What's new

Sanna Marin defeated by Finland's conservatives in tight race

Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
28,401
Reaction score
-82
Country
Canada
Location
Canada

Finnish conservative leader Petteri Orpo has won a nail-biting three-way election race, defeating Prime Minister Sanna Marin's centre left.
"We got the biggest mandate," said the leader of the National Coalition Party, after a dramatic night in which the result gradually swung away from Ms Marin's Social Democrats.
Mr Orpo secured 20.8% of the vote, ahead of the right-wing populist Finns Party and the centre left.
The populists won a record 20.1%.
It is a bitter defeat for Ms Marin, who increased her party's seats and secured 19.9% of the vote.
She continues to enjoy high poll ratings and has been widely praised for steering Finland towards imminent entry into Nato and navigating her country through the Covid-19 pandemic.

Shortly after the conservative leader claimed victory, the centre-left leader conceded the election.
"Congratulations to the winner of the elections, congratulations to the National Coalition Party, congratulations to the Finns Party. Democracy has spoken," she told supporters.
For weeks the three parties had been almost level in the polls, and as the results came in it became too close to call. Then a projection from public broadcaster YLE gave Petteri Orpo's National Coalition victory with the biggest number of seats in parliament.

"I think Finnish people want change. They want change and now I will start negotiations, open negotiations with all parties," he said.
There was a mood of euphoria in the camp, said Matti Koivisto, political correspondent with public broadcaster YLE. "When they saw the projection, it was quite clear they were going to win."
Finns Party leader Riikka Purra congratulated her centre-right rival and was herself delighted with the best result in her party's history.

"We're still challenging to be number one, but seven more seats is an excellent result."

Meanwhile, three of the other parties in the outgoing coalition - the Centre Party, Left Alliance and Greens - all rang up big losses.
Now 37, Sanna Marin became the world's youngest leader when she burst on to the political scene in 2019. She headed a coalition of five parties, all led by women.
Despite her successful response to neighbouring Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the election was largely fought on Finland's economy and public debt as all the mainstream parties backed Nato membership.
Many Finns see her as a polarising figure. She came under heavy scrutiny last year when a video emerged of her singing, dancing and drinking at a party. Supporters said the controversy was steeped in sexism and women across Finland and the world shared videos of themselves dancing in solidarity.
Petteri Orpo by contrast has none of Sanna Marin's "rock-star" qualities, says YLE's Matti Koivisto.

"He's a career politician. He's been in the game since the 1990s and he's quite stable and calm. There is criticism that maybe he's too dull and calm, but it also works quite well in Finland."
The conservatives will have the first opportunity in forming a government, and if they succeed, Mr Orpo, 53, will become the next prime minister.
Under an Orpo-led government, Europe could expect a pro-European conservative from the liberal centre of his party with an emphasis on economic policy.
Less exciting than Sanna Marin and very moderate, says Vesa Vares, professor of contemporary history at the University of Turku: "A sort of dream son-in-law."
Under Finland's system of proportional representation he will have to muster more than 100 seats in the 200-seat parliament to run the country, and that will not be straightforward.
Mr Orpo really has two choices ahead of him, either forming a right-wing coalition with Riikka Purra's nationalist Finns Party or reaching an agreement with Sanna Marin's Social Democrats.
"The Finns are a very difficult partner because they're so inexperienced and they have MPs who are discontented towards almost anything," says Prof Vares.
"The most natural thing would be to co-operate with the Social Democrats. But [Sanna Marin] used to belong to her party's left wing and it's obvious she doesn't like the conservatives."
Politics researcher Jenni Karimaki of the University of Helsinki also points out that Ms Marin has been reluctant to say what her aspirations are.
The Social Democrats have mixed feelings, she says, because while they increased their seats in parliament, they were unable to become the biggest party and renew their premiership.
"But Finnish political culture is known for its flexibility. They are known for their ability to negotiate and form compromises."
 
Finland is irrelevant. Only 5 million people. It's just a city in China.

@White and Green with M/S @mike2000 is back
That irreverent nation once pushed Soviet Union back and were called the white death. Check the casualties in that war.
It doesn't matter what you have but how you utilitse it.
The standard of living, societal structure, HDI, military complex, space missions (dunno if finladn has one) etc makes a nation.
By your flawed logic Pakistan is wholly irrelevant compared to India population wise (1.4 billion vs 200 million)
 
Trolling
That irreverent nation once pushed Soviet Union back and were called the white death. Check the casualties in that war.
It doesn't matter what you have but how you utilitse it.
The standard of living, societal structure, HDI, military complex, space missions (dunno if finladn has one) etc makes a nation.
By your flawed logic Pakistan is wholly irrelevant compared to India population wise (1.4 billion vs 200 million)

Finland has low standard of living and high cost of living. Finland birth rate is incredibly low. Finland is nobody compared to my homeland China = The Middle Kingdom.

China's neighbors are off limits. If Finland invades Russia then China gives Finland a bloody nose like how China gave the US a bloody nose when the US invaded North Korea in 1950.
 
Finland has low standard of living and high cost of living. Finland birth rate is incredibly low. Finland is nobody compared to my homeland China = The Middle Kingdom.
Finland has a low standard of living, eh? Finland is ranked 11th globally in HDI, China is 79
And for the sixth consecutive time, Finland topped the world happiness list.
Their average monthly salary is $2700+, so given that amount, the cost of living there might be affordable to them.
China's neighbors are off limits.
what does that even mean?
If Finland invades Russia then China gives Finland a bloody nose like how China gave the US a bloody nose when the US invaded North Korea in 1950.
Why would Finland invade Russia lol? Russia has imperialistic designs over Finland not Finland over Russia. Soviet Union once tried and was pushed back.
China won't do anything, US needs a reason for escalation which China has been avoiding so far, China has been secretly sending stuff to Russia but this stuff is mostly inconsequential as they can't send the high tech stuff or else US will intervene.
 
Finland has a low standard of living, eh? Finland is ranked 11th globally in HDI, China is 79
And for the sixth consecutive time, Finland topped the world happiness list.
Their average monthly salary is $2700+, so given that amount, the cost of living there might be affordable to them.

Western propaganda. Finland has miserable climate. Cold. No sun. China has subarctic in the north all the way to subtropical in the south.
 
Western propaganda. Finland has miserable climate. Cold. No sun. China has subarctic in the north all the way to subtropical in the south.
Oh wow so this is your best argument?
No sources no "believable statements" just western propaganda?
 
Invade China's neighbors and China gives them bloody nose. The US got a bloody nose when the US invaded North Korea in 1950.
India broke Pakistan into two halves though
All China did was sit there and threaten nukes, remember Pakistan was a friend to you back then too.
Soviets had pressurized you to do nothing. US told you to escalate as they viewed India as an enemy back then.

Invade China's neighbors and China gives them bloody nose. The US got a bloody nose when the US invaded North Korea in 1950.



Says who? You?
Says history
 
History is written by the victors, not by the vanquished.
So you're saying a highly controversial and well documented war didn't happen?
And your statement is flawed history gets ratification if various sources corroborate the same thing.

History is written by the victors, not by the vanquished. The only thing you can trust is power.




Pakistan was US ally back then. Back then India and China were socialist allies.
No we weren't "allies" or rather say friends of convenience after the 1962 war, Bangladesh liberation war took place in 1971.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom