Speech of Abul Kalam Azad about separation of Indo-Pak.

[Karachiite]

I agree if partition didn't happen there wouldn't be a Kashmir issue and the river disputes but it was needed. Quaid e Azam originally wanted a united India but Nehru was the bone in the kebab. Congress did not want to share their powers with anyone else, Jinnah wanted to safeguard the rights of Muslims.

 

[mehboobkz]

Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, a so-called 'liberal' and 'secular' Muslim, led a campaign against 'Vande Maataram' on the grounds that it was 'anti-Islamic'. He had opposed the partition of India and Jawaharlal Nehru was quick to declare him 'a great nationalist leader', but the Maulana in his book "India Wins Freedom" has discussed the reason for his opposition. He was of the opinion that the creation of a separate Muslim state would divide the Muslim population and India would have fewer number of Muslims, thus dealing a blow to the process of Islamization of India, hence the opposition.

 

[T-Faz]

Did Jinnah Want Pakistan? | Pak Tea House

Pakistan was only meant to be province within the federal state of India. It was used as a means to secure rights for the Muslims but when Nehru and Gandhi did not budge, Pakistan was created.

Otherwise, it was Jinnah who would have been the first leader of United India.

 

[American Pakistani]

Sir Jinnah was not responsible for partition & nor Gandhi Sir was it was only Nehru's hatdharmi, Pakistan was meant to be autonomous part all was spoiled by Nehru, when he didnt care for Muslims so obviously Muslims had to care for themselves. & i would also like to request Indian friends to forget the past what ever happen, live peacefully with Pakistan solve all kind of issues & disputes & if you guys want merger with Pakistan than ask your govt, so may be soon it becomes one country again under the name of Pakistan( I dont think you guys had a prob with Pakistan name as it means PAK) our Pakistani flag could add wheel on its white part, Srinagar could be made capital as Kashmiris have suffered too much, Bollywood can be merge with Lollywood which is headquartered in Lahore. I dont think its a bad idea, what say

 

[Yeti]

Dont agree Jinnah did not want Pakistan he said himself we are 2 diffrent people with diffrent cultures etc he wanted a muslim state for sure.

 

[American Pakistani]

Dont agree Jinnah did not want Pakistan he said himself we are 2 diffrent people with diffrent cultures etc he wanted a muslim state for sure.

Yup he want Pakistan but as autonomous state, even your former minister LK Advani wrote this fact.

 

[Yeti]

Yup he want Pakistan but as autonomous state, even your former minister LK Advani wrote this fact.

I never knew that

 

[Rafi]

Pakistanis need to understand that there was a wholesome country or atleast the struggle for a united Hindustan before Pakistan was even a figment of anyone's imagination. You have a seperate country, accepted. It doesnt mean that you have to forget that you were a result of "Partition" and most of it was politically motivated. Any idealogy never demands a seperation with bloodshed! do they?

There was no partition as such my friend, we achieved independence as a country from the British

 

[WAR-rior]

I agree if partition didn't happen there wouldn't be a Kashmir issue and the river disputes but it was needed. Quaid e Azam originally wanted a united India but Nehru was the bone in the kebab. Congress did not want to share their powers with anyone else, Jinnah wanted to safeguard the rights of Muslims.

Thats why i say it was a skeptical attitude of jinnah nothing else. partitioning a country is never the solution..it never was it never will be...the result is in front of u.....

just suffering form skepticism doesnt justify things. or does it ? definately not.

jinnah wasnt a visionary.....he took consensus of only 20 odd % of muslims who were workers of muslim leauge.....low down south in hyderabad no one knew what jinnah was upto.

he didnt calculate what it wud mean for crores of ppl to migrate from 1 place to other just on da basis of decision of some thousands of mulims.

if a great leader he sud have anticipated the consequences a partition brings..india isnt the first to be partitioned.....

so many negetives completely ignored just on the basis of what ? SKEPTICISM ? rationality doesnt justify this !

even today pakistanis try to justify their existence on da basis of india being pro hindu and anti muslims and their justification is 2 off incidents which occured 44 years after the partition....

enough for so much of attempt ?

Tell me which party ruled the india for 60+ decades?

Pro Hindu fundamentalist BJP or Pro secularism Congress ?

Answer this !

Cmon guyz...SYNCRETISM is the essence, history and soul of Indian subcontinent....

Just a hint of suspicion by a single person......some thousands staged protest and even riots for that support and 10 - 20 million ppl have to accept it forcefully...(many hindus in pakistan and muslims in india didnt want to leave their ancestral land)

WAS IT ALL WORTH !

(@MOD : I know u guys dont like to discuss this but its good to clear doubts from both sides)

 

[WAR-rior]

Sir Jinnah was not responsible for partition & nor Gandhi Sir was it was only Nehru's hatdharmi, Pakistan was meant to be autonomous part all was spoiled by Nehru, when he didnt care for Muslims so obviously Muslims had to care for themselves. & i would also like to request Indian friends to forget the past what ever happen, live peacefully with Pakistan solve all kind of issues & disputes & if you guys want merger with Pakistan than ask your govt, so may be soon it becomes one country again under the name of Pakistan( I dont think you guys had a prob with Pakistan name as it means PAK) our Pakistani flag could add wheel on its white part, Srinagar could be made capital as Kashmiris have suffered too much, Bollywood can be merge with Lollywood which is headquartered in Lahore. I dont think its a bad idea, what say

ohh......i liked ur offer !

by da way are u zaid hameed fan ?

plz tell us , so that we can take u seriously accordingly !

 

[Rafi]

The Quaid was a visionary leader - and he did not take lightly the creation of Pakistan, but analysed that this was the logical result of congress and nehru machinations, and the best chance to safe guard Muslim rights.

 

[Yeti]

It was the way partition was done which was bad, the sole blame lies on the British who removed the army in Karachi and Punjab so the rioters had a open hand to loot and kill.

 

[WAR-rior]

There was no partition as such my friend, we achieved independence as a country from the British

its different way of saying same thing for ur convinience..in english we call it misrepresentation.

just like IVC is ancient pakistan(sorry for being offtopic but its very much in context to the reply)

 

[Rafi]

It was Mountbatten who removed the Punjab Boundary Force which allowed the mass murder to occur.

 

[Rafi]

its different way of saying same thing for ur convinience..in english we call it misrepresentation.

just like IVC is ancient pakistan(sorry for being offtopic but its very much in context to the reply)

It is not misrepresentation - we achieved Independence from the British Empire - and Ancient Pakistan is also a fact, in that it is our land.