What's new

Russia don't need to build aircraft carrier. Yasen attack submarine is armed with Kalibr land attack

.
Because no one can afford it.
what stupid logic that is, some time irrelevant country was includes in war situation either force fully or for help, biggest example of that was WW2, this war fought between Germany and allied EU but allied EU was unable to stop German advances in EU, so that's why they called USA for help, its not a USA war and sometime geopolitical environment create certain environment that you include other war helplessly @undertakerwwefan
 
.
and they have different strategy than USN, to overwhelm saturated supersonic/subsonic anti ship cruise missles from air/ground (coastal areas), Ships and from submarines @nahtanbob

Russia has never fought a serious war far away from its shores. To that degree Russian navy is what it is
If they want to do the things USA does you need aircraft carriers

we will see what China does - whether they imitate USA or Russia
 
.
Russia has never fought a serious war far away from its shores. To that degree Russian navy is what it is
If they want to do the things USA does you need aircraft carriers

we will see what China does - whether they imitate USA or Russia
No the have Nuke subs to threaten your carrier battle groups in the case of any confrontation between Russia and USA @nahtanbob
 
.
No the have Nuke subs to threaten your carrier battle groups in the case of any confrontation between Russia and USA @nahtanbob

I am not saying nuclear subs are useless. they don't help with naval air power.
if you are fighting Argentina over falklands how does it help ?
or if you are helping vietnam to defend islands against china ?

Tu-142s and Il-38s are great at long range naval aviation. but if naval fighter gets within range it is toast. it is too slow and too big a target to defend
 
.
I am not saying nuclear subs are useless. they don't help with naval air power.
if you are fighting Argentina over falklands how does it help ?
or if you are helping vietnam to defend islands against china ?

Tu-142s and Il-38s are great at long range naval aviation. but if naval fighter gets within range it is toast. it is too slow and too big a target to defend
No sub is also do it with multiple shot LACM by different subs can do the job more effectively and cheaply @nahtanbob
 
. .
Istanbul was once Constantinople. What is your point?
that was 600 years ago. this is 73 years ago.

No sub is also do it with multiple shot LACM by different subs can do the job more effectively and cheaply @nahtanbob

No one has won a war firing long range missiles at the other party.
Hitler could not do it during ww 2. Iran-Iraq had a SCUD war. Saddam tried 35 SCUDs at Israel during the Gulf War.
For that matter US versus Osama Bin laden

if you want to put a nuclear warhead on your missile it is a different story
 
.
that was 600 years ago. this is 73 years ago.



No one has won a war firing long range missiles at the other party.
Hitler could not do it during ww 2. Iran-Iraq had a SCUD war. Saddam tried 35 SCUDs at Israel during the Gulf War.
For that matter US versus Osama Bin laden

if you want to put a nuclear warhead on your missile it is a different story

Missiles are missiles. Whether they are shot by planes or by subs makes no difference.
 
.
that was 600 years ago. this is 73 years ago.

Drawing a line which is convenient for you?

Have you ever thought about Alaska, Louisiana Territory, Arizona, New Mexico, California and Texas, Native American Lands?
 
.
Drawing a line which is convenient for you?

Have you ever thought about Alaska, Louisiana Territory, Arizona, New Mexico, California and Texas, Native American Lands?

Lines are convenient. I am sure you do not want to answer for the plunder and pillage of your ancestors
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom