What's new

Sri Lanka to buy defence equipments from Pakistan

sri lankanes are more intelligent then indians so they never buy junk again

Dude, shut up.

And paktribune copied it as it is !!!
Which indian source are you referring to?

http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/3892

This is the original article. PakTribune didn't copy it. Now this is the second time your humiliated about the news sources, once in the Indian soldier shot another soldier, and now in this thread.

Keep it cool. :coffee:
 
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/3892

This is the original article. PakTribune didn't copy it. Now this is the second time your humiliated about the news sources, once in the Indian soldier shot another soldier, and now in this thread.

Keep it cool. :coffee:

Due who said it was copied, Me or Mark Sein ??

Neo posted the paktribune link for which mark sein said

The original article was printed by an Indian source by an Indian writer.

And i replied

And paktribune copied it as it is !!!
Which indian source are you referring to?

And also have a look here,
https://defence.pk/forums/showpost.php?p=41783&postcount=9.

You said it was a tamil website?Which website were you referring to?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Due who said it was copied, Me or Mark Sein ??

You! As stated, "paktribune copied it as it is !!!". Refer to the above posts.


Neo posted the paktribune link for which mark sein said

Neo posted the topic. Mark Sein refered to me when i said about the South Asian Thailand website, which is tamil owned, spreading bullshit about equipment from Ukraine, scandals, kickbacks, etc. Also, do note that PakTribune doesn't mentions the author. The author is in disguise. Anybody can publish @ PakTribune.
 
You! As stated, "paktribune copied it as it is !!!". Refer to the above posts.
Neo posted the topic. Mark Sein refered to me when i said about the South Asian Thailand website, which is tamil owned, spreading bullshit about equipment from Ukraine, scandals, kickbacks, etc. Also, do note that PakTribune doesn't mentions the author. The author is in disguise. Anybody can publish @ PakTribune.

So thats all abt paktribune some sort of a third rate copy paste web portal.If so then why did Neo find it credible enough to quote it and start a thread.

My comment "pak tribune copied it as it is" was when he said "original was a indian news article".

What do you mean when somebody says original was? It means the one which he is referring to is a duplicate.
 
So thats all abt paktribune some sort of a third rate copy paste web portal.If so then why did Neo find it credible enough to quote it and start a thread.

My comment "pak tribune copied it as it is" was when he said "original was a indian news article".

What do you mean when somebody says original was? It means the one which he is referring to is a duplicate.

PakTribune is not the copy & paste site, some sites have the rights to publish the material again like we and other defence sites do. PakTribune doesn't copy, rather the authors publish their materials and the work gets reviewed before submission, but of course the work can be based on the other news sources like all the news do, and like i mentioned since the PakTribune article doesn't have an author, it could pretty much be based on the original news by the Thailand website.
 
PakTribune is not the copy & paste site, some sites have the rights to publish the material again like we and other defence sites do. PakTribune doesn't copy, rather the authors publish their materials and the work gets reviewed before submission, but of course the work can be based on the other news sources like all the news do, and like i mentioned since the PakTribune article doesn't have an author, it could pretty much be based on the original news by the Thailand website.

But then they do verify whats written over there,right?

If so then how can you rubbish the asian tribune article as bullshit?

South Asian Thailand website, which is tamil owned, spreading bullshit about equipment from Ukraine, scandals, kickbacks, etc.
 
But then they do verify whats written over there,right?

If so then how can you rubbish the asian tribune article as bullshit?

Verification is not needed. They want to generate business.

As for the second statement, read my earlier post.

https://defence.pk/forums/showpost.php?p=41777&postcount=7

If you need more input, i will be able to tell you which weapons were transfered, where they were made, and what is their origin.
 
Last edited:
The article states about kick backs and faulty items.

Do you have anything to prove that wrong?

Which institution/board/commission audits these deals in Pakistan?
 
So you mean to say they are not going to buy from pakistan again.

no you not understand properly it means pakistani weapon are not junk like russian one which india continu to buy.sri lankan trust in pakistan defence industry that why i call them more intelligent then indian.2nd thing last year pakistan arm export rise up to 200 mil.dollar which mean not only sri lanka but other countries intressed in our defence products quality
 
The article states about kick backs and faulty items.

Do you have anything to prove that wrong?

Which institution/board/commission audits these deals in Pakistan?
So who are the Asian Tribune's sources? The "sources" do not cut it. So how can they validate their claims?

"According to a report"
"According to knowledgeable sources"

Not exactly very credible now is it?
 
So who are the Asian Tribune's sources? The "sources" do not cut it. So how can they validate their claims?

"According to a report"
"According to knowledgeable sources"

Not exactly very credible now is it?

Pak tribune also stated the same about faulty items and kick backs.

Who audits these books of Accounts in Pakistan?
 
hmmmmm let me answer u all abt paktribune:)
well all my dears here as my dearest is away ;)

ok well paktribune dosnt copy and past infact its the busiest news portal and let me come back tommorrow and i will name some of the most powerfull depts from US rely on information from paktribune.
at the moment its Election site is at number 5 on the googles and on number 2 at the yahoo:)
i wud post the exect names of the US depts that rely on its news and also consider it the authentic.
the traffice on the site is so heavy that the site sufferes alot and it is often down for maintainance.

and last but not the least few months back the Indians hacked the site due to its popularity:) its forums were also infected by the hackers, they steal the pass words of all the members thn the site upgarded the softwarfes and all the stuff to tougher one :)
 
hmmmmm let me answer u all abt paktribune:)
well all my dears here as my dearest is away ;)

ok well paktribune dosnt copy and past infact its the busiest news portal and let me come back tommorrow and i will name some of the most powerfull depts from US rely on information from paktribune.
at the moment its Election site is at number 5 on the googles and on number 2 at the yahoo:)
i wud post the exect names of the US depts that rely on its news and also consider it the authentic.
the traffice on the site is so heavy that the site sufferes alot and it is often down for maintainance.

and last but not the least few months back the Indians hacked the site due to its popularity its forums were also infected by the hackers, they steal the pass words of all the members thn the site upgarded the softwarfes and all the stuff to tougher one

:shocked: Did'nt know about this before......, dont get me wrong i do visit the site quite regularly, its alright, but i cant say its very special or perhaps we dont get the news or info with all its extra spices there like other news or info sites do. biggest example... jang or Khabrain.

But its shocking that indians hacked the site. They know so many different ways to sneak through:crazy2:
 
Back
Top Bottom