Cell_DbZ
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2017
- Messages
- 487
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
No, but they were planning to instal missle defence systems for a long while, those missle defences could definitely be converted to offensive weapons. Then NATO kept creeping closer to the Russian borders, while they have promised not to, how are the Russians supposed to interpret that?There were no U.S. forces near Russian border especially among eastern European country since 1991. Practically pulled all missiles out too.
When did Russia ever invade a country just because they 'disagreed'? You know very well it is never as black-white as that e.i. Russia is always the bad guy and America is always the saint. Georgia started the war and were acting like pigs to those (mostly Russian) people, was Russia supposed to just sit there? How weak would they have looked? An annexation is always illegal, I know that, however here there are justifications for the annexation. Crimeans never indentified themselves as Ukrainians (they belonged to Russia not long ago), even then there were no problems, until Poroshenko decided to accept a hostile policy against Russia (they had to leave Crimea and Ukraine was to join NATO and EU). Crimeans largely cheered the Russian arrival, western sources confirm this. Also, Russia would never give up to their Black Sea fleet (which country would be stupid enough to give up an entire fleet?)You going to invade every independent country because they disagree with you on policies?
Here's an example of Poroshenko's hostility:
This is the proposed emblem of the Ukrainian military intelligence
Does it remind you of something? (hint: Nazi Germany)
You know very well that would never happen, for obvious reasons.When are you going to invade Poland and other countries? Within the next few years?