What's new

Should Pakistan go with ICBMs after NATO strike

maverick1977

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
4,477
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
i am not sure how the policy makers in Islamabad will react to the loss of 24 Pakistani troops, but reason will dictate that Pakistan work on an ICBM. Is there any work being done in this regard. if yes, is Pakistan working on MIRV and ICBMs at the same time. If they already have something hidden, do you think its about time they should test an ICBM as a warning to any potential threats?
 
.
Yes! its highly possible to test an ICBM if we get an open threat of war/attack from the US/NATO ........:smokin:
 
. . .
Yes! its highly possible to test an ICBM if we get an open threat of war/attack from the US/NATO ........:smokin:

it would be difficult for Pakistan to walk in Iran's shoes.Atleast they have the oil to fuel their economy.What does Pakistan have??
 
.
as we used already shaeens ghuris baburs hatafs /? we need hearts and minds and balls not missiles . we have already bloody tons of weapons but we need hand to use them :tdown:

we need hearts and minds and balls agreed.

But we need equipment too,
Holy Prophet said always be prepared for your defense against enemies ,

Against these enemy ICMBS are must , whole world is making them even poor India has made why shouldn't we.
I would even say make H-Bomb why should we let ourselves down in science/defense.
 
. .
we need hearts and minds and balls agreed.

But Holy Prophet said always be prepared for your defense against enemies ,

Against these enemy ICMBS are must , whole world is making them even poor India has made why shouldnt we.
I would even say make H-Bomb why should we let ourselves down in science/defense.

last 10 years what we did it was said by holy prophet ? common man for ICBM we need excuse of holt prophet? were was all these speeches when we destroy pakistan last 10 years we need a person like MAO - NIJAD - KHUMAINI - ATATURK + BALLS
 
.
Why ?

What is different this time ?

Is this the 1st such attack ? ..No, will it be the last such attack ..unlikley.

Is it ok for the US to come upto Abbotabad, kill a few Pak citizens carry awat OBL's body - no ICBMs or stoppage of road convoys then.

What is different this time?

No for a moment am I suggesting that Pak should compormise its self respect but it cannot be selective.

In ans to the Q the title of this thread posed..against whom will the ICBMbe targetted ?

What is different now that soldiers have been killed at an outpost when compared with numerous civilians who die almost daily thanks to suicide bombers. Which ICBM will GOP use against them?
 
. .
last 10 years what we did it was said by holy prophet ? common man for ICBM we need excuse of holt prophet? were was all these speeches when we destroy pakistan last 10 years we need a person like MAO - NIJAD - KHUMAINI - ATATURK + BALLS

No , even if you keep religious prospective away

our democracy and freedom by constitution if practiced in spirit is better then Iran,
No need for KHUMAINI(mullah) we have IMRAN.
(We are modern welfare state not mullah state)

equipment + skills + rights decisions = is right balance for survival

against whom will the ICBMbe targetted ?
all possible threats/enemies.
 
.
Yes, very good and intelligent suggestion :yahoo:

pakistan should make real ICBM with 12,000-15,000 range.

Till now NATO/US ignores threat from every nuke and missiles as they think its against India only and can't reach Europe/USA.

If pakistan develops a ICBM India will be the most happy nation :cheers::smokin:
 
.
it would be difficult for Pakistan to walk in Iran's shoes.Atleast they have the oil to fuel their economy.What does Pakistan have??
Ummm...U think U smart......Pakistan don't let others to know what it got or no.......To tell U the truth we got more than whatever U can even imagine.......Alhamdolillah!..........:)
 
.
Why ?

What is different this time ?

Is this the 1st such attack ? ..No, will it be the last such attack ..unlikley.

Is it ok for the US to come upto Abbotabad, kill a few Pak citizens carry awat OBL's body - no ICBMs or stoppage of road convoys then.

What is different this time?

No for a moment am I suggesting that Pak should compormise its self respect but it cannot be selective.

In ans to the Q the title of this thread posed..against whom will the ICBMbe targetted ?

What is different now that soldiers have been killed at an outpost when compared with numerous civilians who die almost daily thanks to suicide bombers. Which ICBM will GOP use against them?
apply this logic of your on kashmir and next time when indian army people die, dont start crying....
 
.
No , even if you keep religious prospective away

our democracy and freedom by constitution if practiced in spirit is better then Iran,
No need for KHUMAINI(mullah) we have IMRAN.
(We are modern welfare state not mullah state)

equipment + skills + rights decisions = is right balance for survival


all possible threats/enemies.

leave every thing aside

we need SAMs all over borders and orders to shot each and every hostile object try to enter pakistan

thats more more more then enough can we?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom