Russia MiG-29 and America F-16. The most widely used multi role jets in the world.

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

and most western/US jets are also exported to lots third world countries like Pakistan saudi arabia , Indonesia, Malaysia singapore etc etc @undertakerwwefan

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Malaysia are not 3rd world countries. They are rich countries with professional military not like Africa

JF-17 doesn't use America engine. JF-17 use Russia engine. Tejas doesn't use Russia engine. Tejas use America engine. Pakistan maintains its jets in good condition. That's why JF-17 reliable and lasts long.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Malaysia are not 3rd world countries. They are rich countries with professional military not like Africa

JF-17 doesn't use America engine. JF-17 use Russia engine. Tejas doesn't use Russia engine. Tejas use America engine. Pakistan maintains its jets in good condition. That's why JF-17 reliable and lasts long.

Yes they are @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World
in the past most of the African/Latin American countries using lots of military tech from the west/USA @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Yes they are @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World
in the past most of the African/Latin American countries using lots of military tech from the west/USA @undertakerwwefan

So? America has top notch servicing and only 70% of America's F-16 are battle ready.

 

[Ultima Thule]

So? America has top notch servicing and only 70% of America's F-16 are battle ready.

And tell me the % of Su-27/Mig-29 battle ready jet of Russia, that even worst then west/USA @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

And tell me the % of Su-27/Mig-29 battle ready jet of Russia, that even worst then west/USA @undertakerwwefan

About the same if not more. Russia hardware simple, rugged, require less servicing. Go ask the Vietnam veterans which is easier to use? AK or M16. Yeah they tell ya AK.

 

[Ultima Thule]

About the same if not more. Russia hardware simple, rugged, require less servicing. Go ask the Vietnam veterans which is easier to use? AK or M16. Yeah they tell ya AK.

No ask your Indian Malaysian, Indonesian friends , that those military Russian jet jets are far far more require servicing then their western/US counterparts, they low fuselage life between overhauls, sames goes to Russian jet engines etc etc @undertakerwwefan

 

[HariPrasad]

Hardly. Syria Su-22 flying well after more than 40 years in service. It's a myth from Hollywood. Americans love to diss Russia. Guess what? The first man in space wasn't an American was it? Yeah it was an ethnic Russian. Americans also copied solar panel from Russia. Soyuz was the first that uses solar panel.

Don't tell me all this ok. We have mig 29 and we know the problems we are facing in maintaining them.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

No ask your Indian Malaysian, Indonesian friends , that those military Russian jet jets are far far more require servicing then their western/US counterparts, they low fuselage life between overhauls, sames goes to Russian jet engines etc etc @undertakerwwefan

Even Americans admit Russia jets are easier to service than America jets.

Don't tell me all this ok. We have mig 29 and we know the problems we are facing in maintaining them.

India is 3rd world country. Poor military.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Even Americans admit Russia jets are easier to service than America jets.

India is 3rd world country. Poor military.

just in your wasteful thoughts @undertakerwwefan
A-10 is more easily serviceable than this crap, Which easily shot down by Afghan war by stinger Mapads AA guns @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

just in your wasteful thoughts @undertakerwwefan
A-10 is more easily serviceable than this crap, Which easily shot down by Afghan war by stinger Mapads AA guns @undertakerwwefan

So were A-10 jets shot down over Iraq. No plane is invulnerable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...tates_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War

 

[Ultima Thule]

So were A-10 jets shot down over Iraq. No plane is invulnerable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...tates_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War

lot lower in number than Su-25, it more survivable than Su-25 which mostly down by AA guns whereas A-10 mostly down AAM @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

lot lower in number than Su-25, it more survivable than Su-25 which mostly down by AA guns whereas A-10 mostly down AAM @undertakerwwefan

Iraq didn't have new supply of SAMs. Once they used up what they got they retreated. Vietnam has constant fresh supply of SAMs and America lost thousands of jets in Vietnam and had to withdraw.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_losses_of_the_Vietnam_War

 

[Ultima Thule]

Iraq didn't have new supply of SAMs. Once they used up what they got they retreated. Vietnam has constant fresh supply of SAMs and America lost thousands of jets in Vietnam and had to withdraw.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_losses_of_the_Vietnam_War

only 800 jets if you read the articles perfectly @undertakerwwefan and more than half with crashes because of engine failures and other related technical crashes @undertakerwwefan read the articles first @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

only 800 jets if you read the articles perfectly @undertakerwwefan and more than half with crashes because of engine failures and other related technical crashes @undertakerwwefan read the articles first @undertakerwwefan

More than half are technical crashes means bad reliability of America planes. Russia planes only had 2 crashes in Syria over 3 years.

 

[Ultima Thule]

More than half are technical crashes means bad reliability of America planes. Russia planes only had 2 crashes in Syria over 3 years.

don't compare Vietnam wars with Syrian war that shows that you're not neutral guy but always trying to degrade western tech and tell me what is the reliability of Russian/Soviet planes at the time of Vietnam wars, that a fair deal @undertakerwwefan