What's new

Shah Rukh and Salman ‘hurt Hindu sentiments’, claims lawsuit

Please stop going off tangent .

point to where i went off tangent... it is you doing that by bringing "muslim bloodthirstyness" and trying to make diversion from the op topic.

1. P.K. was not banned in India . It grossed 350 crores only in India . If for you every hindu is sanghi i cannot help you . Maybe only Muslims and Christians watched the movie according to you .

again the going back to square one.

where did i claim that only muslims and christians watched "pk"??

2. What a few f*cking sanghis do is get some media publicity stunt and some drama . I hate them and their ilks .

if you do then make it loud and clear on this thread. :)

and sanghis are not few... they are not "fringe groups" at all.

They are trying to make Hinduism into a Abrahamic religion when it never was and will never be . Their will never be one set of code that hindus will follow nor a particular book . They should stop trying to be our advocates . We are good on our own

here's how one abrahamic religion brought relief and progress to the females of the world, especially india[1]...
When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.
read this carefully... note that the article was written by a lady from another abrahamic religion... read the rest of that thread, plus when you finally answer my first post in this thread and consider a few other socialist things which have been spoken of numerous times, you will see that this abrahamic religion brought laws and a system that was superior to anything that existed in india prior to its coming... this cannot be denied, unless at the point of stubborn-ness.


3. Neither russians killed charlie hebdo employees nor Kazakhstan people are baying for blood of borat actor so again your point is moot .

why are you going round and round??

my posted article clearly says...

1. the russians want charlie hebdo staff to be extradicted to russia and be judged there.

2. anyone in russia wearing t-shirts in support of charlie hebdo to be jailed.

3. any editor in russia in sympathy with charlie hebdo to be punished.

plus i have said that russians don't need to take direct action against charlie hebdo because the russian government is a government and is in sync with the rest of the parliament and the people against charlie hebdo.


---

[1] prenups in indian weddings and islam
 
.
point to where i went off tangent... it is you doing that by bringing "muslim bloodthirstyness" and trying to make diversion from the op topic.



again the going back to square one.

where did i claim that only muslims and christians watched "pk"??



if you do then make it loud and clear on this thread. :)

and sanghis are not few... they are not "fringe groups" at all.



here's how one abrahamic religion brought relief and progress to the females of the world, especially india[1]...

read this carefully... note that the article was written by a lady from another abrahamic religion... read the rest of that thread, plus when you finally answer my first post in this thread and consider a few other socialist things which have been spoken of numerous times, you will see that this abrahamic religion brought laws and a system that was superior to anything that existed in india prior to its coming... this cannot be denied, unless at the point of stubborn-ness.




why are you going round and round??

my posted article clearly says...

1. the russians want charlie hebdo staff to be extradicted to russia and be judged there.

2. anyone in russia wearing t-shirts in support of charlie hebdo to be jailed.

3. any editor in russia in sympathy with charlie hebdo to be punished.

plus i have said that russians don't need to take direct action against charlie hebdo because the russian government is a government and is in sync with the rest of the parliament and the people against charlie hebdo.


---

[1] prenups in indian weddings and islam

Will reply in detail tomorrow . Going offline today . Booked the space .
 
. .
ok, we know India's many problems (both small and big) are causing you much discomfort, so which country would you like to relocate to ?

post reported for malicious editing.

and why don't you get a bjp central minister to declare in the uno general assembly that you and your sanghi friends don't want india to improve?? :)
 
.
post reported for malicious editing.

and why don't you get a bjp central minister to declare in the uno general assembly that you and your sanghi friends don't want india to improve?? :)
eh, what "malicious" editing ? :what:

you use that as a slur but I'm not in the sangh, nor am I offended, and I do want India to improve.

now answer, it's clearly shite here, so where is it better where you, jamahir, will be happy ? not anywhere in the US or any NATO countries clearly, not Cuba anymore either, Libya has been overrun by islamist jihadis, RUssia isn't commie anymore, the DPRK wont let you step foot inside (or maybe temporarily, under extreme surveillance and only for a short period after which they kick you out) .. so where, then ?
 
.
1. You listed 3 incidents . 3 is not many .

in all the cases perpetrators are behind the bar . Our justice system is rock solid . Anybody who takes law in their own hands or breaks the law will be punished with full severity of law .



Absolutely . There is no mass savagery . I can show you mass savagery in the cases of Prophets drawing , Innocence of Muslims , charlie hebdo etc .



your telling anything does not matter .
Don't you think each and every person life is more important, what value you are giving these dead men... when you are saaying 3 is not many... you can't blame every Indian muslims just because something happened in France or somewhere else.... Do you want more incidents like Dadri?
 
.
eh, what "malicious" editing ? :what:

where did i include the :argh: emoticon in my post?? you quoted my post, replaced all the text with that emoticon so that you could taunt me and excuse yourself from replying logically to my previous post and the remaining posts of mine in this thread.

you use that as a slur but I'm not in the sangh, nor am I offended, and I do want India to improve.

gau8av miyan, but you also don't post against the sangh.

now answer, it's clearly shite here, so where is it better where you, jamahir, will be happy ? not anywhere in the US or any NATO countries clearly, not Cuba anymore either, Libya has been overrun by islamist jihadis, RUssia isn't commie anymore, the DPRK wont let you step foot inside (or maybe temporarily, under extreme surveillance and only for a short period after which they kick you out) .. so where, then ?

how about you say that to those politicans who want to turn bombay into shanghai and bangalore into singapore??

and would you have said that to the late and assassinated govind pansare and to the late farmer gajendra singh too??

Don't you think each and every person life is more important, what value you are giving these dead men... when you are saaying 3 is not many... you can't blame every Indian muslims just because something happened in France or somewhere else.... Do you want more incidents like Dadri?

that is what i don't understand about these nationalists.

once @gslv mk3 replied to my point of india being "suicide capital of the world" with "oh, but you should look at the suicide percentages in our neighborhood"... he cleanly washed away the 200,000+ suicides that happen in india each year.

even one unjust death should not be tolerated.
 
Last edited:
.
And people being lynched and being beaten on rumors of beef eating or possessing are acts of love?

Its Vedic form of Love. We mere mortals are not yet developed enough to understand Vedic wisdom.
 
.
where did i include the :argh: emoticon in my post?? you quoted my post, replaced all the text with that emoticon so that you could taunt me and excuse yourself from replying logically to my previous post and the remaining posts of mine in this thread.
:lol:

I'll explain, I went through one post of your, then another, and then another.. and all I saw was ranting and didn't want to nitpick any particular thing you said but ask you a simple question based on it all.

itne dukhi ho yahan, aisa koi to mulk hoga jahan reh ke aap ka dil khush hoga ? :-)

miyan, but you also don't post against the sangh.

to give you a bit of an analogy, they're like the tea party evangelical crazies in the states.. they're fringe, some hold extremist views, basically far right people anywhere on earth are kind of the same, a few of them might have murdered some people too (and they should be thrown in jail) but they're not ISIS, they're pests.

I don't subscribe to any religion based nonsense, completely irreligious (don't have time for that garbage) beef is tasty :agree:, and I'm against any and all bans, govt should stay the hell out of people's private lives.

how about you say that to those politicans who want to turn bombay into shanghai and bangalore into singapore??

and would you have said that to the late and assassinated govind pansare and to the late farmer gajendra singh too??
why would I ? those politicians are only saying that we must improve and strive to make here as good as there, they're not saying they hate it here.

I'm not in favor of political assassinations, and farmer suicides are but one of many thousands of problems that plague our land, it's the 3rd world, a billion people.. you'll go (already gone?) crazy if this kind of stuff bothers you so much.

now answer, where on earth would you like to relocate to, to escape the hell that is India ? :partay:
 
.
india's economic/social system based on extreme capitalism and interest-accounting that these buffoons called "akhil bharat hindu mahasabha" promote and defend, has hurt muslim sentiments and has been the anti-human system the cause for millions of suicides, female infanticide/foeticides, dowry murders, "honor killings", caste discrimination etc since 1947.

someone please file a counter-case against "akhil bharat hindu mahasabha".
Why don't you file a case against them?
 
.
:lol:

I'll explain, I went through one post of your, then another, and then another.. and all I saw was ranting and didn't want to nitpick any particular thing you said but ask you a simple question based on it all.

itne dukhi ho yahan, aisa koi to mulk hoga jahan reh ke aap ka dil khush hoga ? :-)

here is gajendra singh ranting and raging from the tree which would soon become his death...

farmer-1.jpg


go ask his ghost which country he wants to relocate to.

to give you a bit of an analogy, they're like the tea party evangelical crazies in the states.. they're fringe, some hold extremist views, basically far right people anywhere on earth are kind of the same, a few of them might have murdered some people too (and they should be thrown in jail) but they're not ISIS, they're pests.

isis and taliban ke baap aur maa hain sangh ke groups.


---

you are simply deviating from the topic of the op.

Why don't you file a case against them?

why don't you??
 
. .
Probably because I am not the one whose advocating a counter case?

are you not bothered by their existence, let alone them having the freedom to file frivolous cases while india continues to majorly have a anti-human political/social/economic system??
 
.
are you not bothered by their existence, let alone them having the freedom to file frivolous cases while india continues to majorly have a anti-human political/social/economic system??
Nopes, not at all. My daily dose of drama. If it bothers you so much, why not walk the talk?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom