What's new

SHOCKING! 'Pak PM Nawaz Sharif gave approval for '93 Mumbai blasts'

At least these people have a reason to pick up arms and be anti establishment. ...However crooked it might be...one might even sympathise with them if one understands their concerns....

Please tell me what concerns does boko Haram or isis or al Qaeda has that you would sympathise or lend a ear to?.
So if someone or a group has a reason, they are allowed to kill other innocent people...
upload_2015-6-25_22-51-13.jpeg
 
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif knew about the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts in advance and actually gave his approval for them, claims a new book by a former diplomat.

In his book, ‘Where Borders Bleed: An Insider’s Account of Indo-Pak Relations’ Rajiv Dogra, who was consul general of India in Karachi from 1992 to 1994, talks about a number of contentious issues between the two countries.

Covering historical, diplomatic and military perspectives in almost 70 years of conflict, the book chronicles the events leading up to Partition, reflects on the consequent strife, and provides a perspective on the figures who have shaped the story of this land -- from Lord Mountbatten and Muhammad Ali Jinnah to Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh.

He claims that a former Pakistan Supreme Court judge during a meeting in 1994 on the French chancery premises in Karachi, told him about the blasts.

“I had just walked into the splendid garden, when an eminent former judge of the Pakistani Supreme Court shook my hands and said quickly, but sotto voce, ‘The blasts in Bombay were done with the approval of PM Nawaz Sharif’,” Dogra writes, adding the former judge said a sitting judge of the Supreme Court told him about it.

Dogra says he had “no reason to doubt a man of his eminence”, as the former judge had a “sterling reputation” and it was out of question that such a man would make a comment on the basis of “half-baked information”.

According to the author, as a judge, he “seemed to have been morally outraged that they should have been sanctioned at the highest level”.

The author also says that goes on to claim that Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif knew that Pakistani soldiers were occupying Kargil heights when he welcomed then Indian Prime Minister A B Vajpayee, who made the historic Delhi-Lahore bus ride.

“Close to the bus, Nawaz Sharif was looking distinctly uncomfortable as he bent to embrace Vajpayee. Sharif had reason to look sheepish as Pakistani soldiers were already occupying the heights in Kargil,” the book, published by Rupa, says.

In the book, Dogra says the Pakistan Army had planned a Kargil-type military operation much before the summer of 1999 when Benazir Bhutto was the prime minister but she stood her ground against the idea.

Dogra, a 1974-batch Indian Foreign Service officer who served as ambassador to Italy, Romania, Moldova, Albania and San Marino besides India’s permanent representative to the United Nations agencies based in Rome, terms Benazir as “liberal by temperament” and whose western education “had made her more receptive in her relationship with the outside world.”

“It is true that she was swayed by low-level intelligence gossip... But it is also a fact that on occasion she stood her ground against the army. This may have prevented the Kargil invasion at least once during her spell in office,” he says.

Quoting from an interview given by Benazir, Dogra goes to say how she dismissed the idea of Major General Pervez Musharraf, the then DGMO, about such an operation.

Though Musharraf painted a rosy picture of Pakistan winning the war and taking over Srinagar, Benazir apparently told him, “No, General, if I say that they (India) will tell ‘withdraw from Srinagar’. Don’t only withdraw from Srinagar but withdraw from Azad Kashmir too. Because under the UN resolution first the plebiscite – we have to withdraw even from Azad Kashmir where the plebiscite had to be held.”

Dogra says Benazir’s assertion was a “rare instance where a Pakistani leader took an army general to caution him against a misadventure.”

SHOCKING! 'Pak PM Nawaz Sharif gave approval for '93 Mumbai blasts' - Rediff.com India News
And NS even updated his statys on tweeter before bombay bombing.
 
Guess what.......nobody is surprized
 
Last edited:
So if someone or a group has a reason, they are allowed to kill other innocent people...
View attachment 232526

No..hence they are called militants and being hunted down..or being made to surrender.

There will be aggrieved parties and individuals in every country...there are millions I'm labor camps in china and north Korea for example. China executes close to 2000-2500 every year by firing squad..There are armed rebellious groups in the US A for .e.g.

What's extra special about Islamic terror groups is that they kill for no apparent reason or cause - (maybe just for their religious ideology and because that's their upbringing and the hate that is fed to them). They terrorise people out of sadistic pleasure.
 
It doesn't matter what Indian or Pakistanis say on this forum....news is gone in the world and if a Pakistani diplomat says something like this, it becomes more serious matter....
 
It doesn't matter what Indian or Pakistanis say on this forum....news is gone in the world and if a Pakistani diplomat says something like this, it becomes more serious matter....

It is an Indian diplomat, my friend. He is the one making the claims.
 
Mukti bahini are not terrorists.. just bcz they rise there arms to stop the tyranny of pak army and protect there women frm getting humilated by terrorist pak army doesn't make them terrorists...

People fighting for free Kashmir are not terrorists, jus bcoz they raise there arms to stop the tyranny of Indian army and protect there women from getting humilated by a terrorist Indian army doesn't make them terrorists... Feeling better now???
 
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif knew about the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts in advance and actually gave his approval for them, claims a new book by a former diplomat.

In his book, ‘Where Borders Bleed: An Insider’s Account of Indo-Pak Relations’ Rajiv Dogra, who was consul general of India in Karachi from 1992 to 1994, talks about a number of contentious issues between the two countries.

Covering historical, diplomatic and military perspectives in almost 70 years of conflict, the book chronicles the events leading up to Partition, reflects on the consequent strife, and provides a perspective on the figures who have shaped the story of this land -- from Lord Mountbatten and Muhammad Ali Jinnah to Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh.

He claims that a former Pakistan Supreme Court judge during a meeting in 1994 on the French chancery premises in Karachi, told him about the blasts.

“I had just walked into the splendid garden, when an eminent former judge of the Pakistani Supreme Court shook my hands and said quickly, but sotto voce, ‘The blasts in Bombay were done with the approval of PM Nawaz Sharif’,” Dogra writes, adding the former judge said a sitting judge of the Supreme Court told him about it.

Dogra says he had “no reason to doubt a man of his eminence”, as the former judge had a “sterling reputation” and it was out of question that such a man would make a comment on the basis of “half-baked information”.

According to the author, as a judge, he “seemed to have been morally outraged that they should have been sanctioned at the highest level”.

The author also says that goes on to claim that Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif knew that Pakistani soldiers were occupying Kargil heights when he welcomed then Indian Prime Minister A B Vajpayee, who made the historic Delhi-Lahore bus ride.

“Close to the bus, Nawaz Sharif was looking distinctly uncomfortable as he bent to embrace Vajpayee. Sharif had reason to look sheepish as Pakistani soldiers were already occupying the heights in Kargil,” the book, published by Rupa, says.

In the book, Dogra says the Pakistan Army had planned a Kargil-type military operation much before the summer of 1999 when Benazir Bhutto was the prime minister but she stood her ground against the idea.

Dogra, a 1974-batch Indian Foreign Service officer who served as ambassador to Italy, Romania, Moldova, Albania and San Marino besides India’s permanent representative to the United Nations agencies based in Rome, terms Benazir as “liberal by temperament” and whose western education “had made her more receptive in her relationship with the outside world.”

“It is true that she was swayed by low-level intelligence gossip... But it is also a fact that on occasion she stood her ground against the army. This may have prevented the Kargil invasion at least once during her spell in office,” he says.

Quoting from an interview given by Benazir, Dogra goes to say how she dismissed the idea of Major General Pervez Musharraf, the then DGMO, about such an operation.

Though Musharraf painted a rosy picture of Pakistan winning the war and taking over Srinagar, Benazir apparently told him, “No, General, if I say that they (India) will tell ‘withdraw from Srinagar’. Don’t only withdraw from Srinagar but withdraw from Azad Kashmir too. Because under the UN resolution first the plebiscite – we have to withdraw even from Azad Kashmir where the plebiscite had to be held.”

Dogra says Benazir’s assertion was a “rare instance where a Pakistani leader took an army general to caution him against a misadventure.”

SHOCKING! 'Pak PM Nawaz Sharif gave approval for '93 Mumbai blasts' - Rediff.com India News
Your diplomats are really good at writing bullshit. They should be given Oscar on writing crap.
 
Supa Powa caught red handed in terrorism against Pakistan seems Moditvas are on fire.

mehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh first your moditvas were shocked at reaction of Pakistan over your empty threats then came UN slap then Came BCC report on Indian terror funding against Pakistan
 
Another day another drama ... Afte the success of James Pigeon 007 ... Comes another epic .. Written by a retired indian "babu" .. Directed by indian media specially for indian population .. Coz apparently nobody outside india gives a ...k!
 
Entire spectrum of pakistan leadership knows and supports terrorist acts against indian civilians. There is nothing much india can do about. There are several factors to it major among them is 1971 military loss and feudal structure which wants to keep masses bogged down in hatred to occupy the power structure. (this is similar to indias vote bank politics to keep ppl in eternal poverty).

But the worrying fact is the response shown by india. They tend to be emotional and harp about history,cultural links....etc. India should follow a cold-blooded logic and demand quantitative results when talks are held. Vajpayee, Gujral may all make good leaders inside country but their foreign policy was nothing but disaster.

Demand for prosecution of lakhvi and not having talks until then is a right step in that direction.
 
Back
Top Bottom