What's new

Setback for Indian missile programme

That actuator was probably the only part that was Indian made :laughcry:
 
.
View attachment 444840

INDIAN WEAPONS TEST FAILS.
Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
ds.jpg




Indians after fail test be like - Lets maintain resolve ,pillar is the failure of success :D
4t6y7.jpg


Both are tested systems.
This failure is a good sign that they're trying something new.
View attachment 444843View attachment 444844
K-4-SLBM-India-IDRW.jpg


K4, it's been successfully tested several times, first failure.
QRSAM was also tested twice successfully this year.


chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?:D
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong :enjoy:
 
.
chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?:D
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong :enjoy:


Why are you even questioning those successes when India actually openly tells you their failures? When it can just hide them like most countries? Yes, there are several developmental trials, then users trials nothing new.
 
. .
Why are you even questioning those successes when India actually openly tells you their failures? When it can just hide them like most countries? Yes, there are several developmental trials, then users trials nothing new.
come on man,telling openly?how many mainstream newspaper of your have reported it?
and you should not tell me that,you should teach your own people those differences when they claim they have successful all weather functional systems.
i saw a report(probably from 2011) here about your ABM project where a guy very passionately tried to "prove"(more like cry) that by 2016-17 india will have thousands of ABM covering their population and cities.he even went to great length to educate people about what is the difference between ICBM defense system and theater defense system :D so tell me,is it covering your population and cities right now?i am checking the time and it is 26-12-2017 morning :D
You sound like a sane man who knows things,may be you should really stop your own people claiming hilarious things and remind them they are in PDF. :D
what say? :enjoy:
 
.
come on man,telling openly?how many mainstream newspaper of your have reported it?
and you should not tell me that,you should teach your own people those differences when they claim they have successful all weather functional systems.
i saw a report(probably from 2011) here about your ABM project where a guy very passionately tried to "prove"(more like cry) that by 2016-17 india will have thousands of ABM covering their population and cities.he even went to great length to educate people about what is the difference between ICBM defense system and theater defense system :D so tell me,is it covering your population and cities right now?i am checking the time and it is 26-12-2017 morning :D
You sound like a sane man who knows things,may be you should really stop your own people claiming hilarious things and remind them they are in PDF. :D
what say? :enjoy:


yawn.png
f u talkin about?
 
. .
Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
View attachment 444872



Indians after fail test be like - Lets maintain resolve ,pillar is the failure of success :D
View attachment 444873






chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?:D
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong :enjoy:

LOL

Hala'r po hala! Trust a Bangladeshi to take the Mickey so effectively! LOVED those visuals!!

On a serious note, different parameters are tested, sequentially, not in parallel, to be able to isolate data sets that show the specific condition of what is being tested. Sorry for this outburst of pseudo-sciento-bumff; best I could do, considering I'm almost a decade and a half away from systems work.
 
.
If you're talking about the Dhanush, it was a faulty designed of the barrel which they corrected soon after but if it is about the M777, it wasn't about the an oversized shell but they used an outdated ammunition which likely caused the barrel burst
I thought you blamed it on the imported Chinese bearing? :rofl:

That actuator was probably the only part that was Indian made :laughcry:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
View attachment 444872



Indians after fail test be like - Lets maintain resolve ,pillar is the failure of success :D
View attachment 444873






chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?:D
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong :enjoy:
Indians would jump like monkeys at the slightest achievement...it's just the Hindu way. Well judging by their weapons failure rates, their products are most likely worse than Chinese made weapons.
 
.
If you bothered to read the details, you won't be making such an ignorant (jahilana) comment. The missile got stuck in the canister.
If you knew how complicated the K4 canister is and its pretty unique mechanism, you wouldn't make such a jahilana post.
In any case, a canister is not an artillery barrel. Especially when it's underwater.

test itself is the sign that they are trying something new.. failure is only a sign that they didn't get this new thing right.
Tests could be just for varying parameters or a change in technology and structure.
 
Last edited:
.
yawn.png
f u talkin about?
the most obvious question,isn't it?keep an eye on your people rather than what other posts and you will know it :Dcorrect them in their hallucination.that will do it for now :partay:

LOL

Hala'r po hala! Trust a Bangladeshi to take the Mickey so effectively! LOVED those visuals!!

On a serious note, different parameters are tested, sequentially, not in parallel, to be able to isolate data sets that show the specific condition of what is being tested. Sorry for this outburst of pseudo-sciento-bumff; best I could do, considering I'm almost a decade and a half away from systems work.
ore halar put madari,ami jodi effectively loitam taile atokkhone gojob hoiya jaito. :D
if i would have taken you "effectively" there would be another kinda situation,trust me,you can ask from your people,they know me. :partay:
you trolled,so did i,nothing serious,just chill :enjoy:

I thought you blamed it on the imported Chinese bearing? :rofl:


:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:


Indians would jump like monkeys at the slightest achievement...it's just the Hindu way. Well judging by their weapons failure rates, their products are most likely worse than Chinese made weapons.
you dare to insult vedic people saying "hindu way"?you dare?
have you ever heard of vimana technology?
just look at SU-27 or MIG-29 vimana,how well those plane do yoga move in the sky,it is called Hari Hari yoga maneuver :D
get educated man,vedic education is a must,you should know endoo valley chubbylization is grandmother of all chubbylization,we are proud part of it :partay:
 
. . . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom