READ MY POST AGAIN. I didn't say anything about what you are referring to in terms of market. I only pointed our own industry noted that prices that China is pushing is not feasible for them to even break even. The move is simply to get rid of our own business.
Why should we allow China to get rich off us while they promote insecurity in our region? We do agree on the same points, my issue was about the rail and road links. Unless we strengthen our country, I would highly advise it.
Arms dealing 101 as I referred to it, is playing both sides. I pointed it out numerous times, about France playing both sides. You can even look it up on this site going back yrs. Forget about Tibet, the time for making any moves on that is long gone. The only thing we can now is change our stand if we are pushed but thats requires a calculated thought out process.
Regardless of degrees, I am right on my points. Your reply did not counter anything. You did not provide or demonstrate how they can be dealt with (Maybe I missed it). That's the problem with Indians, everybody wants to be a f-ing chief. It seems you are upset, for what? I provided details but suddenly its not good enough. Why? I countered your points, stating China gave nukes. France and US money and weapons is nothing incomparions. Hell, the US also helped strengthen Pakistan control and command structure of Nukes so an accidental blast does not occur.
I pointed out the security issues with China's export for telecom and electrical equipment, yet you keep on yapping about trade and economics? So, you think it's okay to buy such products regardless of the security implication because it economically cheaper?
Have a nice day. The point is anything is possible given the right circumstances but China has not shown anything. So, that wishful thinking of roads and rails can remain a distant dream unless there was a change of goverance in Bejing.
