Rush Doshi: Head of China policy at NSC

[nahtanbob]

What are you on about?
Sorry but you're not making sense.

The example was relating to transition, not how many rulers there were or not. There was military rule, military was deeply involved in Indonesian politics, and it stepped back once civilians showed maturity.
Please don't divert the issues, anyway this discussion is complete.

Indonesian military involvement happened only one family was involved - Suharto. Once Suharto left office they pulled back from politics. Even under Suharto they were involved because Suharto wanted them to be involved.

Every country is different. South Korea is the closest analogy to Pakistan with respect to military involvement in politics. The economic trajectories are different,

 

[peagle]

Indonesian military involvement happened only one family was involved - Suharto. Once Suharto left office they pulled back from politics. Even under Suharto they were involved because Suharto wanted them to be involved.

Every country is different. South Korea is the closest analogy to Pakistan with respect to military involvement in politics. The economic trajectories are different,

Due, what are you talking about? you've taken this discussion into fantasy land.
You keep changing the direction of the discussion, it has nothing to do with the original point and you are constantly wrong.
Please learn to have a concentrated discussion, not endless irrelevant points.

You don't know anything, please go read about Indonesian politics, civil military relations are still an issue, they went through a process where the military stepped back, your point is totally irrelevant, please don't pick things out of thin air.