Plenty of evidence to say the contrary but I'm not going to go into it. It's old news.
This is what UN Human rights had to say about it.
IV. OVERVIEW OF THE ATTACKS AGAINST MUSLIMS
State and Police Participation and Complicity
On the morning of February 27, 2002, the gruesome attack on the Sabarmati Express in Godhra, Gujarat, left fifty-eight dead. The train cars set alight were carrying Hindu
kar sevaks (religious volunteers) returning from Ayodhya. By evening, retaliatory attacks against Muslims had begun, including in Rajkot, Vadodara, and Bharuch.
50 That same day the Vishwa Hindu Parishad called for a statewide
bandh (shut-down) for February 28, a call that according to press reports, its cadre interpreted as a call to action.
51 The state's endorsement of the bandh, announced through a press note issued at 8 p.m. on February 27, was taken by the VHP/Bajrang Dal as an endorsement of its stand.
52
State support of the bandh also sent a message to the police. A reporter for the
Hindu observed that, "In such a situation, the police would always be hesitant to act lest it hurt the interests of the political bosses. And the saffronised police also found a common cause with the criminals to `punish' the minorities."
53 The same reporter wrote that, "insiders in the Bharatiya Janata Party admit that the police were under instructions from the Narendra Modi administration not to act firmly."
54
By the afternoon of February 27, retaliatory attacks had already begun, including the stabbing of a Muslim man in Vadodara railway station as crowds gathered awaiting the arrival of the Sabarmati Express.
55Starting on the morning of February 28, Hindu mobs unleashed a coordinated attack against Muslims in many of Gujarat's towns and cities.
56 Despite the state's claims that police were simply overwhelmed by the sheer size of the Hindu mobs-often numbering in the thousands-evidence collected by the media, Indian human rights groups, and Human Rights Watch all point to state sponsorship of the attacks. Eyewitness accounts cited throughout this report, as well as the history of police and political recruitment demonstrate the state's partisan role. In a matter of days, over 850 people are known to have been killed-although unofficial estimates are as high as 2,000. Violence continued as of this writing and has quickly spread to poorly protected rural areas. Accounts of politicians directing the violence are also commonplace. Furthermore, in many cases, police posts and police stations were in close proximity to affected sites.
57
https://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/india/India0402-03.htm
Oh? So having lynch mob is the standard of helping Harbis, but attacking a Muslim country, killing millions of innocent muslim, bombing wedding parties from sky, raping and burning muslim families in their home, being proud of it and singing song about that, asking Muslims to cut the beard, not to look muslim, not to offer Azaan, not to celebrate eid, imprisoning them for just being muslim, 're-educating' them and ... the list may go on quite for long -- is all fine and dandy and not an issue at all, right?
BTW, the entire thread is filled with quite a few of those said violations. Want me to quote them?
Sir OP mentioned Shia and we are just discussing that Waseem Rizvi is a traitor and don't represents Shias of India.