What's new

Shashi tharoor destroys british again

You don't have to be BJP to be nationalistic or ultra conservative.
My point was that he supports what the BJP Gov is doing in Kashmir however turns a blind eye to other human rights abuses by the BJP Gov. He is double minded and only see one side of the picture.
 
.
My point was that he supports what the BJP Gov is doing in Kashmir however turns a blind eye to other human rights abuses by the BJP Gov. He is double minded and only see one side of the picture.
Don't forget, what the BJP government is doing in Kashmir is exactly what all the other governments have been doing. There hasn't been a drastic change on how things are conducted in Kashmir for a long time now. Things like the pellet guns and stuff may be brought up regularly, but those are changes aimed for the benefit of security and would've happened regardless of the ruling party. Same goes for all the terrorists killed; they would've been killed regardless of the government.
 
.
Don't forget, what the BJP government is doing in Kashmir is exactly what all the other governments have been doing. There hasn't been a drastic change on how things are conducted in Kashmir for a long time now. Things like the pellet guns and stuff may be brought up regularly, but those are changes aimed for the benefit of security and would've happened regardless of the ruling party. Same goes for all the terrorists killed; they would've been killed regardless of the government.
During Mamomhan era things took a turn for the good from both sides. This wasn’t long ago.
 
.
During Mamomhan era things took a turn for the good from both sides. This wasn’t long ago.
Did India's Kashmir policy change though? If there was peace in Kashmir, that just seems to be circumstantial peace. Burhan Wani's death accounted for some of the recent clashes. Hypothetically, he could've died around Manmohan's time the results would've been the same.
 
.
@Kaptaan
churchill had abject apathy towards Islam as well.

Winston Churchill 1899: “Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

I had to re-check that with snopes (fact checking website - found it to be true.

https://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/churchillislam.asp

also he (Churchill) was instrumental in getting Jews into Palestinian lands arguing that the Jews will make the desert bloom
one such gem:
"I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."

more here:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ihWyeQchBScC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=palestine+royal+commission+report+churchill+red+indians&source=bl&ots=fqe10nKhWa&sig=GcbUowychoxzbRVPV9CYbqkB1T8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=quhAVFji1e4G_ceAsAU#v=onepage&q=palestine royal commission report churchill red indians&f=false
Churchil didnt fuk with us ... so he aint our enemy..

However the british east indian company did betray and fuk the muslim rule over sub continent... and in the end in the late 18th century and early 1900s occupied out country... and gave military jobs as incentive to local people.. whom they considered war - like...

However in india.. they ended up with massacres and genocides..
 
.
Tharoor is a "scumbag" as stated so eloquently by @DESERT FIGHTER He is making up history with the theme "India, perfect India, India, rich India, India, centre of universe India" and the fable that if the British had not arrived India today would have been another USA.

The truth is if the British had not arrived there would have been no India. That is a fact. As much as if British had not arrived in Australia there would have been no Australia.

And he blabbers all that cock in perfect Oxbridge accent as well.. The irony.. Bloody Hypocrite
 
. .
oh please lol nobody cares
Suddenly everything isn't as bright when shown a mirror, right?

If our opposition elected Mr Tharoor as the PM candidate every educated,rational Indians will surely vote for Congress.
Even PM Modi like this guy.
A genuis indeed.



That is why he worked in UN as under secretary General ,and if US didnt vote for Mr Moon he would have been Secretary General.
Nice logic
I differ with you that everyone will vote for him to be our PM.
I like this guy, hes probably the best orator out of India and I would like to see him a permanent representative to UN or in some major position in the MEA, maybe even minister but certainly not as PM.
A PM has to be someone who can connect with masses but this is the same guy who called common people the cattle class. He cant connect with a common Indian.
Being a good orator doesn't mean that you would automatically be a good politician.
I would love to see him in our MEA but certainly not as PM.

My point was that he supports what the BJP Gov is doing in Kashmir however turns a blind eye to other human rights abuses by the BJP Gov. He is double minded and only see one side of the picture.
No he doesn't support BJP but since we are all Indians so he doesn't behave like an idiot like Rahul Gandhi and cry in front of foreign media and defends the stand of the govt on foreign soil and challenges the same stance in parliament.
That's not hypocrite, just looking out for the national interest.
 
.
Suddenly everything isn't as bright when shown a mirror, right?


I differ with you that everyone will vote for him to be our PM.
I like this guy, hes probably the best orator out of India and I would like to see him a permanent representative to UN or in some major position in the MEA, maybe even minister but certainly not as PM.
A PM has to be someone who can connect with masses but this is the same guy who called common people the cattle class. He cant connect with a common Indian.
Being a good orator doesn't mean that you would automatically be a good politician.
I would love to see him in our MEA but certainly not as PM.


No he doesn't support BJP but since we are all Indians so he doesn't behave like an idiot like Rahul Gandhi and cry in front of foreign media and defends the stand of the govt on foreign soil and challenges the same stance in parliament.
That's not hypocrite, just looking out for the national interest.

Mirror looks pretty good to me lol
 
. . .
And then 26/11 happend..
You forget 08 July 2016 or the several hundred days of black outs by the Indian Gov.
Treat your nationals like humans and not trash.

No he doesn't support BJP but since we are all Indians so he doesn't behave like an idiot like Rahul Gandhi and cry in front of foreign media and defends the stand of the govt on foreign soil and challenges the same stance in parliament.
That's not hypocrite, just looking out for the national interest.
Good point, sticking up for national interest.
 
. . .
And he blabbers all that cock in perfect Oxbridge accent as well.. The irony.. Bloody Hypocrite

Lol :lol:
He is the most neutral Indian in that case .
Majority others are even nationalist than him.
First unified Bharat was established by Mauryan dynasty ,then its gone .
Now we are the one follow that rich culture
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom