What's new

Russian Engines to Fly to Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
SO intelligent of you, to compare my comment with that of religious xenophobic scumbags. I cant even see the connection, but then again I am sure you can.

Religious or not, you act no different at times from the others I have read your posts for the past year, you act or try to portray yourself as an "Intelligent" being, time to wake up from the slumber, and see your posts before your make useless posts like those below (which I was talking about).

I am sure you have raked your brain quite hard for that

I have seen you do more ranking than any "Think Tank" out their.

After you

Me? Do I look like the one who calls a different crowd an idiot and wants to fry them?

Doesnt it feel really pinchy, when you cant get anything done...A bullet reaching Pak Shores can harm India. Simple. We like Pakistani's to be quite similar to Hippies, "Make love not war"...
While we get on with our merry ways!! Comprende

Ah,. name calling and you try to take the moral higher ground like before "Hippies", Lol. Man you people still stuck in tights while the world moved on to baggy clothes.

Ouch!!! JF-17 being fourth gen, I am sure it is. But it was from a russian source talking in context of Russian view of JF-17, who along with most of the other world apart from the chest beating pakistani's and all weather copycat Chinese calls them JF-17 , 3rd Generation.

I wonder if it's the Russians who worked on it or the Chinese/Pakistani's who developed it, what is Russian input "Just the Engine", they should be the last people to judge what Gen a plane is, cause frankly their planes haven't had a good record in the past.

Lo, he could have been talking in Chinese Gen or a typo, but certainly AFM and ACM, etc, all rank it as 4th Gen.
 
.
Ouch!!! JF-17 being fourth gen, I am sure it is. But it was from a russian source talking in context of Russian view of JF-17, who along with most of the other world apart from the chest beating pakistani's and all weather copycat Chinese calls them JF-17 , 3rd Generation.

Why are you taking the Russian source so importantly when you yourself know that JF-17 is a fourth generation fighter. I can grab dozens of inaccurate sources from the media and prove something correct, a something wrong. Your just simply trying to start a flame bait to counter something which you cannot without facts. In that attempt, you so stupidly sideline the world with yourself and isolated Chinese and Pakistanis. Please dont post your nonsense here anymore or i will have to go on to the deleting mode. Talk constructively, sensibly. Adux is Adux, dont try to make it a donkey!
 
.
Indian BVRAAM is too lousy, inaccurate, third-class BVRAAM in the world.

While this could be true, I just wonder why you ppl throw all your brain and critique to trash when you look at your own junk up there?
 
.
Why are you taking the Russian source so importantly when you yourself know that JF-17 is a fourth generation fighter.!

How is that article not relevent, Why cuz it does not suit your view on things. Why is it difficult for you to understand that a person might consider J-10 Fourth Gen while JF-17 definitly a 3rd gen, as mentioned by the Russians.

Very piece of information we have suggest, JF-17 is far far from revolutionary.
 
.
While this could be true, I just wonder why you ppl throw all your brain and critique to trash when you look at your own junk up there?

Let's see apart from the "Engine" theirs noting else Russian about it.

Were currently looking for western BVR, etc, Lo, what to know another thing about useless Russian armament recently Russian AF fired in Georgia (2 missiles) which were later recovered and none exploded (explosive was intact), for God sakes they couldn't even scare them properly.
 
.
While this could be true, I just wonder why you ppl throw all your brain and critique to trash when you look at your own junk up there?

Why dont you take a step further and stand up outside the press box with a board saying stop flight testing a 20+ year old junk, still in development, inferior to JF-17, so called the precious first hand made Indian fighter jet? :disagree:
 
.
Let's see apart from the "Engine" theirs noting else Russian about it.

Were currently looking for western BVR, etc, Lo, what to know another thing about useless Russian armament recently Russian AF fired in Georgia (2 missiles) which were later recovered and none exploded (explosive was intact), for God sakes they couldn't even scare them properly.

You didnt return my hello PakSniper.

And you sound in shouting mode. :disagree:
 
.
Religious or not, you act no different at times from the others I have read your posts for the past year, you act or try to portray yourself as an "Intelligent" being, time to wake up from the slumber, and see your posts before your make useless posts like those below (which I was talking about).

And I have been reading your post and do know quite a bit of your history, you are no one to talk sir.


I have seen you do more ranking than any "Think Tank" out their.

Sir, Use the ignore button, Its a wonderful tool.


Me? Do I look like the one who calls a different crowd an idiot and wants to fry them?

I thought you had your group for a long time, why the jumping of ship.


Ah,. name calling and you try to take the moral higher ground like before "Hippies", Lol. Man you people still stuck in tights while the world moved on to baggy clothes.

"Baggy" Now thats a word I havent heard for quite some time now.


I wonder if it's the Russians who worked on it or the Chinese/Pakistani's who developed it, what is Russian input "Just the Engine", they should be the last people to judge what Gen a plane is, cause frankly their planes haven't had a good record in the past.

DOnt we just love it when Pakistani's and Chinese pass judgements on Russia about Aircraft manufacturing capabilities. All the while they buy from them , or even source their spare parts.
Please those guys have made and contributed far more to Aerospace to Pakistan and China combined twice wouldnt reach.
Look who just posted a complete idiotic post

Lo, he could have been talking in Chinese Gen or a typo, but certainly AFM and ACM, etc, all rank it as 4th Gen.

It was made during the 4th Gen period with definite 3rd Gen Charactersitics. Therefore as the Russian said, A 3rd Generation aircraft. Its like the bi-plane in world war-2..lol
 
.
How is that article not relevent, Why cuz it does not suit your view on things. Why is it difficult for you to understand that a person might consider J-10 Fourth Gen while JF-17 definitly a 3rd gen, as mentioned by the Russians.

Very piece of information we have suggest, JF-17 is far far from revolutionary.

See, wasn't I right about you!

God your practically useless to respond to (But, alas I will since I have day off from work).

Firstly, the ACM of PAF himself said it's a 4th Gen. Who's words are we going to take a reporter who didn't even quote or gave reference to the source, or for the top brass of PAF who's inducting the plane? What's funny is idiots judging the plane before we select electronics that will go into it from European nations, etc.

Far Far from revolutionary? Lol, (JF-17) that plane was doing circles when it left the factory way before LCA took off.
 
.
Why dont you take a step further and stand up outside the press box with a board saying stop flight testing a 20+ year old junk, still in development, inferior to JF-17, so called the precious first hand made Indian fighter jet? :disagree:

:rofl:

Thats an imaginative reply Webby.

And I noticed you didnt answer my question. :)
 
.
How is that article not relevent, Why cuz it does not suit your view on things. Why is it difficult for you to understand that a person might consider J-10 Fourth Gen while JF-17 definitly a 3rd gen, as mentioned by the Russians.

Very piece of information we have suggest, JF-17 is far far from revolutionary.

After posting 6000 posts you still need to learn about generations. Why am i not surprised.

Please research on your own: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4th_generation_jet_fighter

Because your still not meeting the requirements or you dont get tired of flame baits, or may be your showing your a simple troll.
 
.
Why dont you take a step further and stand up outside the press box with a board saying stop flight testing a 20+ year old junk, still in development, inferior to JF-17, so called the precious first hand made Indian fighter jet? :disagree:

Bro, this is the 2nd "Junk" they have made, first one is all shiny in the museum.
 
.
Let's see apart from the "Engine" theirs noting else Russian about it.

Were currently looking for western BVR, etc, Lo, what to know another thing about useless Russian armament recently Russian AF fired in Georgia (2 missiles) which were later recovered and none exploded (explosive was intact), for God sakes they couldn't even scare them properly.

Ah, Yes the Russian Junk theory!!! All the while you source Engine's from them. Hypocrisy galore, and to know that you havent changed even now , is very saddening.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom