What's new

Singapore PM backs India for Permanent UN seat

.
Washington, Nov 30: The United States official diplomatic wires leaked by WikiLeaks have exposed that US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has mocked India's bid for permanent United Nations Sceurity Council Seat (UNSC).

According to leaked documents, Hillary Clinton defined India as a “self-appointed front runner" for UNSC seat.

In a cable dealing with UNSC expansion, the US State Department reportedly asked its diplomats to collect details about the bids of 'self-appointed front-runners" for the permanent seat of UNSC.
 
.
Washington, Nov 30: The United States official diplomatic wires leaked by WikiLeaks have exposed that US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has mocked India's bid for permanent United Nations Sceurity Council Seat (UNSC).

According to leaked documents, Hillary Clinton defined India as a “self-appointed front runner" for UNSC seat.

In a cable dealing with UNSC expansion, the US State Department reportedly asked its diplomats to collect details about the bids of 'self-appointed front-runners" for the permanent seat of UNSC.

Like a mouse running in a circular cage.
 
.
India should donate the permanent seat again to some other country just like we donated the permanent seat for China in 1955.
 
. . .
Washington, Nov 30: The United States official diplomatic wires leaked by WikiLeaks have exposed that US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has mocked India's bid for permanent United Nations Sceurity Council Seat (UNSC).

According to leaked documents, Hillary Clinton defined India as a “self-appointed front runner" for UNSC seat.

In a cable dealing with UNSC expansion, the US State Department reportedly asked its diplomats to collect details about the bids of 'self-appointed front-runners" for the permanent seat of UNSC.

she did not mocked india,she mocked japan,germany,India and brazil all front runners for UN permanent seat.
Do your calculations and decide which country holds most strategic interest for USA ?
 
.
India should donate the permanent seat again to some other country just like we donated the permanent seat for China in 1955.

How generous, just like how India donated itself to the British. :rolleyes:
 
. .
India and UNSC seat are the two keywords that get these Chinese out of the wood work and spit venom. Some unassuming Singapore dude made those comments let it go guys, its not yet time to hit the panic button.

---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 PM ----------

That's what I heard happened, the various nations on the Subcontinent were so nice that they donated themselves one by one to the British empire.

Ah!!! the colonial past, shall we talk about how the Japanese shafted their big sticks and the glory of 1930s and the opium wars, we can... discuss the gloried past.
 
.
Hmmm India on the UNSC Hmm I don't see that until the Territory Disputes with both Pakistan and us are solved not to mention several other reasons.
 
.
Hmmm India on the UNSC Hmm I don't see that until the Territory Disputes with both Pakistan and us are solved not to mention several other reasons.

Just like China has resolved all its territorial disputes in 1955 when getting a seat at the table. This issue has been discussed zillion times, and Chinese keep on moving the "criteria" for UNSC with all sorts of things .. including must kill dogs and eat, to get UNSC - Seat.

Fact, is India is not a UNSC-Perm member and for long time India would not be.
 
.
Hmmm India on the UNSC Hmm I don't see that until the Territory Disputes with both Pakistan and us are solved not to mention several other reasons.

UNSC is of no importance (relatively) ... India should just get back Aksai China and P0K.

Through negotiations off course .... lest war mongers start having a field day.

But, yes, I diagree with you on this ... Aksai China and P0K have no linkage to UNSC.
 
.
Just like China has resolved all its territorial disputes in 1955 when getting a seat at the table. This issue has been discussed zillion times, and Chinese keep on moving the "criteria" for UNSC with all sorts of things .. including must kill dogs and eat, to get UNSC - Seat.

Fact, is India is not a UNSC-Perm member and for long time India would not be.

1248105282rk4rxu.jpg


This might be a way to explain India and UNSC

---------- Post added at 03:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:18 PM ----------

UNSC is of no importance (relatively) ... India should just get back Aksai China and ***.

Through negotiations off course .... lest war mongers start having a field day.

But, yes, I diagree with you on this ... Aksai China and *** have no linkage to UNSC.

Why would we give Aksai up ? Our troops fought and bleed and for our land :coffee:
 
.
she did not mocked india,she mocked japan,germany,India and brazil all front runners for UN permanent seat.
Do your calculations and decide which country holds most strategic interest for USA ?

"she did not mock India?" Even by your version of interpretation, India was one of the 4 mocked self claimers. This time you overstretched your propaganda techniques(Name Calling/Glittering Generalities/Transfer/Testimonial/Plain Folks/Card Stacking/Band Wagon/FUD) at which Indian is very good.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom