What's new

Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the "Clash within a Civilization"

.
Paul of Tarsus, after falling off a horse on the way to Damascus, says "and I went to meditate in Arabia"

I mean it's fun to study and see how everything is tangled up, and on the other hand it's funny that Christians and Zionists believe that the "land of Canaan" was an island off the coast of Norway

The reality is that Judaism spread like wildfire among women in Greco-Roman times

The reality is that the three so-called "Abrahamic religions" were three successive waves of response to the Roman Empire
 
.
(...)

Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων
Basileía Rhōmaíōn
Imperium Romanum



Islam emerges (ca. 570-632 ... 711) when the early Christians disappear

The Romans did not change religion, but literature, it is true that Christianity affected them for example in the valuation of the rich and wealth that lasted until the Middle Ages and then this was also reformed ...

But the Roman imperial religion did not change, but continued under another garb and another "mise-en-scène"

When the primitive Christians disappear, that is, when the Christians are no longer the opposition and dissidents of the Empire but the empire itself, then Islam arose

And yehudim of "the land of Canaan", tired of Roman-Christians converted to Islam

Something that was very simple for them, since their religious culture was neither the Sadducean priestly Judaism (-70) nor the Orthodox rabbinical Judaism that was born around the year 200 and that took a long time to be imposed

In fact, when some Russians and Poles of Italian descent (the Zionist) arrived in 1900-1917 to found "our colonial project", they were surprised by the presence of the Arab-Hebrew culture
 
.
Even if Arab countries feel the pressure from Iran, they should develop their own strength rather than close to Israel.

Only someone with low-iq will think the Arab countries are feeling pressure from Iran.. You have to understand scale and armements first it is simple thing and alliagance than you will get the clear picture.. Israel is the one under pressure from Iran because they lack manpower and very tiny land hack Iran could even rollover Israel without breaking a sweat but the Arabs could rollover Iran without much hassle.. As for the Arabs they are 10 times stronger due to having huge coalition and vastly outnumbering Iran it is technically a mismatch they are also way better armed.. They could feel pressure from only larger coalitions such as NATO
 
Last edited:
.
"almost all of the attacks and casualties are caused by Muslims attacking Muslims, and much of the violence is caused by Sunnis attacking Sunnis"

Let's see

"Our colonial project" happens to be in the Islamic quarter

So the goal is to create chaos in all countries that are disobedient, already subcontracting the work, already directly with the Foreign Legion of Zion, which until 1967 was called the U.S. Army

When the lackey Saddam began to think on his own, what happened ?

 
.
(...)

Wahhabi/Salafist Toxic

(A) It is a very useful tool to bring Chaos to countries of Islamic culture

(B) It can and has served to annoy Russia and China and create a zone of instability around their borders and within their borders

(C) Serves to spread Islamophobia

Win-win-win
 
.
Right now Persians are terrorists same as Arabs. So their great civilization was not that great if you ask me.
you ignorant uneducated fool...Your country is burning now so I hold my tongue..but next time you insult "Persians" I will unleash on you and your kind.:azn::azn:
 
.
"Other more hardline Iranians feel the United States and Europe will accept nothing less than a weakened and vulnerable Iran"

Language in the Western kindergarten is mind-boggling

A rational and realistic Persian is a "hardline iranian"

Imperial scriptwriters are completely insane when they tell Persians/iranians, Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese:

-Our populace firmly believes in the fantasies we imperial scriptwriters tell them

Why you don't believe us
 
. . . .
What civilization? first learn to respect reality and put blind racism aside then talk about it:
E0xdJo3WUAAquRI.jpg
 
.
Only someone with low-iq will think the Arab countries are feeling pressure from Iran.. You have to understand scale and armements first it is simple thing and alliagance than you will get the clear picture.. Israel is the one under pressure from Iran because they lack manpower and very tiny land hack Iran could even rollover Israel without breaking a sweat but the Arabs could rollover Iran without much hassle.. As for the Arabs they are 10 times stronger due to having huge coalition and vastly outnumbering Iran it is technically a mismatch they are also way better armed.. They could feel pressure from only larger coalitions such as NATO
"Only someone with low-iq " ?? Alright Mr High IQ. You are either on Saudi/UAE payroll, or you are dreaming. In total, Arab armies had been spending a minimum of 300 Billion dollars on American military hardware yearly, and they had difficulty fighting a handful of Houthis who actually defeated them. I rest my case.
 
.
"Only someone with low-iq " ?? Alright Mr High IQ. You are either on Saudi/UAE payroll, or you are dreaming. In total, Arab armies had been spending a minimum of 300 Billion dollars on American military hardware yearly, and they had difficulty fighting a handful of Houthis who actually defeated them. I rest my case.

You have been singing the same song thinking apples and oranges are comparable. It just goes to show you don't understand anything about conventional war...

Yemen is a civil war never forget this and Saudi are assisting one side that currently holds most of the land and that part can't be defeated militarily which are STC and Yemen Gov't everything is tied to tribes. How can they be defeated when the war is ongoing they hold most of the land from all ports, oil fields and most of the population centers. Hence this is a civil war it is low-intensity war but the coalition could technically kill all in Yemen by ransacking it if they decided to but don't want to butcher the civilians and also due to UN pressure it will be disaster if they wanted to appraoch with massacre they could end Yemen as civilization. There is scale to everything. these inside Yemen are capable of overcoming the Houthis on the long run specifically if it continues which it probably would
 
.
You have been singing the same song thinking apples and oranges are comparable. It just goes to show you don't understand anything about conventional war...

Yemen is a civil war never forget this and Saudi are assisting one side that currently holds most of the land and that part can't be defeated militarily which are STC and Yemen Gov't everything is tied to tribes. How can they be defeated when the war is ongoing they hold most of the land from all ports, oil fields and most of the population centers. Hence this is a civil war it is low-intensity war but the coalition could technically kill all in Yemen by ransacking it if they decided to but don't want to butcher the civilians and also due to UN pressure it will be disaster if they wanted to appraoch with massacre they could end Yemen as civilization. There is scale to everything. these inside Yemen are capable of overcoming the Houthis on the long run specifically if it continues which it probably would
You're describing details that are so basic and elementary. What I'm trying to convey to you is that Pakistan is an independent and sovereign nation whose political and military decisions are made in Islamabad, unlike the Arab monarchies who all took their orders from Washington and now Tel Aviv.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom