What's new

Some of Hong Kong's poor finally feel at home in 290 sq ft modules

Mista

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
4,567
Reaction score
10
Country
Singapore
Location
Singapore
HONG KONG: When Lau Kai Fai, his wife and teenage son moved into a new Hong Kong flat last month, he thought the 290 sq ft of space in his "module home" felt like "winning the lottery".

Among the first Hong Kong residents to move into such prefabricated dwellings, built as a transition for people awaiting public housing, Lau's family more than tripled the space they had squeezed into. Now they sit together for meals, rather than eating in turns.

While tiny by the standards of many cities in rich countries, the new home represents a big step up – even if temporary – for Lau, 70, in one of the most crowded urban areas in the world.

1601370726621.png

Lau Kai Fai, 70, sits inside his new home with his wife at Shek Kip Mei, in Hong Kong, Sep 14, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Tyrone Siu)

"It feels like a home," Lau said. "The previous flat was only a place to sleep."

Lau is the beneficiary of Hong Kong's latest initiative to ease a housing shortage, where more than 200,000 people living in subdivided flats are waiting an average of 5.5 years to get public housing.

Transitional homes are built on idle land leased by the government or private developers for only a few years, although the prefab modules can be moved and reused.

The 2018 plan only scratches the surface of the needs of one of the world's most unequal cities: More than 1 million of the 7.5 million people in Hong Kong live in poverty. As of June, 800 transitional homes had been built of 15,000 planned over the next three years.

READ: Too many Hong Kong residents want affordable housing but there are too few flats

But for the Lau family, the flat in a four-storey building in one of the oldest and poorest districts in central Kowloon is luxury.

HOMEWORK AT DESK, NOT BED

Their previous flat, one of many in Hong Kong dubbed "coffin homes", had cost around HK$5,000 (US$650) a month in rent. Now the family pays HK$3,000 – 25 per cent of the income of the retired Lau's wife, Tian Jiayu, the family breadwinner who works in a supermarket.

They finally have a place where their son does his homework at a desk rather than in bed.


1601370752904.png

A newly-built four-storey "module homes" building made from pre-fabricated parts is seen at Shek Kip Mei, in Hong Kong, Sep 14, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Tyrone Siu)

The door to the white, container-shaped dwelling opens onto a bunk bed. A wardrobe separates the bed from the living room, where a rotating chair doubles for computer work and dining. Twelve steps from the entrance, at the end of the flat, stands the mini-kitchen with a refrigerator, stoves and washer.

The move expanded the family's floor space from 80 sq ft to 290 sq ft. They now live in two-thirds the median area of a home in crowded Hong Kong, at 430 sq ft – itself half the size of the average London home.

In Tokyo, another packed Asian capital, the average home is 710 sq ft, although some 1.4 million people live in spaces of 210 sq ft or less, according to government figures.

Tian is happiest about the upgrade to mini-kitchen from gas stove.

1601370768241.png

Lau Kai Fai, 70, cleans his new home with his wife at Shek Kip Mei, in Hong Kong, Sep 14, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Tyrone Siu)

The land for Nan Cheong 2020, the city's first module home project, was leased by developer Henderson Land for HK$1 a month. The project was built by the Hong Kong Council of Social Service.

It was built from container-like blocks for only 40 per cent of the cost of building a public rental home, said Anthony Wong, business director of the nonprofit.

READ: Out of reach? The unaffordability of housing fuelling the Hong Kong protests

Lack of land and money are challenges to building more transitional homes. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) say the government is not doing enough. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam is under pressure for housing solutions, including shoring up the transitional housing scheme.

"The problem is the government is acting like a middle man rather than taking the responsibility to develop it. They are relying on NGOs and developers to do that," said Sze Lai Shan, community organiser at the Society for Community Organisation.

A spokesman for the Transport and Housing Bureau told Reuters the government launched a HK$5 billion funding scheme in June to support transitional housing projects by NGOs, which can come in many different arrangements and different ideas.

1601370791822.png

A view inside a walk-up flat that has been subdivided into six cubicles in the New Territories of Hong Kong. (File photo: AFP/Anthony Wallace)

“We hope to ... allow different community groups to use their creativity as much as possible to provide diversified transitional housing projects,” he said by email, adding the government is facilitating short- and long-term "policies to increase housing supply, in order to address housing problem(s) faced by low-income families".

Lau's Nan Cheong 2020 lifeline is two years.

"We hope we'll get a public flat by then, if not there’s nothing we can do," he said. "We’ll have to find a subdivided flat again."

 
.
new place looks spacious. good for these folks, physically and emotionally.
 
. . .
I heard most hongkonger wants to live in prenium area even then the space is small. That makes the reason why their flat is so expensive. If they move into more further away from the prenium area. They can have bigger flat. Is hongkonger choosy or their MTR or transport is limited?
 
.
HK is an example how bad ordinary people lives are in an extremely free economy.

It's not really a 'free market'. The government artificially keep prices high by limiting the amount of land released. They have to collect land revenue, as well as to protect the asset value of homeowners.

I heard most hongkonger wants to live in prenium area even then the space is small. That makes the reason why their flat is so expensive. If they move into more further away from the prenium area. They can have bigger flat. Is hongkonger choosy or their MTR or transport is limited?

It's more affordable, but not by much I think.

1601380762963.png


1601380922735.png


1601380981945.png
 
.
It feels like the same size as the college dormitory where I used to live. Living in such a small flat, the state of mind must be very bad. Fortunately, I still had the chance to move to a large apartment.
 
Last edited:
. . .
What is this capitalist thought doing in a "communist" country ?
If hong kong is really takeover by communist. They wouldnt need to squeeze in such small area but big houses for most hongkonger.
 
.
If hong kong is really takeover by communist. They wouldnt need to squeeze in such small area but big houses for most hongkonger.

OK, that should be done, but what are other capitalist elements doing in mainland China like the two stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen ? They should be shut down, right ?
 
.
OK, that should be done, but what are other capitalist elements doing in mainland China like the two stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen ? They should be shut down, right ?

Around the 1990s, many state-owned enterprises faced bankruptcy crisis, while residents accumulated huge amounts of savings.
So at that time, the government needed stock markets to extricate state-owned enterprises in urgent need of financing from bankruptcy with savings that flowed into the market which could cause serious inflation.

*If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you can search for information.
In brief, China faced a huge crisis in the 1990s, when inflation was extremely high (18%±) and state-owned enterprises were in jeopardy. The role of the stock markets is to relieve the difficulties of state-owned enterprises at that time.
 
Last edited:
.
It's not really a 'free market'. The government artificially keep prices high by limiting the amount of land released. They have to collect land revenue, as well as to protect the asset value of homeowners.
This looks like government control policy. In fact it's opposite. A real government control economy will not tolerate house price jumping that high. Singapore is an example. HK government's land policy is driven by market motivation.
 
.
Both Singapore and HK property are government controlled so as China.

GoHK is controlled by oligarch such as Li Ka Shing. Despite China asking HK to provision public housing during Tung Chee Wah time, the HK oligarch mobilized the middle class to shoot it down.

Singapore low cost housing is backed by massive quasi confiscated of land from people. (not saying this is a bad thing)

This looks like government control policy. In fact it's opposite. A real government control economy will not tolerate house price jumping that high. Singapore is an example. HK government's land policy is driven by market motivation.
 
Last edited:
.
Around the 1990s, many state-owned enterprises faced bankruptcy crisis, while residents accumulated huge amounts of savings.
So at that time, the government needed stock markets to extricate state-owned enterprises in urgent need of financing from bankruptcy with savings that flowed into the market which could cause serious inflation.

*If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you can search for information.
In brief, China faced a huge crisis in the 1990s, when inflation was extremely high (18%±) and state-owned enterprises were in jeopardy. The role of the stock markets is to relieve the difficulties of state-owned enterprises at that time.

So what I could understand at this moment is that the stock exchanges was to bring foreign capital and also somehow raise capital from within the local economic system ? Is that right ? And please give me some days for me to process more of your info.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom