Six US fighter jets destroyed in Prince Harry base attack

[Esc8781]

yea you would have lost ww2 if u had not nuked japanese civilians........

Yeah they would of go ontil it was the last man standing extiction or nuke?

 

[474474]

Yup...Germany would have un-surrendered...Japs would stopped starving. Took history lesson at what madrassa?

Hahaha, typical right-wing nutjob, You sound more like the one from some 'madrasa', i mean you wouldn't even survive two minutes on 4chan, your own countrymen would skin you alive.

 

[474474]

Yup...Germany would have un-surrendered...Japs would stopped starving. Took history lesson at what madrassa?

Hahaha, typical right-wing nutjob, You sound more like the one from some 'madrasa', i mean you wouldn't even survive two minutes on 4chan, your own countrymen would skin you alive.

 

[airmarshal]

The attack was very similar to the attack on Minhas base and Mehran base in Pakistan. So we need to wonder where is the source of their training. It looks like attackers in both countries are coming from the same source.

So what we see is not what it is and what it is, is not what we see!! Kind of confusing.

 

[jnd3x0]

well now world can understand that even Super power can be a victim of such incidents and finally people who were criticizing Pak fauj before can realize too.

 

[Mercenary]

yea you would have lost ww2 if u had not nuked japanese civilians........

What kind of a stupid statement is that?

Go read a book.

 

[turbo charged]

What kind of a stupid statement is that?

Go read a book.

dont post stupid one liners.....i have common sense which u lack.....why did USA used nukes if it was winning??Nukes were only used cause americans news japanese were fearless,had advanced tactics,were greater in number and were preparing for more pearl harbours type attacks.

 

[forcetrip]

dont post stupid one liners.....i have common sense which u lack.....why did USA used nukes if it was winning??Nukes were only used cause americans news japanese were fearless,had advanced tactics,were greater in number and were preparing for more pearl harbours type attacks.

Oh noes .. no more geotv for you !!!

 

[nForce]

dont post stupid one liners.....i have common sense which u lack.....why did USA used nukes if it was winning??Nukes were only used cause americans news japanese were fearless,had advanced tactics,were greater in number and were preparing for more pearl harbours type attacks.

What would have the Japanese fought with ? Bolt-action Arisaka rifles that used to be longer than the height of an average Japanese ? Middle age type Banzai charges in front of machine guns ? sunken battleships ?From what I know,the Japanese did not even have a decent machine gun. Not advocating the nuking of Japan here..no..never..But the facts remains that the Japanese had very little chances of winning.Only God knows what would have happened if the American Marines entered Japanese mainland.Yes,you are correct on one point.The Japanese were a fearless bunch of warriors.

 

[blufmaster]

It was Pakistan!!! No way can these fighters destroy 6 aircraft and infiltrate a heavily protected base unless it has foreign backing. Well trained, well equipped...

SO YOU BELIEVE PAKISTAN WAS BEHIND THIS.......IMAGINE IF 15 OF THESE **** TRAINED TALIBAN CAN DO THIS..... WAHT A REAL PAK ARMY SOLDIER CAN DO.......

ITS THE ALARM SITUATION FOR NATO AND US FORECES INCLUDED INDIA



AMERICA= INDIA =

 

[turbo charged]

What would have the Japanese fought with ? Bolt-action Arisaka rifles that used to be longer than the height of an average Japanese ? Middle age type Banzai charges in front of machine guns ? sunken battleships ?From what I know,the Japanese did not even have a decent machine gun. Not advocating the nuking of Japan here..no..never..But the facts remains that the Japanese had very little chances of winning.Only God knows what would have happened if the American Marines entered Japanese mainland.Yes,you are correct on one point.The Japanese were a fearless bunch of warriors.

you dont know anything.......did japanese flew on arisaka rifles and attacked pearl harbour?.....

what has height to do with this thread??

do u suffer from inferiority complex cause of small height?

 

[turbo charged]

edit....double post.

 

[nForce]

you dont know anything.......did japanese flew on arisaka rifles and attacked pearl harbour?.....

what has height to do with this thread??

do u suffer from inferiority complex cause of small height and small gun?

not a thread on ww2,so i will try to be as much brief as possible.

The 'Mitshubishi zero' did not fly on water.The japanese had barely any fuel left for continue the war for only 6 months at max and that too being defensive only.The same was the case with almost any kind of resources.In the last days,the Japanese were melting almost any kind of metal they found,in streets,parks to make rifles.They could never match the American industries and resources.Being sarcastic doesnt help much when you are discussing things to the point.And you can surprise an enemy with an attack like Pearl Harbour only once.Did you see it getting repeated after that?

That Arisaka rifle is a symbol of supremacy of American weapons over the Japanese.A bolt-action rifle that is 5ft6inches in length is extremently difficult to handle especially for someone whose average height is less than that.It was simply no match for the M1 or the Tommy gun the Americans had.

Anyways,its quite evident that you need to do a lot more reading..Go read a book.