‘Solutions to Rohingya crisis needed for free and open Indo-Pacific’ Says Japanese Ambassador Ito Naoki

[UKBengali]

The more the economy of BD grows then the more influence that BD will get with other nations such as Japan.

BD needs to be in a position that in 10-15 years time that countries realise that they are best taking BD's side against Myanmar for their own interests. Consequences of supporting Myanmar could be losing 10s of billions of dollars of infrastructure projects in BD and other trade losses.

In the meantime, BD should be aiming to build a military that can totally dominate Myanmar if one day BD needs to take military action to solve the Rohingya issue once and for all.

Just like Russia protects ethnic Russians near it's borders then BD can do the same for Rohingyas who mainly used to live right next door to BD in Arakhan.

 

[nahtanbob]

The more the economy of BD grows then the more influence that BD will get with other nations such as Japan.

BD needs to be in a position that in 10-15 years time that countries realise that they are best taking BD's side against Myanmar for their own interests. Consequences of supporting Myanmar could be losing 10s of billions of dollars of infrastructure projects in BD and other trade losses.

In the meantime, BD should be aiming to build a military that can totally dominate Myanmar if one day BD needs to take military action to solve the Rohingya issue once and for all.

Just like Russia protects ethnic Russians near it's borders then BD can do the same for Rohingyas who mainly used to live right next door to BD in Arakhan.

All Myanmar has to do is to invite China and the game is over. Whether you like it or now China and India are top dogs in the region. Unless those countries break up it is never going to change. In the grand scheme 1 million Rohingyas are not worth it unless you are coveting Myanmar territory. All the hurt feelings on this forum is reflection of the fact Bangladesh cannot export its excess population into Burmese territory.

 

[UKBengali]

All Myanmar has to do is to invite China and the game is over. Whether you like it or now China and India are top dogs in the region. Unless those countries break up it is never going to change. In the grand scheme 1 million Rohingyas are not worth it unless you are coveting Myanmar territory. All the hurt feelings on this forum is reflection of the fact Bangladesh cannot export its excess population into Burmese territory.

China will not get involved if BD one days decides to impose it's will on Myanmar as regards the Rohingya.

As long as BD does not threaten Chinese interests in Arakhan it won't care.

PS - India is irrelevant in this issue.

 

[nahtanbob]

China will not get involved if BD one days decides to impose it's will on Myanmar as regards the Rohingya.

As long as BD does not threaten Chinese interests in Arakhan it won't care.

PS - India is irrelevant in this issue.

As of today China vetoes resolutions against Myanmar. That says how much they care about Bangladesh in this matter.
If India supplies Myanmar with weapons it will be relevant

 

[UKBengali]

As of today China vetoes resolutions against Myanmar. That says how much they care about Bangladesh in this matter.
If India supplies Myanmar with weapons it will be relevant

Vetoing a resolution is NOT the same as getting militarily involved if BD one days decides to take military action to solve the Rohingya issue in its favour one day.

You forget that BD has an economy FIVE times that of Myanmar and is a stable unitary state unlike the mess than is Myanmar.

China will always want to maintain decent relations with BD and they will only become hostile to BD if BD directly threatens their strategic interests in Myanmar which BD will never do.

Now unless you have something productive to say, please leave this as you seem not to know what you are talking about.


PS - Indian supplying weapons to Myanmar has already happened and so who cares. The savages cannot afford much and they are incompetent anyway.

 

[nahtanbob]

Vetoing a resolution is NOT the same as getting militarily involved if BD one days decides to take military action to solve the Rohingya issue in its favour one day.

You forget that BD has an economy FIVE times that of Myanmar and is a stable unitary state unlike the mess than is Myanmar.

China will always want to maintain decent relations with BD and they will only become hostile to BD if BD directly threatens their strategic interests in Myanmar which BD will never do.

Now unless you have something productive to say, please leave this as you seem not to know what you are talking about.


PS - Indian supplying weapons to Myanmar has already happened and so who cares. The savages cannot afford much and they are incompetent anyway.

China will not allow any outside power to mess with Myanmar. 30 years of recent history should tell you that. China is going tell you Arakan belongs to Myanmar.

In the rare event they lose interest in Myanmar. First wars are unpredictable. 90% of your trade is through one port - Chittagong. It is easy to hit it especially for Myanmar. If your economy goes south due to war it will nullify years if not decades of development
If Arakan is really for grabs (that is the law of jungle) India can take it and that will give them another land route to their North East part. What are you going to do ? Challenge the Indian military

 

[UKBengali]

China will not allow any outside power to mess with Myanmar. 30 years of recent history should tell you that.

In the rare event they lose interest in Myanmar. First wars are unpredictable. 90% of your trade is through one port - Chittagong. It is easy to hit it especially for Myanmar. If your economy goes south due to war it will nullify years if not decades of development
If Arakan is really for grabs India can take it and that will give them another land route to their North East part. What are you going to do ? Challenge the Indian military

Last post.

I am talking about when BD may one day have absolute military superiority over Myanmar or can you not read? It may happen as BD is five times richer country.

If Myanmar was to try to hit Chittagong then Myanmar would face devastating bombing by BD airforce and Navy.

Do not bother replying please or else I will put you on ignore list.

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

All the hurt feelings on this forum is reflection of the fact Bangladesh cannot export its excess population into Burmese territory.

High on cow cola? Stop dumping your cow dung everywhere...

 

[bluesky]

You live in Japan , you got your brain washed. That’s it.

No, not exactly. I live in Japan and this is how I can see things more clearly from a distance. I am not brainwashed. Japanese newspapers seldom write about my country BD. I am talking from my own perspective. So, no chance of being brainwashed.

Top BD people take 40% of all the project money financed by China/ Chinese companies. This is why Chinese loan is so sweet to them.

And. America may be thinking that once the bribe money is prohibited from being transferred to Western countries, BD top guys will have no attractions to take bribes.

China is supporting corruption to BD top guys and BD top people will certainly teach corruption in the Western society without feeling shame.

For real development, BD needs investments in industries. japan will shortly do it. Industrial products made in BD under Japanese investments will compete with Chinese products sold in Africa and other countries.

Chinese labor costs are quite low. So, the factory owners are not interested to relocate to our shores. But, Japanese will do so in a few years after they complete a few infrastructure projects.

Our industrialization starts. Once it happens, many other countries will also set shops in BD. Am I dreaming or am I just brainwashed?

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

China will not get involved if BD one days decides to impose it's will on Myanmar as regards the Rohingya.

How do you know? Stop making Russian type assumption...

As long as BD does not threaten Chinese interests in Arakhan it won't care.

And do you decide what is Chinese interest?

PS - India is irrelevant in this issue.

India never was and never will be relevant on any international matter. Currently they are just another cannon fodder of NATO against china.

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

Vetoing a resolution is NOT the same as getting militarily involved if BD one days decides to take military action to solve the Rohingya issue in its favour one day.

Veto means support.

And china dont have to send troops to help burma. They can send cheap arms and ammos for free.

You forget that BD has an economy FIVE times that of Myanmar and is a stable unitary state unlike the mess than is Myanmar.

Our current economic strength doesn't mean anything, we aren't innovative or self sufficient country, so geopolitically we are nothing.

Burma is a perfect client state.

China will always want to maintain decent relations with BD and they will only become hostile to BD if BD directly threatens their strategic interests in Myanmar which BD will never do.

Again russian type assumption. You don't make Chinese policies...

 

[UKBengali]

Veto means support.

And china dont have to send troops to help burma. They can send cheap arms and ammos for free.

Our current economic strength doesn't mean anything, we aren't innovative or self sufficient country, so geopolitically we are nothing.

Burma is a perfect client state.

Again russian type assumption. You don't make Chinese policies...

Who cares about weapons as Myanmar still would need to use them itself.
BD would only care if China got involved itself.

Anyway if you read my posts I was taking 10-15 years into the future and not now. BD is in no state to impose its will on Myanmar anytime in the near future.

China is a practical country and as long as BD does not threaten Chinese vital interests in Myanmar it would not care much either way.

PS - How do you know China will get involved? You are making the same assumptions that you are accusing me of dude.

 

[nahtanbob]

Who cares about weapons as Myanmar still would need to use them itself.
BD would only care if China got involved itself.

Anyway if you read my posts I was taking 10-15 years into the future and not now. BD is in no state to impose its will on Myanmar anytime in the near future.

China is a practical country and as long as BD does not threaten Chinese vital interests in Myanmar it would not care much either way.

PS - How do you know China will get involved? You are making the same assumptions that you are accusing me of dude.

Right now with the way things are in terms of USA-China rivalry and USA pulling in India. There is no evidence it will go away in next 10-15 years.
Myanmar is attractive to all sides. China, USA, India can all block Bangladesh from taking Arakan.

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

I am talking about when BD may one day have absolute military superiority over Myanmar

That day might never come. Every Bangladeshi institution is weak and filled with low IQ corrupt people. Thanks to autocratic rulers...

It may happen as BD is five times richer country.

Thats because we have a massive population and it means nothing. We dont have spare money to throw on shiny new weapons purchase.

If Myanmar was to try to hit Chittagong then Myanmar would face devastating bombing by BD airforce and Navy.

We dont have airforce and seems like navy folks aren't average IQ people either (looking at their c13b Corvette purchase from china). So Im skeptical...

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

Who cares about weapons as Myanmar still would need to use them itself.
BD would only care if China got involved itself.

Every person with average IQ will care. Bangladesh never will be a rich, innovative and self-sufficient country. So we have to care for every little things...

Anyway if you read my posts I was taking 10-15 years into the future and not now. BD is in no state to impose its will on Myanmar anytime in the near future.

Then adjust the number to 40-50 years.

China is a practical country and as long as BD does not threaten Chinese vital interests in Myanmar it would not care much either way.

And you will decide what is the Chinese interest?

PS - How do you know China will get involved? You are making the same assumptions that you are accusing me of dude.

Nope, china already supporting burma with un veto, investment and arms supply.

My assumption has some facts in it and it is the safest way to avoid Russian type disaster. Considering the worst case scenario is the best practice in administration and decision making.

Your assumption has no merit...