What's new

SILENCING KASHMIR WITH PUBLIC SAFETY ACT (PSA)

Where ??? Apart for few Pakistanis, you won't find takers for your propaganda piece anywhere in the world. Not even the Palestinian's to begin with. LOL :p:
What propaganda sir?

It is a fact that Indians are islamophobic. You guys will not accept it because, you need to have good relation with Islamic countries for you economic benefits.

But, why you guys want to keep Muslim majority Kashmir with india? Why dont you let them go?

I have talked with some Kashmiri students of IUT in Bangladesh. Seems like they don't like Indians...
 
.
Why dont you join the struggle in Libya then?
Would be one more Indian businessman trying to perform a Spring.
 
.
I am contributing to the Green Struggle in my own little way.

This is one wing of the Russian movement. There are similar people in Europe, South Asia, America, Africa of course and perhaps in South East Asia. In the end I want to see a World Jamahiriya. We intend to use the global Communist movement as a springboard.
 
.
Freckled shy introverts frustrated to the core can only bring chaos not revolution.
 
.
Let's see what we can achieve in the next five to seven years.
 
.
What propaganda sir?

It is a fact that Indians are islamophobic. You guys will not accept it because, you need to have good relation with Islamic countries for you economic benefits.

But, why you guys want to keep Muslim majority Kashmir with india? Why dont you let them go?

I have talked with some Kashmiri students of IUT in Bangladesh. Seems like they don't like Indians...

With all due respect with the civil way of your reply, do you agree if I call Pakistan a terrorist nation in general ???

Just because you have few rough elements in your society who are a negligible minority, is it fare to call the entire Pakistan so ???

If not, the same is applicable when you go ahead and generalise an entire nation of 1.3 billion as Islamphobic just because of the bad conduct of few bad guys in our society. Given the fact that we have provided a lot of eminent Muslim brothers the chance to hold the highest offices including the key posts like President, Intelligence Chief or even our current permanent representative in UN, while you won't be able to show a single such example from your side.

Now on topic, you may very well differentiate your provinces or society as per religion, but as far as we are concerned, irrespective of the faith/religion of the population, we are obliged to maintain the territorial integrity of the nation. Those who are against it can very well protest in any democratic way or leave the nation for ever. But if they prefer an armed struggle, irrespective of their religion we won't respond to bullets with roses. :p:
 
.
With all due respect with the civil way of your reply, do you agree if I call Pakistan a terrorist nation in general ???

Just because you have few rough elements in your society who are a negligible minority, is it fare to call the entire Pakistan so ???
No...
If not, the same is applicable when you go ahead and generalise an entire nation of 1.3 billion as Islamphobic just because of the bad conduct of few bad guys in our society. Given the fact that we have provided a lot of eminent Muslim brothers the chance to hold the highest offices including the key posts like President, Intelligence Chief or even our current permanent representative in UN, while you won't be able to show a single such example from your side
Fair points...

Cant tell about Pakistan. But, in Bangladesh only PM, presidential and armed forces chief offices yet to have person from minorities.
Now on topic, you may very well differentiate your provinces or society as per religion, but as far as we are concerned, irrespective of the faith/religion of the population, we are obliged to maintain the territorial integrity of the nation. Those who are against it can very well protest in any democratic way or leave the nation for ever. But if they prefer an armed struggle, irrespective of their religion we won't respond to bullets with roses. :p:
Fair points too!

But, Im not satisfied...

Under two nation theory Pakistan should have got whole Kashmir. As it is and was a Muslim majority state...
 
.
No...

Fair points...

Cant tell about Pakistan. But, in Bangladesh only PM, presidential and armed forces chief offices yet to have person from minorities.

Fair points too!

But, Im not satisfied...

Under two nation theory Pakistan should have got whole Kashmir. As it is and was a Muslim majority state...

Let me tell you something. Do you expect everyone to acknowledge that the 2 nation theory is some gospel truth ??? :p:
 
. .
Let me tell you something. Do you expect everyone to acknowledge that the 2 nation theory is some gospel truth ??? :p:
No! I dont. But, those kashmiris are suffering for a long time. Just because, India wants them with her...
 
.
No! I dont. But, those kashmiris are suffering for a long time. Just because, India wants them with her...

But the Irony is that Kashmiri's were never suffering and more than happy like any other Indian states for long 40 years period up until 1990's just before the soviet war in Afghanistan was over. Their sufferings started immediately after that. Let me ask you why ??? :azn::azn::azn:

Their sufferings (if any) will be over immediately if Pakistan is ready to let go off their claim of our land. Why won't you advice them instead. :p:
 
.
But the Irony is that Kashmiri's were never suffering and more than happy like any other Indian states for long 40 years period up until 1990's just before the soviet war in Afghanistan was over. Their sufferings started immediately after that. Let me ask you why ??? :azn::azn::azn:

Their sufferings (if any) will be over immediately if Pakistan is ready to let go off their claim of our land. Why won't you advice them instead. :p:
Wrong analysis, learn history especially of your country.

To start with, read this book and get your answers in Chapter 2:
Kashmir in Comparative Perspective: Democracy and Violent Separatism in India
By Sten Widmalm.
 
.
Wrong analysis, learn history especially of your country.

To start with, read this book and get your answers in Chapter 2:
Kashmir in Comparative Perspective: Democracy and Violent Separatism in India
By Sten Widmalm.

Irrespective of how may books you may show me, you won't be able to prove that there was any issue or incidents of terrorism between 1947-1989. This long 40 years was relatively peaceful without any seprateist nature. I dare you to prove me wrong with facts. Else all your claims are nothing but blatant lies aka propaganda. LOL :p:
 
.
Irrespective of how may books you may show me, you won't be able to prove that there was any issue or incidents of terrorism between 1947-1989. This long 40 years was relatively peaceful without any seprateist nature. I dare you to prove me wrong with facts. Else all your claims are nothing but blatant lies aka propaganda. LOL :p:
I don't need to prove you anything. All is proved in the books and the media (newspapers and TV). If you are too lazy to actually back up your words, its not really my problem, is it? Nah, its not. You post carries assumptions based on your thoughts, not facts or figures or history. In fact the 40 year relative peace statement is also wrong (proved in the book) how many times am i supposed to prove you wrong more? once is enough. Read the book mate. get and idea, then come and talk when you have some knowledge, not just so made up imagination.
 
.
**** India and all bhartis. The little savage mongrels deserve no respect.

Yeah, I said it. Ban me... Whatever...Most Pakistanis hate you bhartis for your injustices. We won't stop. Even If you retards find some Pakistanis offering you kind words, it doesn't mean they agree with you assholes. You are really shitty people to be honest. Most of the world hates you. We try not to hate, but you bhartis don't make it any easier on us. You behave like scum bags. It's not like we haven't seen this before, but If you continue this way, there will be retribution from us as Pakistanis.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom