jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Please stop going off tangent .
point to where i went off tangent... it is you doing that by bringing "muslim bloodthirstyness" and trying to make diversion from the op topic.
1. P.K. was not banned in India . It grossed 350 crores only in India . If for you every hindu is sanghi i cannot help you . Maybe only Muslims and Christians watched the movie according to you .
again the going back to square one.
where did i claim that only muslims and christians watched "pk"??
2. What a few f*cking sanghis do is get some media publicity stunt and some drama . I hate them and their ilks .
if you do then make it loud and clear on this thread.
and sanghis are not few... they are not "fringe groups" at all.
They are trying to make Hinduism into a Abrahamic religion when it never was and will never be . Their will never be one set of code that hindus will follow nor a particular book . They should stop trying to be our advocates . We are good on our own
here's how one abrahamic religion brought relief and progress to the females of the world, especially india[1]...
read this carefully... note that the article was written by a lady from another abrahamic religion... read the rest of that thread, plus when you finally answer my first post in this thread and consider a few other socialist things which have been spoken of numerous times, you will see that this abrahamic religion brought laws and a system that was superior to anything that existed in india prior to its coming... this cannot be denied, unless at the point of stubborn-ness.When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.
3. Neither russians killed charlie hebdo employees nor Kazakhstan people are baying for blood of borat actor so again your point is moot .
why are you going round and round??
my posted article clearly says...
1. the russians want charlie hebdo staff to be extradicted to russia and be judged there.
2. anyone in russia wearing t-shirts in support of charlie hebdo to be jailed.
3. any editor in russia in sympathy with charlie hebdo to be punished.
plus i have said that russians don't need to take direct action against charlie hebdo because the russian government is a government and is in sync with the rest of the parliament and the people against charlie hebdo.
---
[1] prenups in indian weddings and islam