it Also Muslim is not a race. Moor is a race.
Sri Lanka is the umbrella identity of many religions and ethnicities. If to remain as one Sri Lankan identity should reflect all ethnicities and be all inclusive. Naththam venveema thamai. Kawada hari lankawa dekata kadanne koti nemei ogollo wage Sinhala ayama thamai.
NO. It is by power devolution that several linguistic people can be united.
Where have I said Sinhalese cant live in these areas? It is the power devolution I am talking abt. Also I wonder how many Sinhalese would like to go to these areas abandoning their traditional villages, unless economic conditions forced them to.
Sinhalese too joined in a different stage no. SL is the native land of Sinhalese, tamils, SL moors and burgher, veddha. In south Sinhala civilization flourished while in north Tamil did. Every one is a native.
Just because Sinhalese are unique in SL, it doesnt give them a monopoly on SL.
Who readied the people to vote for Mahinda? Who readied the people for the war? You have clearly stated that "SF and GR made the defence and military ready and MR and BR made the international forces read." But you failed to mention who made the general public ready for the war. The monks may not have 100% responsible but they played a vital role. At least accept it.
And do you think chanting pirith at a battlefield is a small thing? Dude you should understand that it was this pirith that saved Vavuniya in 1999/2000.
SL is began in '48? What the F.. are you talking about? Bugger listen you may want to forget the past. But I don't because there is no future without the past.
Accept the reality. I don't want my country to be like Thailand. Understand.
That's because those people in India have a historical relationship to India. But in SL it is not the case. The majority of Tamils are recent arrivals from India as well as other minority ethancities. If this is the case Sri Lankans living in Melbourne should have a separate political body to govern themselves.