Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
Both are tested systems.
This failure is a good sign that they're trying something new.
View attachment 444843View attachment 444844
K4, it's been successfully tested several times, first failure.
QRSAM was also tested twice successfully this year.
chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong
come on man,telling openly?how many mainstream newspaper of your have reported it?Why are you even questioning those successes when India actually openly tells you their failures? When it can just hide them like most countries? Yes, there are several developmental trials, then users trials nothing new.
come on man,telling openly?how many mainstream newspaper of your have reported it?
and you should not tell me that,you should teach your own people those differences when they claim they have successful all weather functional systems.
i saw a report(probably from 2011) here about your ABM project where a guy very passionately tried to "prove"(more like cry) that by 2016-17 india will have thousands of ABM covering their population and cities.he even went to great length to educate people about what is the difference between ICBM defense system and theater defense system so tell me,is it covering your population and cities right now?i am checking the time and it is 26-12-2017 morning
You sound like a sane man who knows things,may be you should really stop your own people claiming hilarious things and remind them they are in PDF.
what say?
Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
View attachment 444872
Indians after fail test be like - Lets maintain resolve ,pillar is the failure of success
View attachment 444873
chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong
I thought you blamed it on the imported Chinese bearing?If you're talking about the Dhanush, it was a faulty designed of the barrel which they corrected soon after but if it is about the M777, it wasn't about the an oversized shell but they used an outdated ammunition which likely caused the barrel burst
That actuator was probably the only part that was Indian made
Indians would jump like monkeys at the slightest achievement...it's just the Hindu way. Well judging by their weapons failure rates, their products are most likely worse than Chinese made weapons.Indians after "successful" test when trolling others
View attachment 444872
Indians after fail test be like - Lets maintain resolve ,pillar is the failure of success
View attachment 444873
chill man,just chill
i am totally sure they are just retesting it again,to see if it can fly well
btw i wonder under which condition those "successful" test were conducted,any report?
pardon me,as far as i know ,no country test same missile "several times" in a year that has already been tested "Several times in all weather condition". just saying,i might be totally wrong
If you knew how complicated the K4 canister is and its pretty unique mechanism, you wouldn't make such a jahilana post.If you bothered to read the details, you won't be making such an ignorant (jahilana) comment. The missile got stuck in the canister.
Tests could be just for varying parameters or a change in technology and structure.test itself is the sign that they are trying something new.. failure is only a sign that they didn't get this new thing right.
the most obvious question,isn't it?keep an eye on your people rather than what other posts and you will know it correct them in their hallucination.that will do it for nowf u talkin about?
ore halar put madari,ami jodi effectively loitam taile atokkhone gojob hoiya jaito.LOL
Hala'r po hala! Trust a Bangladeshi to take the Mickey so effectively! LOVED those visuals!!
On a serious note, different parameters are tested, sequentially, not in parallel, to be able to isolate data sets that show the specific condition of what is being tested. Sorry for this outburst of pseudo-sciento-bumff; best I could do, considering I'm almost a decade and a half away from systems work.
you dare to insult vedic people saying "hindu way"?you dare?I thought you blamed it on the imported Chinese bearing?
Indians would jump like monkeys at the slightest achievement...it's just the Hindu way. Well judging by their weapons failure rates, their products are most likely worse than Chinese made weapons.
Failures are the pillars of success.Pillar is the failure of success.
ow,my bad,i totally messed it up,thank you for correcting meFailures are the pillars of success.
No problem! It's quite easy to make such typosow,my bad,i totally messed it up,thank you for correcting me
it really isNo problem! It's quite easy to make such typos