Sporadic anti Xi protests emerge in China

[flowerfan2020]

I rather have one long term good dictatorship leader than have many different of bad leadership.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

I am a simple man, and have concerns with Xi. Who doesn't when a precedent is broken? Back in 2017 and 2013 I posted about this too.

However, when I see that all the opponents to Xi are either 1. proven and self admitted traitors 2. foreign opponents 3. religious or political extremists, my concern about Xi declines rapidly.

 

[thewayoftheworld]

How can the Chinese not support their government when the whole of the Western world is hell-bent on destroying Chinese prosperity and hampering its development? It is an official US government policy to knock China down and slow it growth.

 

[Paul2]

I was in China when Jiang was still in office, I stayed in China until end of 2008 when Hu was in charge. The corruption level in the whole city of Shenzhen, including the local party members appointed as factory manager to our factory were all so openly corrupt. Triad and gangsters from Hunan and Sichuan had more power than the local police.

A common example, you need to present expensive gifts to headmasters to get in all levels of schools among many common ways to get good relationships which the West used the term "guanxi" as China specific term for corruption. As for our factory, we have different ways of having good "guanxi" with our party member factory manager as the middleman, to liase with local party leaders.

The CCP of this period may be powerful and efficient, but it was rotten to the core, from top leadership to local village party members. 上梁不正下梁歪.

If Xi did not go after the corrupted nationwide, China would go as Gordon Chang's China Collapse prediction.

So you been in SZ when it was still walled off?

I have to say not a single bad actor from that time ever went to jail, it's just they been buried by the mass of new arrivals.

Guangzhou is a different story, but so far only Wan and his immediate retinue went to jail since they were the most audacious of the bunch. Ones who never showed political ambitions are still sitting in the city administration, some even promoted.

 

[Brainsucker]

I rather have one long term good dictatorship leader than have many different of bad leadership.

A one long term dictactorship leader is dangerous. Even if he's good and clean. Simply because the longer he stay in his throne, the worse political turmoil will happen when he fall. Indonesia is the best example for this. For our first and second presidents, Soekarno and Soeharto who rules for decades in Indonesia; when they fall from power, Indonesia went into political turmoil and chaotic situation.

The reason is simple. Because when somebody rules too long, he will gain more and more political opponents. And when those opponents can't get the power by the peaceful meaning, There are a lot of variable that can destroy your country.

So can China afford a political turmoil and chaotic situation, when they have to stay stable and move forward like now?

 

[aziqbal]

Why you have to troll everything? you contribute nothing to this forum but trolling.

So this is not true

https://twitter.com/x/status/1610423131969126402

 

[beijingwalker]

So this is not true

https://twitter.com/x/status/1610423131969126402

In Beijing all people must be cremated after they die, only Muslims can be exempted from this law and Government reimburse lots of money for Muslim funerals which causes lots of resentment among Han Chinese.

Google translate:
Non-Muslim tombs cost up to 250,000 yuan per square meter, and Muslim tombs cost 400 yuan per square meter. Beijing allocated 390 mu (260,000 square meters) of land free of charge under Beijing's extremely tight land conditions, and allocated 830 million yuan to expand the Muslim cemetery. Every deceased Muslim who is buried in a Muslim cemetery enjoys a subsidy of 120,000 yuan ($17,650 ). Artificially created inequality must be eliminated!

 

[aziqbal]

In Beijing all people must be cremated after they die, only Muslims can be exempted from this law and Government reimburse lots of money for Muslim funerals which causes lots of resentment among Han Chinese.

View attachment 910138

Google translate:
Non-Muslim tombs cost up to 250,000 yuan per square meter, and Muslim tombs cost 400 yuan per square meter. Beijing allocated 390 mu (260,000 square meters) of land free of charge under Beijing's extremely tight land conditions, and allocated 830 million yuan to expand the Muslim cemetery. Every deceased Muslim who is buried in a Muslim cemetery enjoys a subsidy of 120,000 yuan ($17,650 ). Artificially created inequality must be eliminated!

fake actors we all know China uses fake propaganda

look at this, this is how COVID started and you used to laugh at British for dying now pay the price our turn to laugh at China

https://twitter.com/x/status/1609992044038033410

 

[zectech]

Chinese need to read the tale of Hansel and Gretel.

China success of 40 years was the fattening of Hansel and Gretel by the Anglo-Americans. The intent was never to make China a world power. The goal was to fatten China, then slaughter it.

The three main reasons the Chinese were used for. First, wall street profits and the ability to make money from jobs in China, Chinese businesses owned by Western investors, ship the goods to the West, have huge profits. This was the overt reason for 40 years of success in China. "You make money, Oligarchs make money". Second, was the deadening of Europe. Chinese point out that Europe is a dying continent. That was the script, move jobs and production from political enemies, Germany, Italy and elsewhere. Starve enemies of Washington, get that food to fatten China. Have GDP low in Europe. Fatten China, take out fattened China with Trump, later. While Chinese would refuse to admit, before the USA "terrorist enemy of Muslims", the FBI/cia had the enemy of anti-US government whites. So keeping wages low in the USA, and keeping anti-government whites from success was a goal in the ship jobs to China.

The third reason was inflation, China making goods at low cost, wall street could still have high margin goods at low prices to keep down inflation. Saving the dollar from inflation and gold and silver prices low, was one of the ways China was used.

So when Chinese blame whitey in Europe for Trump, is the same as blaming the staved dying low growth areas for success shipped to a fatten China. Which the Anglo-Americans plan to slaughter. Anglo-Americans, that want to slaughter China, back China when Chinese blame Whitey Germans and Whitey Ukrainians. China is not going after the plotters that sought to fatten than slaughter China.

With China supporting Putin and Russia, China has no friends in Europe, except for some Trumpers such as Orban and Putin. Europe supported the success of China and trade, before, during and after Trump. EU hated Trump. UK disliked the EU for hating Trump. UK did Putin-backed Brexit for Trump.

China "to have revenge against Trump", backed the plan of a Trump war on Europe. Backed the blaming of dying Europe for Anglo-American crimes. Dying and in debt from financial crisis of the USA, bioweapon attack by Trump. And for many other plots from Washington. China believes the lies of Putin and Trump and Tucker Carlson. These three cia trolls want to see China fattened and slaughtered. Strange company that China keeps.

NATO is about defending Europe from a Russian invasion. China decades ago would not have rejected an alliance with the USA against an Imperialist militaristic Japan. Europe was defeated in WWII by the USA and Russians. USA was used to kick out the Russians. Not much different than China using Americans to kick out Japanese. Trump opposes the idea of NATO, does not want to defend Europe from buddy Putin.

China is persona non grata in Europe. Had the EU supported Trump (Trump plotted to destroy the EU) against China IN A TRUMP WAR. That is how we feel about pro-Trumper Putin China. China supports the Trump War on Europe to destroy the EU. Every person with a working brain can see this war was planned in cia boardrooms.

China is on the side of Pompeo, Trump and Tucker.

 

[zectech]

In not building up militarily, China hastens doom and perhaps conflict with Washington. In building up militarily, China hastens conflict with Washington.

Europe has dealt with internal and external crisis from the US. Similar to China. Strange that China was first to draw blood on Europe in siding with Trump, in the cias first Trump war.