What's new

SLAP ON THE FACE OF PATWARIS JIYALAS AND MAULANA

. . . .
Lol. The nail in the coffin for all this 'rigging' rubbish.

Bro, Pakistanis should not care too much about getting rubber stamp approval from outsiders.

I don't think its nail in the coffin as far as western media etc reporting on it:


erm link: bbc.com/news/world-asia-44965868

The Economist was especially scathing:

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018...lection-rigging-overshadow-pakistans-election

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2...kistans-generals-to-stop-meddling-in-politics

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/07/28/imran-khans-unsportsmanlike-win-in-pakistan

But the point is, Rome was not built in a day....neither did Rome care about others commentary while being built. Pakistanis should not care too much about outsiders politics comparisons/approvals (EU or whoever - remember EU observer commentary right now is when they are inside Pakistan, their full report is always different tone later).

....Instead focus solely on socioeconomic comparison and objectives.....because politics will always be criticized by others no matter what...because its easy to do....but economy speaks for itself. That is why I wish Mr. Khan the best of luck, because hopefully he can bring in the crucial reforms and sound development that Pakistan sorely needs....precisely on the mandate of the other 3 options having been tried by Pakistan (2 major parties and military rule) but found wanting. I am especially interested to see what economic decisions he takes this year right away....because there is a big ever-increasing list to get through.

@kaptaan I mean @Indus Pakistan (hah you changed your name!) @Zibago @django @PaklovesTurkiye @Areesh
 
.
@kaptaan I mean
Since IK is the PM in waiting I thought it was time to let go that handle and go for something that cuts across partisan politics. Unity and focus is now needed.

I am not in Pakistan. But let's be honest. will there have been rigging? Yes. Was their 'establishment' help? Probably. But that is the normative. I mean all those complaining are acting as if before Pakistan was some model democracy like Norway. Look at the people shouting out about establishment support. Nawaz Sharif. He is the illigitmate child og Gen. Zia's brutal ten year military dictatorship. NW was nurtured in the womb of a dictatorship. He was incubated by a military regime. And now this guy has the temerity to compain. The only differance is IK might have got a few winks from the establishment [which is good thing because at least they will all be on the same page] but NS was literrly incubated, then suckled on Gen. Zia's teats and then when he got strong enough he stood on his own legs. IK on the other hand has struggled in the wildrness for over 20 years and you can see that struggle etched on his face.

Then there is the scion of Bhutto family. This guy is just a young pup who should be running after girls or something but as he belongs to the 'Bhutto' brand he thinks he should be next PM. That is dynastic politics. Nobody stops and thinks about exactly how is that democratic. And further the Bhutto brand was also a bastard child of another military regime - Gen. Ayub Khan. Both suckled on the military tits but now are complaining about establishment support.

And I cannot agree with IK more about the agenda. I will be honest. I don't give a flying figg about number of warships, submarines, fighters, tanks, this, that, but I am concerned about my fellow Pakistanis. The poor. A measure of any society is how it looks after the poor, the ill and weak. So I think and hope IK will focus on bread and butter of life

Health Service
Education
Poverty
Female maternal care/education
Sanitation/water
Affordable housing
law/order

All those everyday things but without them life is one long struggle. And as you perhaps know PTI has done a good job in Khyber Pakhtunkwa on these core issues. Please read this piece from Dawn which is anything but pro PTI. This is example of basics I expect PTI to roll out across Pakistan.


HIDDEN under the trite sound bites that the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s political leadership thrives on, lies the story of a revolution that must be told.


PTI supporters should be disappointed that their leadership hasn’t effectively told the rest of the country about one of their biggest successes.


Few Pakistanis know that the party’s government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has successfully implemented a healthcare solution that is a blueprint for the rest of the country to follow.


No, it is not the case that KP has radically outspent everyone else. In fact, all four provinces are running neck and neck in terms of health spending as a percentage of their budgets. The claim that KP’s spending priorities are somehow vastly different than Punjab’s, which only builds metros, is a fallacy that should be removed from the PTI’s rhetorical arsenal and thrown in the wreckage left by Peshawar’s bus rapid-transit project.


What should replace it is the reality of the Sehat Sahulat Programme. Because it is innovations like these that can make widespread access to decent medical care a reality in Pakistan. And that is something worth talking about.


What should replace the PTI’s rhetorical arsenal is the reality of KP’s health programme.


Sehat Sahulat is the KP government’s flagship health insurance programme. As of now, around half of the households in the province, selected for need, based on the Benazir Income Support Programme methodology, are card-carrying members.


An expansion of coverage to 70 per cent of the population is under way. The cards, known as Sehat Insaf cards, signify that the holders are covered by health insurance, with premiums paid to State Life directly by the provincial government.


This insurance allows households to utilise up to Rs540,000 per year, for medical treatment and medicines, at public and private hospitals across the province. So, the poorest person in KP, sans a single rupee in hand, can be treated at the finest private hospital in Peshawar, just like any fee-paying patient.


The cherry on top? The insurance also pays patients lost wages, and in case of referrals from outside Peshawar, travelling money.


Premiums are surprisingly low. Currently, the KP government pays the insurance company just Rs1,500 a year per household covered. Well-placed sources confirm this will have to rise a bit, as the insurance company is currently losing money on the deal.


To keep costs low, and to combat fraud, there are a few caveats to the coverage. Outpatient care isn’t included, and there are rules relating to referrals that can be cumbersome. There is also a conscious attempt to prioritise utilisation of government hospitals, to allow them to generate revenue. Despite this, around 60 per cent of the fees paid in insurance claims, are paid to private hospitals.


Sehat Sahulat is a dramatic step towards equity in medical care. It replaces a system where a poor person requiring surgery had to choose between a lower survival probability at a crowded public hospital unable to cope with patient demand, and the certainty of financial ruin at a better equipped private hospital. It lessens the burden on public hospitals, raises the status of poor patients there (because they now represent a revenue source in the form of insurance payments), and enables people to afford private treatment that would previously have been unthinkable.


Alongside equity, Sehat Sahulat represents efficiency in spending healthcare resources. Such efficiency isn’t typically achieved by well-intentioned gentlemen in robes, poking at bed sheets, taste-testing food, ordering equipment purchases, and embarrassing the handful of highly qualified specialists who choose to make Pakistan their home.


If public hospitals across the country are hopelessly overcrowded, understaffed and under-equipped, then, yes, part of the reason is that budgetary allocations to healthcare must be raised.


But there is a more obvious reason — Pakistan is a poor country. To illustrate just how poor we are, consider this: even adjusting for purchasing power and price differences, every rupee earned by every person in the country wouldn’t be enough to publicly fund a healthcare system of the quality of, say, Norway ($5000+ per capita expenditure).


So, what we have must be spent efficiently. What KP’s brilliant initiative does is show what this might look like. By focusing more spending on insurance premiums, the state encourages a marketplace where entrepreneurs want to invest capital to build and equip new facilities that the government can’t afford upfront.


KP’s health-sector insiders confirm that this is well under way in the province. New private hospitals are being built at a rapid pace, to cater to demand from a newly insured patient base. This efficiently frees up the capital expense that would be required to build new facilities.


Some treatments are so expensive that no affordable insurance would cover them. For these, the state’s answer will have to remain specialised centres of excellence like the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute in Punjab, and the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Sindh. And for primary care, including the Lady Health Worker programmes and small health units, each province has lessons to learn from others. For everything else, look to KP.


A broad-based, sustainable insurance initiative including private hospitals is something that the federal government has also been working on. That programme, called the Prime Minister’s National Health Programme, still in the early phases of roll-out, covers just a few districts and offers far fewer benefits to beneficiaries. That the KP government has implemented its bold plan on the scale it has, in the time frame it has, is astounding.


That they haven’t talked about it more is shocking. The PTI would do well to change that now. And come July, each provincial government must roll the programme out in their domain.


Just as the PTI’s 100-day agenda promises — in about 10 words buried right near the end. One hopes that those supporting equity and efficiency in healthcare spending didn’t miss it.


The writer is a Lahore-based columnist and consultant with a background in finance, public and private sector strategy, and energy.


Twitter: @assadahmad


Published in Dawn, June 16th, 2018


https://www.dawn.com/news/1414476


A word or two about the Pakistan military. It may be ugly. It may not be exactly liberal thing to say but Pakistan needs Pakistan Army more then just deending the borders if not even more than that becaus with nuke in place I do not seriously regard India a existential threat. However like most Third World countries Pakistan is riven by ethnic, tribal, biraderi, religious sectarian faultlines. The PA is the steel scaffolding that holds everything together. Have you seen how Iraq descended into chaos, Afghanistan into anarchy or Libya. That is exactly where Pakistan would be sans a very powerful military. That is what gives shape to Pakistan. It is the steel structure that holds everything together. Right now what do you think stops NS from bringing out mobs to fight PTI? Such a event would soon take on ethnic colours as you know PTI is centred on K-Pk, PML in upper Punjab around Lahore, PPP in interior Sindh. You can imagine where we would end up in. Soon ethnic groups would be also fighting sectarian groups who would be fighting differant shades of Ialamists and then the entire world would begin to sponsor their own groups. That is the hell we would face without a powerful all dominating military that cuts across ethnic and sectarian lines. Thus whether people like it for now and distent future we need a strong military. Only when Pak has matured can we move on and that will happen in it's good time.
 
. .
Bro, Pakistanis should not care too much about getting rubber stamp approval from outsiders.

I don't think its nail in the coffin as far as western media etc reporting on it:


erm link: bbc.com/news/world-asia-44965868

The Economist was especially scathing:

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018...lection-rigging-overshadow-pakistans-election

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2...kistans-generals-to-stop-meddling-in-politics

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/07/28/imran-khans-unsportsmanlike-win-in-pakistan

But the point is, Rome was not built in a day....neither did Rome care about others commentary while being built. Pakistanis should not care too much about outsiders politics comparisons/approvals (EU or whoever - remember EU observer commentary right now is when they are inside Pakistan, their full report is always different tone later).

....Instead focus solely on socioeconomic comparison and objectives.....because politics will always be criticized by others no matter what...because its easy to do....but economy speaks for itself. That is why I wish Mr. Khan the best of luck, because hopefully he can bring in the crucial reforms and sound development that Pakistan sorely needs....precisely on the mandate of the other 3 options having been tried by Pakistan (2 major parties and military rule) but found wanting. I am especially interested to see what economic decisions he takes this year right away....because there is a big ever-increasing list to get through.

@kaptaan I mean @Indus Pakistan (hah you changed your name!) @Zibago @django @PaklovesTurkiye @Areesh
Media based and clearly biased reporting versus one done by a well established international consortium of countries witj long standing democratic process?
Hmm.. tough choice
 
.
Bro, Pakistanis should not care too much about getting rubber stamp approval from outsiders.

I don't think its nail in the coffin as far as western media etc reporting on it:


erm link: bbc.com/news/world-asia-44965868

The Economist was especially scathing:

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018...lection-rigging-overshadow-pakistans-election

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2...kistans-generals-to-stop-meddling-in-politics

https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/07/28/imran-khans-unsportsmanlike-win-in-pakistan

But the point is, Rome was not built in a day....neither did Rome care about others commentary while being built. Pakistanis should not care too much about outsiders politics comparisons/approvals (EU or whoever - remember EU observer commentary right now is when they are inside Pakistan, their full report is always different tone later).

....Instead focus solely on socioeconomic comparison and objectives.....because politics will always be criticized by others no matter what...because its easy to do....but economy speaks for itself. That is why I wish Mr. Khan the best of luck, because hopefully he can bring in the crucial reforms and sound development that Pakistan sorely needs....precisely on the mandate of the other 3 options having been tried by Pakistan (2 major parties and military rule) but found wanting. I am especially interested to see what economic decisions he takes this year right away....because there is a big ever-increasing list to get through.

@kaptaan I mean @Indus Pakistan (hah you changed your name!) @Zibago @django @PaklovesTurkiye @Areesh
I think our BBC wanted PMLN supporters to reject the results, protest and riot in aftermath of PTI victory. When before the election I posted this about the BBC, webmaster made the whole thread vanish o_O
 
Last edited:
. .
Vote ko Izat do...and people gave their respect for the vote by coming out in droves and making right use of it...!
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom