pakpower
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Messages
- 372
- Reaction score
- 0
Ya that's true.
But i think there are lot of Pakistani's who support Taliban. In this site also there are people who support Taliban.
Can you them dude ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya that's true.
But i think there are lot of Pakistani's who support Taliban. In this site also there are people who support Taliban.
Can you them dude ?
oh c'mon roadrunner there is no way even west pakistan had 97% muslim population before partition infact it's impossible coz if that was true then how do you account for the mohajirs who came after partition and added to the muslim population and the number of hindus/sikhs who've left decreasing the non-muslim populatation even further ?
The only way muslims and non-muslim pop percentage could have remained exactly the same in the past 62 years is if your telling me no more muslims came in since partition and no hindus or sikhs left west pakistan and thats absolutely not true.
I am not sure about a 97% Muslim majority before partition, but i think the point RR was making is that a lot of Indians raise this canard of 'Non-Muslims went from 20% to 5%' in Pakistan, as an example of some sort of 'genocidal or discriminatory' policy by Pakistan.
The fact is that the 20% non-Muslims number was inclusive of both East and West Pakistan. West Pakistan had a lower percentage of non-Muslims (Hindu and Sikh) to begin with, and this percentage was further affected by the migrations of millions of non-Muslims out of Pakistan and millions of Muslims into Pakistan.
So the demographics of West Pakistan were primarily changed as a result of the migration in and out of West Pakistan during migration, and not as a result of some sort of genocide or widespread discrimination', which is what that particular canard suggests.
Discrimination exists everywhere to varying degrees, which does not mean it is justified, but to single out Pakistan for it as some Indians like to do by distorting statistics, is disingenuous.Well the fact is, discrimination exists, and the pakistani hindus, who are living in and around haryana and u.p and rajasthan are really a living proof for that.
20% to 1.5% of the total population,why they migrated is a question..!! it doesnt show the tolerance of the religious majority in pakistan, .
I can only make an attempt at answering your questions, so here it goes:highly appreciate it miss but the present situation and the nitty-gritties are not available on the net what you find on google is a biased opinion depending on who wrote the article, if its an american he will blast it and if he is a taliban sympathy man he will try to prove it as the best thing on earth.
my only question is if people are not even sure of what the ground reality is as you have said on this forum them its better not to discuss personal opinions and take it to be the truth and try to prove it, the truth is somewhere in between.
also i raised this question on another thread why did the goverment of pakistan delay the implementation of sharia law on the provinces on which it had local support on it? why did they need the taliban to point out the fact isnt the govement of pakistan above all other agencies there.?
what happening is pakistan is loosing its soverignity dont you accept this truth with me ?
its now two separate regimes which run the country one the GOP and other the taliban both of them have different tax regimes and laws can you even consider the consequences when they start opposing each other if not now then in next 2-5 years where will pakistan stand wont there be a civil war wont the pakistani population suffer then ....
what do you say to this am i right here or not ?
The forum's time needs to be updated according to the new daylight saving time in Pakistan.Back to the topic please.
I can only make an attempt at answering your questions, so here it goes:
1. "also i raised this question on another thread why did the goverment of pakistan delay the implementation of sharia law on the provinces on which it had local support on it?"
Because it really doesn't want to hand over power to the Islamists. Remember in Pakistan you have multiple interpretation of a single verse, so whose version will they adopt and follow without doubt, that's a difficult task.
2. why did they need the taliban to point out the fact isnt the govement of pakistan above all other agencies there.?
Well the Taliban are just a cog in the wheel. The Taliban are using force, against which the army is reluctant to retaliate. They haven't pointed out anything except trying to enforce a brand of Sharia which they are themselves uncomfortable living under. Read BBC reporter Syed Shoaib Hasan's article on the implementation of Sharia in Swat to know how some of them are disgruntled with the process.
3. what happening is pakistan is loosing its soverignity dont you accept this truth with me ?....they start opposing each other if not now then in next 2-5 years where will pakistan stand wont there be a civil war wont the pakistani population suffer then ....
what do you say to this am i right here or not ?"
I actually agree with your statement. There is a civil war of sorts going on in the country whether the state or the military admits it or not. The writ of the government has been lost at one too many places.
Look Mr. RoadRunner people here are asking genuine questions and you are trying to hide behind the veil of Hindutva, fantasies etc.
Why don't you simply answer to moscow's previous post? He raised some valid points and I can guarantee you that Hindutva hasn't 'consumed' Russia yet.
As far as justification goes, in my country or any other civilized nation for that matter, taxes are collected based on affordability and income, not based on religion.
So when we hear such stories, it is definitely a shock because it is unique to your part of the world. The least you can do is educate the members here without actually getting into any defensive mudslinging match.