What's new

Saudi Arabia changes Ottoman ‘Empire’ to ‘occupation’ in school textbooks

Don’t get so ignited in trying to defend the indefensible policies of Arab dictatorial regimes.

Of course I don’t mean all Arab countries either, just the pro-Israel ones.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian protesters, and Qatar are vital exceptions.

Keep your takfir and ire of other Muslim countries to yourself.

Saddam should have ruled the entire Arab world. What we have no however is an entire region that is under the American hand, except Iran.
 
Saddam should have ruled the entire Arab world. What we have no however is an entire region that is under the American hand, except Iran.

Better to create a few Arab regional blocs that will work together. Just 1 or 2 of those are enough to utterly trash any hostile entity in the region as they are nothing compared to the combined economic and military power of such 1-2 Arab blocs, population, resource (natural and mineral) and potential wise. The superior of Arabs on those fronts will just increase and is increasing by every day, week, month and year. Having a massive population alone will ensure that. Look at China and India. If they had just 10% of their current population, they would be nowhere to be seen on any front.

I am 100% sure that KSA is working towards the bomb (if we don't already have it de facto) and like other past and present Arab countries, chemical weapons etc.

Anyway Saddam (Ali Hassan al-Majid) knew how to deal with the Majoos and Koords. Should just flood that shithole (Barzanistan) and completely Arabize it.

Stupid arab always need an ajm to save them when shit hits the fan.

Yes, Arabs whose ancestors founded the earliest and most influential civilizations of the ancient world, and who gave more scientists and scholars in the Islamic age than anybody else (as already documented by me earlier in this thread) are "dumb". As for Ajamis bailing Arabs out, I was never aware of Farsis bailing Arabs out, lol. Another Arabized individual.:lol:

Imagine this in KSA. Only you seculars can do this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_Pride


800px-Istanbul_Turkey_LGBT_pride_2012_%2886%29.jpg

A few Arabized and Turkified Anatolians on this forum, probably proudly attend such open street parades in Anatolia.:lol:
 
Not "Arabs"
Muslim Arabs ya dipstick
Certainly not secular/nationalist types like you.

Before that arabs were wild desert herding pagan tribesmen.

And after the decline had set in ARAB muslim world. Allah renewed islam through ajm from dynasties of mongols, turkmans, mamluks, ghaznavis, seljuks, berbers, zengids, ayyubids, osmanli(khilafa osmaniyya) etc etc.

The arabs you speak of were MEN of character and sound action. What are you?? Womanizers steeped in luxury. Numbed to the concept of ummah. You have traded iman for dajjalic system of materialism, despotic monarchies and oppression.
Better to create a few Arab regional blocs that will work together. Just 1 or 2 of those are enough to utterly trash any hostile entity in the region as they are nothing compared to the combined economic and military power of such 1-2 Arab blocs, population, resource (natural and mineral) and potential wise. The superior of Arabs on those fronts will just increase and is increasing by every day, week, month and year. Having a massive population alone will ensure that. Look at China and India. If they had just 10% of their current population, they would be nowhere to be seen on any front.

I am 100% sure that KSA is working towards the bomb (if we don't already have it de facto) and like other past and present Arab countries, chemical weapons etc.

Anyway Saddam (Ali Hassan al-Majid) knew how to deal with the Majoos and Koords. Should just flood that shithole (Barzanistan) and completely Arabize it.



Yes, Arabs whose ancestors founded the earliest and most influential civilizations of the ancient world, and who gave more scientists and scholars in the Islamic age than anybody else (as already documented by me earlier in this thread) are "dumb". As for Ajamis bailing Arabs out, I was never aware of Farsis bailing Arabs out, lol. Another Arabized individual.:lol:



A few Arabized and Turkified Anatolians on this forum, probably proudly attend such open street parades in Anatolia.:lol:
 
Not "Arabs"
Muslim Arabs ya dipstick
Certainly not secular/nationalist types like you.

Before that arabs were wild desert herding pagan tribesmen.

And after the decline had set in ARAB muslim world. Allah renewed islam through ajm from dynasties of mongols, turkmans, mamluks, ghaznavis, seljuks, berbers, zengids, ayyubids, osmanli(khilafa osmaniyya) etc etc.

The arabs you speak of were MEN of character and sound action. What are you?? Womanizers steeped in luxury. Numbed to the concept of ummah. You have traded iman for dajjalic system of materialism, despotic monarchies and oppression.

More nonsense from this clown. I repeat, the oldest civilizations on the planet are found in the Arab world, including the Arabian Peninsula. Arabia alone has more World UNESCO Heritage Sites than any other region in the MENA.

As for Pagans, indeed Arabs and our glorious Semitic ancestors followed the first recorded complex religions in the world (much better than other Pagan religions) but at the same time the first monotheistic religions emerged in our lands and there were as many Jewish, Christian and Hanif Arabs as ancient Semitic Pagans.


Not to mention that the first monotheists emerged in Hijaz. Later people went astray similar to how most Muslims have went astray nowadays. No need to mention some of the widespread practices in South Asia and elsewhere on this front.

Deserts are beautiful (mountainous, steppe, sand, green, volcanic, stone, all found in Arabia) and besides of that every type of landscape is found in Arabia and the Arab world from tropical regions to high mountains to desert, to tropical coastline to fertile areas and lowland. You must have an IQ of 20 to think "desert" is an insult for Arabs, lol.

Mongols?:lol: The same savages that destroyed Islamic civilization never for it to reach its old heights and who today are completely irrelevant and number 10 million people and who are Buddhists? Half of the rest, (all of them were weaker and less influential on every front compared to the height of Islamic civilization which every Islamic scholar will tell you and which I already covered in this thread) were Arabized and Arab in civilization.

More nonsense. Arab countries remain more Islamic to this day. Go take a look at the mirror, I suggest before blabbering nonsense. A few Youtube searches just about Karachi will shatter your nonsense.

I much prefer native old/ancient Arab dynasties ruling with Islam being the cornerstone, then what is seen in 90%+ of the rest of the Muslim world where military dictators, secularism and atheists are ruling supreme.

Go join the gay parades in Turkey and there you can scream about Arabs, lol.
 
Bro monotheists were always around. Even preceded by Hazrat Ibrahim alai salam. All the prophets that came before were monotheists. Monotheiism started from Hazrat Adam alai salam.
More nonsense from this clown. I repeat, the oldest civilizations on the planet are found in the Arab world, including the Arabian Peninsula. Arabia alone has more World UNESCO Heritage Sites than any other region in the MENA.

As for Pagans, indeed Arabs and our glorious Semitic ancestors followed the first recorded complex religions in the world (much better than other Pagan religions) but at the same time the first monotheistic religions emerged in our lands and there were as many Jewish, Christian and Hanif Arabs as ancient Semitic Pagans.


Not to mention that the first monotheists emerged in Hijaz. Later people went astray similar to how most Muslims have went astray nowadays. No need to mention some of the widespread practices in South Asia and elsewhere on this front.

Deserts are beautiful (mountainous, steppe, sand, green, volcanic, stone, all found in Arabia) and besides of that every type of landscape is found in Arabia and the Arab world from tropical regions to high mountains to desert, to tropical coastline to fertile areas and lowland. You must have an IQ of 20 to think "desert" is an insult for Arabs, lol.

Mongols?:lol: The same savages that destroyed Islamic civilization never for it to reach its old heights and who today are completely irrelevant and number 10 million people and who are Buddhists? Half of the rest, (all of them were weaker and less influential on every front compared to the height of Islamic civilization which every Islamic scholar will tell you and which I already covered in this thread) were Arabized and Arab in civilization.

More nonsense. Arab countries remain more Islamic to this day. Go take a look at the mirror, I suggest before blabbering nonsense. A few Youtube searches just about Karachi will shatter your nonsense.

I much prefer native old/ancient Arab dynasties ruling with Islam being the cornerstone, then what is seen in 90%+ of the rest of the Muslim world where military dictators, secularism and atheists are ruling supreme.

Go join the gay parades in Turkey and there you can scream about Arabs, lol.
 
Bro monotheists were always around. Even preceded by Hazrat Ibrahim alai salam. All the prophets that came before were monotheists. Monotheiism started from Hazrat Adam alai salam.

The first monotheistic society occurred in Hijaz at the hands of Prophet Ibrahim (AS) and Prophet Ishmael (AS).

Watch this video:


4 million views.

You talked about Pagans when there were more Christians, Jews and Hanifs in the Arab world than anywhere else percentage wise at the time of Prophet Muhammad (saws). Those are the only monotheistic religions recognized by Islam as being "people of the book".

The pagan Arabs (believed in ancient Semitic religions found in Arabia, Mespotamia, Shams, Egypt, Anatolia and elsewhere) were not any more or less Pagan than 99% of today's Muslims ancestors.

At the time of Prophet Muhammad (saws), Pakistan was almost 100% pagan. In fact Punjabis (largest ethnic group in Pakistan by far) are fairly recent Muslims. Before most of you were Hindus or Sikhs. So before insulting and blabbering about pagans, take a look at the mirror.
 
So we discard all information available in Quran and sunnah. And whatever this video says is true???
The first monotheistic society occurred in Hijaz at the hands of Prophet Ibrahim (AS) and Prophet Ishmael (AS).

Watch this video:


4 million views.

You talked about Pagans when there were more Christians, Jews and Hanifs in the Arab world than anywhere else percentage wise at the time of Prophet Muhammad (saws). Those are the only monotheistic religions recognized by Islam as being "people of the book".

The pagan Arabs (believed in ancient Semitic religions found in Arabia, Mespotamia, Shams, Egypt, Anatolia and elsewhere) were not any more or less Pagan than 99% of today's Muslims ancestors.

At the time of Prophet Muhammad (saws), Pakistan was almost 100% pagan.

When prophet Ismael alai salam was brought to hejaz in roughly same time. Hazrat Ishaq was also in Palestine both were monotheists???

Anything to justify Arab superiority??
 
So we discard all information available in Quran and sunnah. And whatever this video says is true???


When prophet Ismael alai salam was brought to hejaz in roughly same time. Hazrat Ishaq was also in Palestine both were monotheists???

Anything to justify Arab superiority??

Prophet Adam (as) was the first Prophet and first human and Hawwah was his wife. I talked about society.

Palestine is Arab/Semitic so your example makes no sense. Palestine and Hijaz neighbor each other as well but that is besides the point.

The fact of the matter is that the first monotheistic society in the world emerged in Hijaz. Later Semitic paganism gained a foothold.

You are projecting. Historical and religious facts = superiority in your eyes. In my eyes they are merely historical and religious ground realities.

I am using my phone but if you knew your Islamic history, you would know that the Kaaba is recognized as the first house in the world and it was built purely to worship our sole creator, Allah (swt) and nobody else. Later people started worshipping previous Gods and later ones that came from abroad of Makkah, as explained in the video.

Similar to how certain Muslims of today (not going to mention them as users and moderators will be crying) have went astray and take partners besides Allah (swt).

But rest assured the imaginary Wahhabis have changed 10's millions of such people and led them to the right path and more will follow in the future. Soon the Mutaween will be at your doorstep in the US and the US will become a land of Tawhid, Insha'Allah.

Rather than trolling against Arabs, as if that will change history or ground realities or your life, watch this video.

 
Last edited:
The arabs you speak of were MEN of character and sound action.

Hazoor Pak saws was the pinnacle of humanity and his Sahabah were the ideal followers, willing to risk all they have for the realization of his goal.

In front of all mankind, all leaders and even all prophets would be envious of such supporters.

The transition of mankind from darkness and ignorance into light and enlightenment happened in that age.

The lineage of prophets and Sahabah is not a blood lineage, but one based on faith and action. Quran is quite clear in that regard.

So look now how pitiful the failed ideologies of Arab supremacists, Arab secularists, Arab socialists, Arab nationalists, and pro-Arabist Muslim Brotherhood factions look in front of such great fore-bearers.

The former built Islamic civilization and expounded it in front of the whole world, while the latter have deconstructed the traditional identity and strength of Arabs, as primarily Muslims, selling the inheritance of their ancestors for pennies.

The fetid rot of apathy, inferiority complex, and stagnation has infected the whole of the Muslim world, but none more so than the Arab world, which is the diseased heart of the Muslim world.

The only way we will climb out of this abyss is to rediscover what made us successful in the beginning, which is a unity based of Islamic faith and enjoining proper action based off the Quran and Sunnah.

Until we realize that the least of this Ummah, the oppressed and abused Rohingya/Palestinian/Kashmiri, is equal to the most well off and powerful of this Ummah, Gulf/Turks/Pakistanis/etc., then we cannot claim to inherit the path of our progenitors.

Do we forget that this Ummah originated from a handful of slaves and poor suffering torture in Makkah?

To us that might seem miserable, but in their hearts was lit the spark which burns even now.

Look how arrogant we have become.
 
If Turks were Arabized (actually correct term is Persianized,) then we can’t ignore the fact that Arab were Turkified.

Egypt, Levant, North Africa, and Gulf are heavily influenced by Turkish culture. From clothes, headdressses, food, desserts, furniture, architecture, woodwork, pottery, and all other cultural identifiers are basically Turkish.

I bet most Arab nationalists of Levant here on this forum don’t even know that Yemenis and Omanis were influenced by Pakistani culture. Many of their women wear Pakistani clothes and men wear Pakistani shawls/shalwar kameez.

It’s not always a one way street.
It’s the other way around clown

Besides the Turks barely had culture or civilization that influenced the others

Stupid arab always need an ajm to save them when shit hits the fan.
You can’t save yourself how can you save the others??!!!
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom