What's new

Saudi journalist: If Muslims despise the ‘infidel’ West, Why are they so eager to live there?

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Saudi journalist: If Muslims despise the ‘infidel’ West, Why are they so eager to live there?

In his July 8, 2018 column in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh slams Arab and African Muslim immigrants who choose to live in the West and even risk their lives to reach it, yet express hatred and contempt towards the West and regard it as infidel.

Sheikh-880x495.jpg

Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh

(January 13, 2019 / MEMRI) In his July 8, 2018 column in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh slams Arab and African Muslim immigrants who choose to live in the West and even risk their lives to reach it, yet express hatred and contempt towards the West and regard it as infidel. He criticizes in particular the ingratitude of mosque imams in Europe, some of whom are immigrants themselves, who abuse the democracy and free speech in their host countries by inciting against the West. In light of this, says Aal Al-Sheikh, the European right’s opposition to immigration is justifiable, for it is only natural to oppose the influx of immigrants who are “steeped to the bone in a culture of hostility and hatred.”

The following are excerpts from his article:[1]

“Immigrants cast themselves into the waters of the Mediterranean knowing full well that the chance of reaching their destination, the northern shore, is slim. They nevertheless risk [the journey], taking advantage of the instability in Libya, which has become the [immigrants’] point of departure on their way to the European paradise. But what is strange, and perhaps even embarrassing, is that, if you ask them about the infidel West, they will spew curses and invective, call it ignorant, and [express] contempt for it. So why do they cast themselves into its bosom and risk their lives to reach it? I truly fail to understand this reasoning, which is so warped, rotten and paradoxical that it seems sickening and ridiculous at the same time.

“The embarrassment becomes even more acute when one hears certain mosque imams in Europe, some of whom are foreigners and immigrants themselves, abusing the democracy and free speech that are granted to everyone [in those countries] by becoming expert at directing curses and invective at the infidels using [various] skillfully-phrased expressions.

“When the populist right in Europe demands to stop and fight immigration, even by means of military force, this evokes cries of outrage from the Arabs and Muslims there. They accuse those who make this demand of racism and hatred for the other, and – most ludicrously – [claim] that the West is undemocratic. Let me say this loud and clear: I do not blame [the Europeans]. In fact, if I were European, I would not hesitate for a moment to oppose this immigration and reject these people, whose culture is based on the duty to hate the non-Muslim, and examples [of this] in their heritage are numerous and varied… The Arabs, and especially the extremist Muslims among them, are steeped to the bone in a culture of hostility and hatred.

“These conflicting sentiments – of hatred [for the West], but [a willingness] to risk one’s most precious possession, one’s life, in order to live among those hated societies and enjoy the comfort, security, stability and prosperity [they offer] – require a psycho-social investigation… Some people justify [this attitude], saying that [the Europeans] are racist xenophobes and are enemies of Islam and the Muslims. [But] for the sake of reason and honesty, put yourself in their place. Would any Arab country open its doors wide to Christian foreigners and [even] allow them to work in it? The answer is definitely not. So why do you demand that others treat [you] differently than you treat them?…

“All that is left to say is that the wave of populism currently sweeping the Western societies is justified, since it is [simply] a response in kind…”

[1] Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), July 8, 2018.

https://www.jns.org/saudi-journalis...del-west-why-are-they-so-eager-to-live-there/
 
. .
Because the west destroyed their countries?

Well, you are Iraqi, so you have the right to say that.

Explains the entire refugee influx from:
(Iraq, Syria, Libya)

The Arab Spring, which led to the refugee influx, was supported by the United States during the administration of former U.S. President Barack 'Nobel Peace Prize' Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary 'Benghazi' Clinton.

The Arabs should have fled to the United States as revenge.
 
Last edited:
.
Saudi journalist: If Muslims despise the ‘infidel’ West, Why are they so eager to live there?

In his July 8, 2018 column in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh slams Arab and African Muslim immigrants who choose to live in the West and even risk their lives to reach it, yet express hatred and contempt towards the West and regard it as infidel.

Sheikh-880x495.jpg

Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh

(January 13, 2019 / MEMRI) In his July 8, 2018 column in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh slams Arab and African Muslim immigrants who choose to live in the West and even risk their lives to reach it, yet express hatred and contempt towards the West and regard it as infidel. He criticizes in particular the ingratitude of mosque imams in Europe, some of whom are immigrants themselves, who abuse the democracy and free speech in their host countries by inciting against the West. In light of this, says Aal Al-Sheikh, the European right’s opposition to immigration is justifiable, for it is only natural to oppose the influx of immigrants who are “steeped to the bone in a culture of hostility and hatred.”

The following are excerpts from his article:[1]

“Immigrants cast themselves into the waters of the Mediterranean knowing full well that the chance of reaching their destination, the northern shore, is slim. They nevertheless risk [the journey], taking advantage of the instability in Libya, which has become the [immigrants’] point of departure on their way to the European paradise. But what is strange, and perhaps even embarrassing, is that, if you ask them about the infidel West, they will spew curses and invective, call it ignorant, and [express] contempt for it. So why do they cast themselves into its bosom and risk their lives to reach it? I truly fail to understand this reasoning, which is so warped, rotten and paradoxical that it seems sickening and ridiculous at the same time.

“The embarrassment becomes even more acute when one hears certain mosque imams in Europe, some of whom are foreigners and immigrants themselves, abusing the democracy and free speech that are granted to everyone [in those countries] by becoming expert at directing curses and invective at the infidels using [various] skillfully-phrased expressions.

“When the populist right in Europe demands to stop and fight immigration, even by means of military force, this evokes cries of outrage from the Arabs and Muslims there. They accuse those who make this demand of racism and hatred for the other, and – most ludicrously – [claim] that the West is undemocratic. Let me say this loud and clear: I do not blame [the Europeans]. In fact, if I were European, I would not hesitate for a moment to oppose this immigration and reject these people, whose culture is based on the duty to hate the non-Muslim, and examples [of this] in their heritage are numerous and varied… The Arabs, and especially the extremist Muslims among them, are steeped to the bone in a culture of hostility and hatred.

“These conflicting sentiments – of hatred [for the West], but [a willingness] to risk one’s most precious possession, one’s life, in order to live among those hated societies and enjoy the comfort, security, stability and prosperity [they offer] – require a psycho-social investigation… Some people justify [this attitude], saying that [the Europeans] are racist xenophobes and are enemies of Islam and the Muslims. [But] for the sake of reason and honesty, put yourself in their place. Would any Arab country open its doors wide to Christian foreigners and [even] allow them to work in it? The answer is definitely not. So why do you demand that others treat [you] differently than you treat them?…

“All that is left to say is that the wave of populism currently sweeping the Western societies is justified, since it is [simply] a response in kind…”

[1] Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), July 8, 2018.

https://www.jns.org/saudi-journalis...del-west-why-are-they-so-eager-to-live-there/
The feeling is mutual. West hate muslims, yet love to suck our resources. Why? Because money matters.
 
.
The feeling is mutual. West hate muslims, yet love to suck our resources. Why? Because money matters.

Interesting point.

I don't think Muslims hate "infadel" west... Its moslty an exaggeration. However, those who do should go back to where they came from .
 
.
Interesting point.

I don't think Muslims hate "infadel" west... Its moslty an exaggeration. However, those who do should go back to where they came from .
Point applies to all parties.
 
.
The feeling is mutual. West hate muslims, yet love to suck our resources. Why? Because money matters.

When you talk about resources, you mean oil and natural gas, right?

The money gained from these resources do not go to many Muslims, only to a few 'leaders'.

This leaves the rest poor and wanting to emigrate to other countries.

Thus, the problem is not the 'sucking' of the resources, but the distribution of the income gained by selling these resources.

The hate should therefore be directed to the infidel Muslim 'leaders'.
 
.
Hi,

The west came to our motherlands some 4-500 years ago---they had no love of islam or the muslims---. And then they took over our nations---.

It is just a payback in a different manner over a period of centuries---.
 
.
Hi,

The west came to our motherlands some 4-500 years ago---they had no love of islam or the muslims---. And then they took over our nations---.

It is just a payback in a different manner over a period of centuries---.

But Muslims also came to the motherlands of non-Muslims hundreds of years ago.

They had no love for the non-Muslims living there and they took over their nations.

When I apply your reasoning, you should support what the Indian 'Hindu' Army is doing in Kashmir.

As you said: 'It is just a payback in a different manner over a period of centuries'.
 
.
But Muslims also came to the motherlands of non-Muslims hundreds of years ago.

They had no love for the non-Muslims living there and they took over their nations.

When I apply your reasoning, you should support what the Indian 'Hindu' Army is doing in Kashmir.

As you said: 'It is just a payback in a different manner over a period of centuries'.


Stupidity has no ending---.
 
.
The feeling is mutual. West hate muslims, yet love to suck our resources. Why? Because money matters.

Its not a question of "our". A question of "theirs". The Gulf countries which actually sell oil to the West are actually doing great with West technology and its people. The only country with major oil problems is Iraq, even there most of the oil contracts went to the Chinese and Russian companies. So this arguement is flawed.

So if someone destroys your country, will you try to migrate to that very country to live?

But Muslims also came to the motherlands of non-Muslims hundreds of years ago.

They had no love for the non-Muslims living there and they took over their nations.

When I apply your reasoning, you should support what the Indian 'Hindu' Army is doing in Kashmir.

As you said: 'It is just a payback in a different manner over a period of centuries'.

You do understand right that your arguement doesnt makes any sense?
 
. .
That's like asking why KSA buy planes from the west which do not recognize Palestine instead of buy planes from China and Russia which recognize Palestine.
 
.
You do understand right that your arguement doesnt makes any sense?

It does make sense.

He said that the West colonized Muslims and their countries and now it is time for payback.

In the same way, Muslims have colonized the countries of non-Muslims (for example Kashmir).

So if Muslims are entitled to 'payback' the West, why can non-Muslims not also 'payback' Muslims?
 
.
Its not a question of "our". A question of "theirs". The Gulf countries which actually sell oil to the West are actually doing great with West technology and its people. The only country with major oil problems is Iraq, even there most of the oil contracts went to the Chinese and Russian companies. So this arguement is flawed.

So if someone destroys your country, will you try to migrate to that very country to live?
Its a shame indeed, and I will not defend it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom