Iska LUMS me daakhila karwao.Jesus Christ, dude. What witch-doctor do you get your meds from? Even hakeems and homeopaths come certified these days.
@Olympus81 , any ideas?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iska LUMS me daakhila karwao.Jesus Christ, dude. What witch-doctor do you get your meds from? Even hakeems and homeopaths come certified these days.
@Olympus81 , any ideas?
Agree to disagree.
Bhai ke aage LUMS kiya cheez he? Bhai log 11th plane of existence me wajood rakhte hn. Jo maryam nawaz ke bhi wehm-o-gumaan me nhi hota, ye Imran khan pe daal dete hn. PDM ko aaj tak aik ghari hi mili he, lekin bhai sab ne Mona Lisa chori krne ka ilzam bhi Imran Khan par kayi dafa lgaya hoga.Iska LUMS me daakhila karwao.
Faiz Isa knows the answer, but does he have the guts to probe the role of the military establishment or go against US govt?
It's bigger than Faiz Isa. He can call the foreign office staff and translation and start the investigation but he can t. Do you think he will send even a questionnaire to Lu. ? lolllll ...he knows the shoe is oversize ...The real question here is not one of guts, but of the Constitutional demarcations between the three branches of government. The burden on the petitioner here is showing that the complaint is about a judicial matter and not an executive one, and he has failed to meet that burden. Clearly.
It's bigger than Faiz Isa. He can call the foreign office staff and translation and start the investigation but he can t. Do you think he will send even a questionnaire to Lu. ? lolllll ...he knows the shoe is oversize ...
Pakistan worked without FM for ages when Nawaz took over this portfolio and caused massive damage ... the demarcations between the three branches not in Pakistan. Even today Pak has no FM, the policy comes from Pindi.What is bigger here is the respect for the demarcations between the three branches. Just becasue a previous idiot overreached in putting the SC in the middle of dam(n) fund raising does not mean the Justices can barge in everywhere they feel like.
Pakistan worked without FM for ages when Nawaz took over this portfolio and caused massive damage ... the demarcations between the three branches not in Pakistan. Even today Pak has no FM, the policy comes from Pindi.
Failed democratic institutions left space for others.... but still, Faiz Isa is not capable enough to hear this case ...he simply escape... plus he is compromised after a money laundering case of millions of pounds.The policy comes from Pindi, I agree, but that is because of their illegal supra-Constitutional role they have usurped for themselves. Others, unfortunately, must work under the Constitution, or as directed by Pindi. And thus the situation that we do have here.
Failed democratic institutions left space for others.... but still, Faiz Isa is not capable enough to hear this case ...he simply escape... plus he is compromised after a money laundering case of millions of pounds.
Not really. In most parliamentary democracies, the judicial branch can and does head committees tasked to investigate an issue. JITs are fairly common in India and other westminoster style democracies FYI. So this is not an issue about demarcation but who would be able to lead a credible committee and the only branch that could is the judicial one given change of govts and politics involved.The real question here is not one of guts, but of the Constitutional demarcations between the three branches of government. The burden on the petitioner here is showing that the complaint is about a judicial matter and not an executive one, and he has failed to meet that burden. Clearly.
Nothing to do with separation of powers. If it is, please explain how exactlyNot really. In most parliamentary democracies, the judicial branch can and does head committees tasked to investigate an issue. JITs are fairly common in India and other westminoster style democracies FYI. So this is not an issue about demarcation but who would be able to lead a credible committee and the only branch that could is the judicial one given change of govts and politics involved.
Not really. In most parliamentary democracies, the judicial branch can and does head committees tasked to investigate an issue. JITs are fairly common in India and other westminoster style democracies FYI. So this is not an issue about demarcation but who would be able to lead a credible committee and the only branch that could is the judicial one given change of govts and politics involved.
You can search all the JITs conducted by European countries and see how it works.Okay, given that premise, could you please help with the legal framework and its Constitutional bases such a JIT would work in Pakistan, such as who initiates it, who heads it and how does it work without violating the mandated divisions? Thanks.