What's new

Saharanpur baba waging a love jihad to 'save' Hindu girls in love with muslims

It's the best system on paper. But it's a system which places undue faith on the few at the expense of the many, and Men have time and again demonstrated that self-preservation trumps over altruism. I'd prefer the British Raj over it. :sick:

No not really....I'm more into a fusion of Democratic Socialism & Islam so it works for me....at least in my mind's eye !

I just never really agreed with the idea of the Vanguard Party - the Communist Party !

You are wrong.

To each his own then !
 
. . .
Sure but do not spread misinformation.

Oh come on drop that attitude - Its my Opinion formed after listening to Javed Ahmed Ghamidi - the rationalist thought in Islam in South Asia & my own reading of the Koran !
 
.
No not really....I'm more into a fusion of Democratic Socialism & Islam so it works for me....at least in my mind's eye !

I just never really agreed with the idea of the Vanguard Party - the Communist Party !



To each his own then !

You know what, if not for the rabidity of the movement, I find National Socialism to be a very good system too. A far more tempered and inclusive movement would be the best for India, IMO. But before someone jumps on me accusing me to be Nazi supporter, let me reiterate that I am talking only about their nation-building efforts in particular.
 
. .
Oh come on drop that attitude - Its my Opinion formed after listening to Javed Ahmed Ghamidi - the rationalist thought in Islam in South Asia & my own reading of the Koran !

Misinformation none the less. A Muslim can marry a Jew or Christian but they have to be real "believers" which in itself is hard to ascertain considering if a Christian or Jew was really a believer they would never marry a Muslim as it is against their religion lol. Despite that the leniency in this regard allows many such marriages to occur however this monotheist concept is some revisionist thing that no scholar would agree with which is why you will hardly see such marriages occur. If they do occur it is because they are disregarding Islam not because it allows it.
 
.
Of course ! :agree:

hE86B6EA0


:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
You know what, if not for the rabidity of the movement, I find National Socialism to be a very good system too. A far more tempered and inclusive movement would be the best for India, IMO. But before someone jumps on me accusing me to be Nazi supporter, let me reiterate that I am talking only about their nation-building efforts in particular.

I'd want a fusion of Libertarian Socialism, Nationalism & Islam being practiced in Pakistan - Maybe by the time I'm an 80 year old on my death bed it may come to pass ! :unsure:

Waisee I've always thought that the Germans have become so anti-Nationalistic anything because people just won't let the Nazi thing go & they keep on reminding the Germans about the Holocast, the Nazis & everything that every time they try to do imbue a sense of Nationalism in their people even if that sense has more to do with whatever predated the Nazis.....they're emotionally blackmailed into abandoning it with talk of the Nazis & what they did - Is this is a correct assessment in your opinion ?

Misinformation none the less. A Muslim can marry a Jew or Christian but they have to be real "believers" which in itself is hard to ascertain considering if a Christian or Jew was really a believer they would never marry a Muslim as it is against their religion lol. Despite that the leniency in this regard allows many such marriages to occur however this monotheist concept is some revisionist thing that no scholar would agree with which is why you will hardly see such marriages occur. If they do occur it is because they are disregarding Islam not because it allows it.

There are ample Muslim-Christian marriages though only very little Muslim-Jew marriages !

The criteria for 'real believers' is 'monotheism' not whether you're a Christian or a Jew - The Nazarens, the Jews & the Sabeans are explicitly mentioned because they were Monotheists !
 
.
There are ample Muslim-Christian marriages though only very little Muslim-Jew marriages !

The criteria for 'real believers' is 'monotheism' not whether you're a Christian or a Jew - The Nazarens, the Jews & the Sabeans are explicitly mentioned because they were Monotheists !

In regards to marriage the interpretation is literal, the verse states you can marry believing Christians and Jews meaning those who actually believe and are not just by name. Yeah then again Muslims cannot marry the same Nazaren and Sabeans.
 
.
In regards to marriage the interpretation is literal, the verse states you can marry believing Christians and Jews meaning those who actually believe and are not just by name. Yeah then again Muslims cannot marry the same Nazaren and Sabeans.

Where did I say that the interpretation was metaphorical ? I'm simply saying that the underlying principle isn't the name one calls one's self by but 'belief' i.e monotheism !
 
.
Where did I say that the interpretation was metaphorical ? I'm simply saying that the underlying principle isn't the name one calls one's self by but 'belief' i.e monotheism !

So by that logic you come to conclude Muslims can marry any monotheist? Then why did God specifically say Jews and Christians he would have just stated monotheists.
 
.
So by that logic you come to conclude Muslims can marry any monotheist? Then why did God specifically say Jews and Christians he would have just stated monotheists.

He didn't; the Koran says :"................And [lawful to you are], in wedlock, women from among those who believe [in this divine writ], and, in wedlock, women from among those who have been vouchsafed revelation before your time - provided that you give them their dowers, taking them in honest wedlock, not in fornication, nor as secret love-companions.............." (5:5)

Its about the Revelations & what do we believe that each & every one of them talked about ?

Monotheism !
 
.
Hans kya rahe ho? Saaf saaf kyun nahi bata dete ki tum convert ho chuke ho. <kidding>
:butcher:

:P

We will never accept a Bengali wannabe Kashmiri convert like @SarthakGanguly - Heaven's knows what could be wrong with him....what if he introduces some Fish based dish to the Wazwan ?
Hey we also have fish. :D Not as much as Bangladeshis though. And fish in Wazwan? - Blasphemy :P

I'm very much inspired by Communism myself !
:pissed:

Kidding :P I am not, but she... :confused: Can't go into details. Fundoos of all types will kill me. Na idhar ka rahunga, na udhar ka. :D


He didn't; the Koran says :"................And [lawful to you are], in wedlock, women from among those who believe [in this divine writ], and, in wedlock, women from among those who have been vouchsafed revelation before your time - provided that you give them their dowers, taking them in honest wedlock, not in fornication, nor as secret love-companions.............." (5:5)

Its about the Revelations & what do we believe that each & every one of them talked about ?

Monotheism !
Are bro - serious kyon ho rha h? :) Troll thread h, weekend pe mazey lo :omghaha:

Oh crap... weekend is over :(
 
.
He didn't; the Koran says :"................And [lawful to you are], in wedlock, women from among those who believe [in this divine writ], and, in wedlock, women from among those who have been vouchsafed revelation before your time - provided that you give them their dowers, taking them in honest wedlock, not in fornication, nor as secret love-companions.............." (5:5)

Its about the Revelations & what do we believe that each & every one of them talked about ?

Monotheism !

Where did you get that translation? In this verse it is referring to scripture meaning it is referring to the Ahle Kitab. Here are 6 transliterations all of which either say scripture or book.

Surat Al-Ma'idah [5:5] - The Noble Qur'an - القرآن الكريم

By your definition Muslims can even marry Sikhs because they are supposedly monotheistic but that is wrong because Sikhs are kaffir.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom