What's new

Russian envoy: US invasion of Afghanistan was aimed at spying on Pakistan, China, Russia

Lets elaborate that game further, Americans were killed by Taliban and those Taliban are supported by Pakistan despite acknowledgement of that by the US, the US never took action against elements residing in Pakistan which are a direct threat to their soldiers lives. Now if it's really a game then it's played by both Americans and Pakistanis.
No matter how much rudimentary, Pak influence over Hakiki Pashtuns was like God sent. Thanks to Obama policies, Russians are slowly taking over. May God help the Trump administration...
 
.
Russia seems to be hedging its bets on Trump administration. Besides its not like the Americans haven't dealt with Taliban when it suits them.

Watch:

My point exactly. Russian tactics are the same as US, which pisses US off as they cant really claim moral high ground. US White house refused to call Taliban terrorists. (Cant post link as i am a new member, search White house Taliban not terrorists)
 
.
any man having rational thinking can point out,after Invasion of Afghanistan,USA lost its military foothold in Pakistan,which was working without any hindrance to keep eye on Russia,China as well as Pakistan itself for last 5+ decades.Why wage a war in Afghanistan to do the same thing?? :disagree::disagree: BS for consumption of gullible public.
 
.
any man having rational thinking can point out,after Invasion of Afghanistan,USA lost its military foothold in Pakistan,which was working without any hindrance to keep eye on Russia,China as well as Pakistan itself for last 5+ decades.Why wage a war in Afghanistan to do the same thing?? :disagree::disagree: BS for consumption of gullible public.


mzngrYF.gif


The Making of Indian Fairy Tales
  • Pakistan kept an 'eye' on China by deploying no military assets on Sino-Pak border. Classic Pak mind games. :D
  • Pakistan also kept an 'eye' on Russia with whom we share no border.
  • All this on behalf of America since CIA, NSA, et al. have been on holidays for last 5+ decades. :D
 
Last edited:
.
Invasion of Afghanistan had following key objectives

  1. Control and disarm Pakistani missile and nuclear program.
  2. Control Central Asian energy routes - hence the official backing of Washington for TAPI will sanctions on IPI...
  3. Keep a watchful eye on Mother Russia
  4. Preparation of future conflict with China..
Pakistani successfully responded by

  1. Keeping backdoor diplomacy with Afghan tribal and Taliban. Not letting collation achieve the target of stable foothold in Afghanistan. Improving nuclear security and global PR with regards to its nuclear capabilities...
  2. CPEC bring China, Russia and central asia into common economic block...hence limiting any excessive influence American can exert directly or by their proxy India..
  3. Signed defense co-op agreements with Russia..and enabled Russian investments in various projects..therefore enhancing Russian-Pak bilateral economic and security integration which is paramount to future strategic co-op.
  4. After CPEC, no further chance of Pakistan ever becoming a direct or indirect proxy in any American great game in Asia...
 
.
mzngrYF.gif


The Making of Indian Fairy Tales
  • Pakistan kept an 'eye' on China by deploying no military assets on Sino-Pak border. Classic Pak mind games. :D
  • Pakistan also kept an 'eye' on Russia with whom we share no border.
  • All this on behalf of Americans since CIA, NSA, et al. have been on holidays for last 5+ decades. :D

Its sad that now I've to teach you about your own country. :disagree::disagree:

From 1950s......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan–United_States_military_relations

These are known bases.Forget about Black Ops.

What they've used???

Till recently....

u-2-spy-plane-AB.jpeg


Before

300px-Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird.jpg


Along with.....

060913-F-9876J-111.JPG


Who will teach these guys that You don't have to put a guy in Russia to conduct recon,previously it was these assets,now there are sats as well.:disagree:
 
.
Is Kabulov Russian envoy to Afghanistan or Pakistan?
Many in Pakistan say that it was actually Pakistan which attacked and defeated Soviet Union in Afghanistan with the help of America.
 
. .
Yeah just for the sake of keeping an eye the US spent hundreds of billions of dollars and several thousands solider lives. Typical Russian mindset.
Not just spying but destabilization and containment. Yes US will spend billion of dollars and thousands of soldiers. After all it is in the interests of the Zionist Mission.
 
.
Yeah just for the sake of keeping an eye the US spent hundreds of billions of dollars and several thousands solider lives. Typical Russian mindset.

You gave us a mid night joke worth rolling on the floor...so you believe that Americans came here to take over the only medieval country in Asia where national sports are smoking weed and buz-kushi?....and take on some AK47 wielding Taliban....Well if that satisfies your mind and curiosity then I must say you would be a very happy man.


You can't think like that because you belong, no offence, to a poor and under-developed country but super-powers think in different ways. Why did Russia despite its economic woes entered so overtly in Syrian conflict and mobilised its best resources just to support one guy? lost its pilots and airplanes and even an ambassador?

Controlling the regions and locations of geostrategic importance has always been an obsession for all the superpowers whether it is the strait of Malacca, Persian Gulf, strait of Hormuz....and Russia-China-Pakistan alliance which has been featuring in the reports of many US think tanks for decades and this trio presents so much significance and risk that investing a few billions from the treasury of the world's largest economy is not a big deal...
 
Last edited:
.
And Mr. Zamir Kabulov must also under the fact that not matter if the world is bipolar or multi-polar, all of them will have enough stake in India, so much so that no pole can undermine India. :)
You statements contradicts itself. If no pole can undermine india, why one pole (zamir kabulov) have to understand it?
Russian decision to treat Taliban as "member of political process" directly undermines Indian position in Afghanistan.:wave:
 
.
You statements contradicts itself. If no pole can undermine india, why one pole (zamir kabulov) have to understand it?
Russian decision to treat Taliban as "member of political process" directly undermines Indian position in Afghanistan.:wave:

His statement has more to do with America than India. While everyone claim that the current Afghan government doesn't have writ outside Kabul and that Ashraf Ghani is the mayor of Kabul etc, where is the Taliban actually. Which group does the majority of the world reorganizes as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan at present ?? These are the things that really matter on ground.

Moreover, as long as a single U.S soldier is present is Afghanistan, Taliban won't have more than a nuisance value in Afghanistan with periodic suicide blasts or terror actions, mark my words. They will have to keep on depending on their traditional alleys for weapons and shelter, since they are not even a force without such generous assistance. LOL :p:
 
.
His statement has more to do with America than India. While everyone claim that the current Afghan government doesn't have writ outside Kabul and that Ashraf Ghani is the mayor of Kabul etc, where is the Taliban actually. Which group does the majority of the world reorganizes as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan at present ?? These are the things that really matter on ground.

Moreover, as long as a single U.S soldier is present is Afghanistan, Taliban won't have more than a nuisance value in Afghanistan with periodic suicide blasts or terror actions, mark my words. They will have to keep on depending on their traditional alleys for weapons and shelter, since they are not even a force without such generous assistance. LOL :p:
His statement has to with all allies of Kabul regime which itself admits it has lost control of about 40% of afghanistan. Where is the Taliban? Once it was linited to south now it is Everywhere in Afghanistan. . "Which group does the majority of the world reorganizes as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan at present ??" Why do you thj3ink we are discussing this? because countries are low recognizing IEA. That is the thing that will shape the ground situation in future. Forget single, IEA might have been nuisance when there were 100k US soldiers, now it raids cities & encircles them. They will have to keep poring water on dreams of their tradition enemies & their enemies new ally, IS Khorasan. LOL:cheesy:
 
.
His statement has to with all allies of Kabul regime which itself admits it has lost control of about 40% of afghanistan. Where is the Taliban? Once it was linited to south now it is Everywhere in Afghanistan. . "Which group does the majority of the world reorganizes as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan at present ??" Why do you thj3ink we are discussing this? because countries are low recognizing IEA. That is the thing that will shape the ground situation in future. Forget single, IEA might have been nuisance when there were 100k US soldiers, now it raids cities & encircles them. They will have to keep poring water on dreams of their tradition enemies & their enemies new ally, IS Khorasan. LOL:cheesy:

Then no more preconception, about a truce or one group winning this war. Lets wait and see who is the ultimate winner. :p:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom