What's new

Slap on Apple's Face by Samsung

^^ Bud, i was talking about Arc S and it is not that old....It realsed in India on August 2011....
Nope you didn't mention S. Anyways you still cant consider a single core processor based mobile as a bench mark to evaluate a brand, when the stakes have been raised to quad core processors. Let alone the fact that Arc S was by sony-ericsson and SONY phones are relatively newer, different and improved.
 
.
Nope you didn't mention S. Anyways you still cant consider a single core processor based mobile as a bench mark to evaluate a brand, when the stakes have been raised to quad core processors. Let alone the fact that Arc S was by sony-ericsson and SONY phones are relatively newer, different and improved.

Agreed, Sony is new to smart phone market and there is lots of catching up to do with Samsung and HTC...When it comes to aesthetics, no one does it better than sony (may be apple)....But performance wise samsung and HTC holds the cake....

and thats the point i was making sony released Xperia series as first modest attempt to attract smart phone users,(for me they failed)....Sony always will be remembered because of there Walkmen series not because of there smart phones, unless they come up with something mindblowing...
 
.
Samsung did not infringe Apple patent: Tokyo court


TOKYO -- A Tokyo court on Friday dismissed Apple Inc.'s claim that Samsung had infringed on one of its patents — the latest ruling in the global legal battle between the two technology titans over smartphones.

The Japanese court case addressed only the synchronizing technology that allows media players to share data with personal computers and was not comparable in scope to the much larger victory that Apple won in the U.S. last week.

Samsung Electronics Co. of South Korea, the world's largest maker of phones, welcomed the Tokyo District Court ruling that its technology that allows media players and personal computers to share music files and other content did not infringe on Apple patents as confirming “our long-held position.”

“We will continue to offer highly innovative products to consumers, and continue our contributions toward the mobile industry's development,” the company said in a statement.

The Apple lawyer present at the courthouse declined comment, and the company said later it had no comment, including whether it intended to appeal. In the past, Apple has accused Samsung of copying Apple products.

In a session lasting just a few minutes, Judge Tamotsu Shoji said he did not think Samsung products fell into the realm of Apple technology and dismissed the lawsuit, filed by Apple in August last year.

Apple, the Cupertino, California-based maker of the hit iPhone and iPad, is embroiled in similar legal tussles around the world over whether Samsung smartphones, which rely on Google Inc.'s Android technology, illegally used Apple designs, ideas or technology.

In one such case, a jury in California ruled last week that Samsung products illegally used such Apple creations as the “bounce-back” feature when a user scrolls to an end image, and the ability to zoom text with a tap of a finger.

The jury awarded Apple US$1 billion in damages, and a judge is now evaluating Apple's request to have eight Samsung products pulled from shelves and banned from the U.S. market, including popular Galaxy model smartphones. Samsung's latest hit, Galaxy S III, was not part of the U.S. ruling.

Samsung shares closed 1.48 percent higher in Seoul on Friday.

Friday's ruling was the first held in Japan in the Samsung-Apple global court battle, but other technology is being contested by the two companies in separate legal cases in Japan.

Seo Won-seok, an analyst at Seoul-based Korea Investment & Securities, said the Tokyo verdict showed that the lawsuits around the world are largely isolated and may not be affected by Apple's major victory in California.

“The favorable ruling for Samsung convinces me that lawsuits in other countries may play out differently from the one in the U.S.,” he said.

“It was a ruling on just one technology so it is difficult to draw any conclusion on its overall impact,” said Michiru Takahashi, a patent lawyer at Jones Day in Tokyo.

“But ... if Samsung had lost again it would have considerably hurt its image.”

Samsung did not infringe Apple patent: Tokyo court - The China Post
 
.
Swap that Apple over the boy's head and Samsung over the girl's head. Fun fact: Samsung created the screen for the Iphone 1 :)

So, what, First of all Apple is a software company, secondly yes get many parts from different manufacture. There is nothing new many companies do what about Sony from where they get panel there are plenty of example. On more specific what about SOC.

The things if you have better hardware it does not mean you have device. Apple assembling good hardware with their OS, same people assemble there computer's according to there need, GPU,CPU,MOB,PSU etc. However Apple main advantage is their iOS.
 
.
304718_4566834609993_1818451426_n.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom