What's new

Russia MiG-29 and America F-16. The most widely used multi role jets in the world.

don't compare Vietnam wars with Syrian war that shows that you're not neutral guy but always trying to degrade western tech and tell me what is the reliability of Russian/Soviet planes at the time of Vietnam wars, that a fair deal @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:

How should I know? Why you ask such bizarre questions? You say Russia jets have low reliability. Why don't you prove it rather than wasting other people's time on things only people having autism care about?
 
.
How should I know? Why you ask such bizarre questions? You say Russia jets have low reliability. Why don't you prove it rather than wasting other people's time on things only people having autism care about?
you wasting times of other peoples not me you troller @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: and why you compare 60/70 us military technology with current Russian technology that not fair deal @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:
 
.
you wasting times of other peoples not me you troller @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: and why you compare 60/70 us military technology with current Russian technology that not fair deal @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

You are the one who is going into every little detail like finding a needle in a haystack. You waste other people's time on things normal people don't care about. You have autism. I'm done wasting time on you.
 
.
You are the one who is going into every little detail like finding a needle in a haystack. You waste other people's time on things normal people don't care about. You have autism. I'm done wasting time on you.
so why you comparing Vietnam war with Syrian war saying first US lost thousand of jets than i corrected you that you it 800 figure and then suddenly you comparing old 60/70s US military tech with Latest Russian tech saying tha Russia military tech is better than US tech @undertakerwwefan Fair deal is this that you compare both (soviet/US) air force loses in Vietnam war @undertakerwwefan i think you're not included i n normal peoples but mentally disable people who can't understand simple logic and use the commonsense @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

You are the one who is going into every little detail like finding a needle in a haystack. You waste other people's time on things normal people don't care about. You have autism. I'm done wasting time on you.
Ten you should compare both (USA/Soviet) air losses in Vietnam war rather twisting/contradicting your narrative @undertakerwwefan
 
. . .
China had nuclear subs in the 1970s. As for jet fighter. Where's your jet engine?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_091_submarine
China had it in 70s and have today but its quality is semilarsto that of Russian subs of 70s. China had missiles much prior to India but India surpassed China in sophistication in technology. So far as engine is concern, chines engine's blades got bend while test running for 1 hour on full power while we operated kaveri for 53 hours continuously in testing. We operate kaveri at 1650 degree now. It is cleared for integration in plane. It will take some time but we will come up with 90, 110 and 125 kn engines and outclass China in this area too.
 
.
Hardly. Syria Su-22 flying well after more than 40 years in service. It's a myth from Hollywood. Americans love to diss Russia. Guess what? The first man in space wasn't an American was it? Yeah it was an ethnic Russian. Americans also copied solar panel from Russia. Soyuz was the first that uses solar panel.

I dont think its a myth. Syrian MiG-29 wont stand a dogfight even with older models of F-16s Israel has.
 
. . . .
Doubt it. Syria bought their MiG-29 in the 1980s and they are still flying. Think it has to do with servicing, not the plane itself.

But of course nobody should fly their planes past 40 years. It is too dangerous even if they are rated for it or not.

Plus, workers need to work. Let them build planes. Don't fly planes too long. Recycle. Recycle. Recycle.

Hi,

A 20 years old who has nop contribution to the thread---being doubtful does not mean sh-it---.

Before asking that question---you should have done the search yourself and would have found out the answers---.

Worthless thread with no contribution from thread starter---.
 
.
Hi,

A 20 years old who has nop contribution to the thread---being doubtful does not mean sh-it---.

Before asking that question---you should have done the search yourself and would have found out the answers---.

Worthless thread with no contribution from thread starter---.
Moderators need to take him offline. Needless rubbish being posted.
 
. .
Russia jets are used by 3rd world countries. America jets are used by 1st world countries. 1st world countries maintain their jets in better condition than 3rd world countries do. It has to do with servicing, not the planes themselves. Jets in Russia air force are as well serviced as jets in America air force and last just as long.

The raw materials in Chinese jets, Russia jets, EU jets, America jets are all the same. How long they last depend on how well they are serviced by their users.
Rimon20.png
thiskillsrussianshills.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom