RSS / BJP Anti Indian Independence, Anti Indian Flag, Anti Indian Constitution. Truth of BJP Hindutva.

[undercover JIX]

Excellent article. RSS/BJP has a very precise role in gangetic nation building theory. You have touched on this role quite well. It is no surprise that certain elements within the colonial establishment embellished and nourished this movement as the RSS/BJP/ hindutva philosophy remains in the long-term interests of colonialists.

RSS / BJP concept of Hindu Rashtra, inspired by The Great Manu.

Some pearls of wisdom and future of India. Reality and importance of caste system in India and how Future of India is shaping up under Modi and Yogi Govt. which wants to implement Manu Laws.

1. For the welfare of humanity the supreme creator Brahma, gave birth to the Brahmins from his mouth, the Kshatriyas from his shoulders, the Vaishyas from his thighs and Shudras from his feet. (Manu’s code I-31,)
2. God said the duty of a Shudra is to serve the upper varnas faithfully with devotion and without grumbling. (Manu 1-91) Manu is not satisfied with this. He wants this servile status of the Shudras to be expressed in the names and surnames of persons belonging to that community. Manu says:
3. Let the first part of a Brahman’s name denote something auspicious, a Kshatriya’s be connected with power, and a Vaishyas with wealth but a Shudra’s express something contemptible. (Manu II. 31.)
4. The second part of a Brahmin’s name shall be a word implying happiness, of a Kshatriya’s (a word) implying protection, of a Vaishya’s a term expressive of thriving and of a Shudra’s an expression denoting service. (Manu II. 32.)
5. A hundred year old Kshatriya must treat a ten year old Brahmin boy as his father. (Manu 11-135)
6. The Brahmin should never invite persons of other varnas for food. In case, the latter begs the Brahmin for food, the Brahmin may give them some left-over. Even these left-over must be served not by the Brahmin but by his servants outside the house. (Manu II2).
7. He who instructs Shudra pupils and he whose teacher is a Shudra shall become disqualified for being invited to a shradha. (Manu III. 156.)
8. A Shudra is unfit of receive education. The upper varnas should not impart education or give advice to a Shudra.It is not necessary that the Shudra should know the laws and codes and hence need not be taught. Violators will go to as amrita hell. (Manu IV-78 to 81)
9. “Let him not dwell in a country where the rulers are Shudras.” (Manu IV. 61)
10. He must never read the Vedas in the presence of the Shudras. (Manu IV. 99.)
11. Any country, where there are no Brahmins, of where they are not happy will get devastated and destroyed. (Manu VIII-20 to 22)
12. A Brahmana who is only a Brahman by decent i.e., one who has neither studied nor performed any other act required by the Vedas may, at the king’s pleasure, interpret the law to him i.e., act as the judge, but never a Shudra (however learned he may be). (Manu VIII. 20.)
13. The Kingdom of that monarch, who looks on while a Shudra settles the law, will sink low like a cow in the morass. (Manu VIII. 21.)
14. Any Brahmin, who enslaves or tries to enslave a Brahmin, is liable for a penalty of no less than 600 PANAS. A Brahmin can order a Shudra to serve him without any remuneration because the Shudra is created by Brahma to serve the Brahmins. Even if a Brahmin frees a Shudra from slavery the Shudra continues to be a slave as he is created for slavery. Nobody has the right to free him. (Manu VIII-50,56 and 59)
15. A Shudra who insults a twice born man with gross invectives shall have his tongue cut out; for he is of low origin. (Manu VIII. 270.)
16. If he mentions the names and castes of the (twice born) with contumely, an iron nail, ten fingers long, shall be thrust red hot into his mouth. (Manu VIII. 271.)
17. If a Shudra arrogantly presumes to preach religion to Brahmins, the king shall have poured burning oil in his mouth and ears. Manu VIII. 272.)
18. A Shudra who has an intercourse with a woman of the higher caste guarded or unguarded shall be punished n the following manner; if she was unguarded, he loses the offending part; if she was guarded then he should be put to death and his property confiscated.” (Manu VIII. 374.)
19. A Brahman may compel a Shudra, whether bought or unbought, to do servile work for he is created by the creator to be the slave of a Brahmana. (Manu VIII. 413.)
20. No Shudra should have property of his own, He should have nothing of his own. The existence of a wealthy Shudra is bad for the Brahmins. A Brahman may take possession of the goods of a Shudra. (ManuVIII-417 & X129)
21. A Brahman may seize without hesitation, if he be in distress for his subsistence, the goods of his Shudra. The Shudra can have only one occupation. This is one of the inexorable laws of Manu. says Manu. (Manu VIII. 417)
22. A Shudra who wants to just fill his stomach may serve a Vaishya. If he wants a permanent means of living he can serve a Kshatriya. But if he wants to go to heaven or wants higher or superior birth in the next generation he must serve a Brahmin. (ManuIX334 & 335)
23. The most sacred duty of a Shudra is to serve the Brahmins, always, reciting the words “Brahman” with utmost devotion. Such a Shudra will get salvation. Otherwise he will die a worst death and will go to the worst hell. (Manu X-121)
24. But let a (Shudra) serve Brahmans, either for the sake of heaven, or with a view to both (this life and the next) for he who is called the servant of a Brahman thereby gains all his ends. (Manu X. 122.)
25. The service of Brahmans alone is declared (to be) an excellent occupation for a Shudra for whatever else besides this he may perform will bear him no fruit. (Manu X. 123.)
26. They must allot to him out of their own family (property) a suitable maintenance, after considering his ability, his industry, and the number of those whom he is bound to support. (Manu X. 124.)
27. Brahmins to give Shudras food leftovers, old torn clothes, spoiled grain and old utensils (Manu X-125)
28. No superfluous collection of wealth must be made by a Shudra, even though he has power to make it, since a servile man, who has amassed riches, becomes proud, and, by his insolence or neglect, gives pain to Brahmins. (Manu X. 129.
29. A Brahmin shall never beg from a Shudra, property for (performing) a sacrifice i.e., for religious purposes. All marriages with the Shudra were prescribed. Marriage with a woman belonging to any of three other classes was forbidden.

This post is just related to Caste System, other will follow in time.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

RSS / BJP concept of Hindu Rashtra, inspired by The Great Manu.

Some pearls of wisdom and future of India. Reality and importance of caste system in India and how Future of India is shaping up under Modi and Yogi Govt. which wants to implement Manu Laws.

1. For the welfare of humanity the supreme creator Brahma, gave birth to the Brahmins from his mouth, the Kshatriyas from his shoulders, the Vaishyas from his thighs and Shudras from his feet. (Manu’s code I-31,)
2. God said the duty of a Shudra is to serve the upper varnas faithfully with devotion and without grumbling. (Manu 1-91) Manu is not satisfied with this. He wants this servile status of the Shudras to be expressed in the names and surnames of persons belonging to that community. Manu says:
3. Let the first part of a Brahman’s name denote something auspicious, a Kshatriya’s be connected with power, and a Vaishyas with wealth but a Shudra’s express something contemptible. (Manu II. 31.)
4. The second part of a Brahmin’s name shall be a word implying happiness, of a Kshatriya’s (a word) implying protection, of a Vaishya’s a term expressive of thriving and of a Shudra’s an expression denoting service. (Manu II. 32.)
5. A hundred year old Kshatriya must treat a ten year old Brahmin boy as his father. (Manu 11-135)
6. The Brahmin should never invite persons of other varnas for food. In case, the latter begs the Brahmin for food, the Brahmin may give them some left-over. Even these left-over must be served not by the Brahmin but by his servants outside the house. (Manu II2).
7. He who instructs Shudra pupils and he whose teacher is a Shudra shall become disqualified for being invited to a shradha. (Manu III. 156.)
8. A Shudra is unfit of receive education. The upper varnas should not impart education or give advice to a Shudra.It is not necessary that the Shudra should know the laws and codes and hence need not be taught. Violators will go to as amrita hell. (Manu IV-78 to 81)
9. “Let him not dwell in a country where the rulers are Shudras.” (Manu IV. 61)
10. He must never read the Vedas in the presence of the Shudras. (Manu IV. 99.)
11. Any country, where there are no Brahmins, of where they are not happy will get devastated and destroyed. (Manu VIII-20 to 22)
12. A Brahmana who is only a Brahman by decent i.e., one who has neither studied nor performed any other act required by the Vedas may, at the king’s pleasure, interpret the law to him i.e., act as the judge, but never a Shudra (however learned he may be). (Manu VIII. 20.)
13. The Kingdom of that monarch, who looks on while a Shudra settles the law, will sink low like a cow in the morass. (Manu VIII. 21.)
14. Any Brahmin, who enslaves or tries to enslave a Brahmin, is liable for a penalty of no less than 600 PANAS. A Brahmin can order a Shudra to serve him without any remuneration because the Shudra is created by Brahma to serve the Brahmins. Even if a Brahmin frees a Shudra from slavery the Shudra continues to be a slave as he is created for slavery. Nobody has the right to free him. (Manu VIII-50,56 and 59)
15. A Shudra who insults a twice born man with gross invectives shall have his tongue cut out; for he is of low origin. (Manu VIII. 270.)
16. If he mentions the names and castes of the (twice born) with contumely, an iron nail, ten fingers long, shall be thrust red hot into his mouth. (Manu VIII. 271.)
17. If a Shudra arrogantly presumes to preach religion to Brahmins, the king shall have poured burning oil in his mouth and ears. Manu VIII. 272.)
18. A Shudra who has an intercourse with a woman of the higher caste guarded or unguarded shall be punished n the following manner; if she was unguarded, he loses the offending part; if she was guarded then he should be put to death and his property confiscated.” (Manu VIII. 374.)
19. A Brahman may compel a Shudra, whether bought or unbought, to do servile work for he is created by the creator to be the slave of a Brahmana. (Manu VIII. 413.)
20. No Shudra should have property of his own, He should have nothing of his own. The existence of a wealthy Shudra is bad for the Brahmins. A Brahman may take possession of the goods of a Shudra. (ManuVIII-417 & X129)
21. A Brahman may seize without hesitation, if he be in distress for his subsistence, the goods of his Shudra. The Shudra can have only one occupation. This is one of the inexorable laws of Manu. says Manu. (Manu VIII. 417)
22. A Shudra who wants to just fill his stomach may serve a Vaishya. If he wants a permanent means of living he can serve a Kshatriya. But if he wants to go to heaven or wants higher or superior birth in the next generation he must serve a Brahmin. (ManuIX334 & 335)
23. The most sacred duty of a Shudra is to serve the Brahmins, always, reciting the words “Brahman” with utmost devotion. Such a Shudra will get salvation. Otherwise he will die a worst death and will go to the worst hell. (Manu X-121)
24. But let a (Shudra) serve Brahmans, either for the sake of heaven, or with a view to both (this life and the next) for he who is called the servant of a Brahman thereby gains all his ends. (Manu X. 122.)
25. The service of Brahmans alone is declared (to be) an excellent occupation for a Shudra for whatever else besides this he may perform will bear him no fruit. (Manu X. 123.)
26. They must allot to him out of their own family (property) a suitable maintenance, after considering his ability, his industry, and the number of those whom he is bound to support. (Manu X. 124.)
27. Brahmins to give Shudras food leftovers, old torn clothes, spoiled grain and old utensils (Manu X-125)
28. No superfluous collection of wealth must be made by a Shudra, even though he has power to make it, since a servile man, who has amassed riches, becomes proud, and, by his insolence or neglect, gives pain to Brahmins. (Manu X. 129.
29. A Brahmin shall never beg from a Shudra, property for (performing) a sacrifice i.e., for religious purposes. All marriages with the Shudra were prescribed. Marriage with a woman belonging to any of three other classes was forbidden.

This post is just related to Caste System, other will follow in time.

A difficult read. Please clarify: who or what is Manu?

 

[Sharma Ji]

who or what is Manu?

Adam, essentially.. I think.

 

[21st Century Vampire]

A difficult read. Please clarify: who or what is Manu?

King Manu is some legendary fellow believed to be the first human and he's one of the proposed (as per hindus ofc) possible authors of Manusmriti (the text he's citing)

Adam, essentially.. I think.

More like a mix of Adam and Noah from an Abrahamic lense, considering the flood in the Matsya

 

[jamahir]

he is only able to speak because we let the mad dog bark. All his lies are exposed, but Brahman slaves have no shame.

His way of interaction is with cruel and snarky words. That seems to be the default mode for Hindutvadis. No gentleness and sensibility in them.

I have reported him twice.

 

[undercover JIX]

His way of interaction is with cruel and snarky words. That seems to be the default mode for Hindutvadis. No gentleness and sensibility in them.

I have reported him twice.

That is way of liars who do not have any facts to back up their propaganda.

Reports are Ok but we must keep exposing their lies. their narrative is based on just made up stories without any facts. They need to be aggressive and cruel in order to stop others from asking questions and exposing truth.

Whole gang of RSS / BJP is following the same, as this is the only way they can control the weak and shut them from asking questions.

A difficult read. Please clarify: who or what is Manu?

to put it in simple words.....

Manu gave Hindus Laws, and his book of laws is known as Manusmriti, which is the bases od Hindutva ideology and aspiration to make India Hindu rashtra based on this Manusmriti.

 

[21st Century Vampire]

Illogical posts devoid of reality

What's so "unreal" about it? The Jewish golden age in Europe happened during Muslim rule halfwit and as a bonus guess where they ran to after the reconquista, i'm adding this coz that's the most obvious example to what @jamahir alluded to about Europe

 

[Nityam]

What's so "unreal" about it? The Jewish golden age in Europe happened during Muslim rule halfwit and as a bonus guess where they ran to after the reconquista, i'm adding this coz that's the most obvious example to what @jamahir alluded to about Europe

WOW. Now muslims take credit for Jewish golden age too

So why din't the Jewish golden age not take place in Islamic arabia dumbass

Why where they forced to end up in Europe and India ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1066_Granada_massacre will tell you about islamic tolerance for the jews.

Islamic caliphate chose "divide and rule" to create a distinction between Jews and xtians causing the xtians to resent the jews even more.

In any case since I am neither a Jew nor from arabia or europe, I don't care about their history. I care about the history of islam in India.

 

[21st Century Vampire]

WOW. Now muslims take credit for Jewish golden age too

So why din't the Jewish golden age not take place in Islamic arabia dumbass

Why where they forced to end up in Europe and India ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1066_Granada_massacre will tell you about islamic tolerance for the jews.

Islamic caliphate chose "divide and rule" to create a distinction between Jews and xtians causing the xtians to resent the jews even more.

In any case since I am neither a Jew nor from arabia or europe, I don't care about their history. I care about the history of islam in India.

Sigh that's why I believe IQ tests should be obligatory at the verification stage

Btw halfwit let me remind you that you posted a quote and the basis of my reply was related to that quote and @jamahir claim about Europe

Now muslims take credit for Jewish golden age too

Halfwit read again or you probably need a better brain, who's taking credit for their personal hardwork here? (Not me at least) They got their basic human rights (which was our obligation not a favour) especially freedom and the rest that happened was due to their hardwork and competence...The point was under whose rule did the golden age happen? Why the sudden peak in Jewish accomplishments didn't happen before that? Why did they flee to Muslims after the reconquista? It's a well known historical fact that Jews were economically and educationally suppressed and their attempts to revolt were constantly extinguished by force or sanctions before the arrival of Muslims

Do you still think it's "devoid of reality"? That was the main point I was responding to and now that you have started spouting I have to waste my time on more of your nonsense

Case in point do you agree that debunks your quote as well? (lol btw my neighbour is physically a copycat of Ambedkar)

So why din't the Jewish golden age not take place in Islamic arabia dumbass

In case this question isn't linked to the other next one then my response is the "golden age" obviously (at least for me) isn't a benchmark for peace and tolerance, the reason I mentioned it about Europe is to show a significant outcome of the peaceful relations that ensured for the most part during Muslim rule as well as a specific proof of peaceful Jewish Muslim interactions

Now coming to your quote and your point there were many jewish tribes (among them were those who were previously at war during the Quraysh campaigns against Muslims) living peacefully under the early Arab Rashidun caliphates and they were given privileges previously forbidden to them especially in Jerusalem, why did they do that if they had so much "contempt and enmity"?

Non Muslims weren't allowed in Hejaz that's it and for good logical reasons outside the scope of "enmity" and they were free outside of hijaz even under Rashidun rule and even prospered from time to time due to the ease in terms of the previous taxations they paid before the Rashidun and Ummayad era

Anyway back to the point, do you still think the post was "devoid of reality" and that your quote is factual? The more you run from the OG point I will keep asking

In any case since I am neither a Jew nor from arabia or europe, I don't care about their history. I care about the history of islam in India.

The low IQ aura you're emanating can be felt till here, idc about what a nobody like you thinks... I'm only responding to your claims, not to babysit and change your underdeveloped mind

To make it simple for you, you quoted a statement from Ambedkar about Muslims, @jamahir responded to it and you responded to him and I responded to you so it all boils down to that quote which was a generalized statement about Muslims...now do you want me to teach you the meaning of "generalization"? If affirmative then I'm ready to help anytime

It also concerns the fact that you made the point that @jamahir 's post about Europe was "devoid of reality"

What you specifically care about is of no importance here, what really matters are your claims

Why where they forced to end up in Europe

Halfwit most of European Jews especially spanish ones were there in large numbers even before Islam and as far as region is concerned it's a historical fact that jews were still living peacefully for the most part under Islamic rule during the Rashidun and even after for a long time in the middle east often having high ranking administrative positions

Islamic caliphate chose "divide and rule

Unproven assumption, their policies were in line which what the sharia prescribed there was no agenda on this nor there was any privileges which the jews enjoyed which the Christians didn't on the same spectrum and even if there was (the ottomans to some extent for e.g) it wasn't in line with the sharia and it was politically motivated and it wasn't related to some sinister plot about dividing Jews and Christians coz the jews were practically too powerless in terms of force to be some leverage against Christians nor did they hold much power to be kept on check to be ruled....that debunks your quote and your added claim once again

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1066_Granada_massacre will tell you about islamic tolerance for the jews.

The numbers are highly questionable

But anyway going with the flow so now i should take a short chain of historical events as authoritative proof to support your agenda...by this logic i'll judge all Hindus based on Gujurat and lynchings or I can bring examples of hindus doing nasty stuff from medieval and pre medieval times as well and I'll ignore all the good commendable works and deeds they did....uttam.....ati uttam

Try to stay true to your quote (which is a religious point about Islam ) this time by bringing religious proofs as well, compared to you I can prove my case both by combining history and fiqh

Btw now that I'm done dealing with your vomiting do you still think the post about Europe was devoid of reality?

In any case since I am neither a Jew nor from arabia or europe,

Very true, your level of intelligence is way lesser then theirs you're obviously not a jew I was already sure of it even before you informed me but thanks for the heads up nonetheless

Why where they forced to end up in Europe and India

And btw why the "why" and in which context you want be to expand on the "why"? You brought a quote heavily loaded with a theological implication and then you're bringing history to prove your point do you even realize the discrepancy here? Back up your claims with fiqh as well like I did

distinction between Jews and xtians causing the xtians to resent the jews even more.

Since when was there no distinction between them in Europe?

Btw there's no proof supporting this, nothing related to economy or status in this context or accusations of complot with Muslims, extreme persecutions and quasi genocides happened way before Muslims came, post Muslim rule the lense of the Christians who decreed proto-Alhambra policies were as good as those who initiated the Worms incident

 

[undercover JIX]

RSS Brainwashing Shakhas teaching children hate, and Modi is what he is today because of RSS....so we can imagine Modi / BJP and this Govts mindset.

 

[jamahir]

as those who initiated the Worms incident

What is that incident ?

 

[W.11]

Is Constitution ‘anti-Hindu’ or the RSS anti-Indian?

Is Constitution anti-Hindu' or the RSS anti-Indian?

www.deccanchronicle.com

they killed gandhi, so their founding father was also anti-indian/hindu

regards

 

[21st Century Vampire]

What is that incident ?

It was one of the many theologically motivated massacres the Jews faced in Europe, basically to summarize it for you back then due to the New Testament's portrayal of the Jews and the Pharisees from the beginning to the climax where Jews conspired to convince Pilate to crucify the Christ as well as due to the post climax early christian persecutions by the hands of the Jews documented in the Epistles of Paul and the book of Acts as well as the traditions of the church, there was this very anti semitic image moulded among European Christians about them even during pre Islamic times, sometimes they were killed simply because they were jews thus the "murderers" of Christ (yes they were still blamed for it), and sometimes they were killed based on false rumours inspired by their sly character in the New testament...plus worms was a chain of events not an incident sorry about that, I was distracted while typing yesterday

 

[undercover JIX]

RSS chief gave his blessings to terror attacks, and CBI knew about it, Aseemanand tells magazine

In an interview with The Caravan, Swami Aseemanand claims that the investigative body knew of a meeting he had had with Mohan Bhagwat, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's head, who sanctioned terror attacks.

vishal dutta photo
Feb 07, 2014 · 08:00 am

Mohan Bhagwat, chief of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), gave his blessings to a spate of terror attacks carried out in India between 2006 and 2008. What’s more, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had known about this when it arrested Swami Aseemanand, the prime accused in the Samjhauta Express blast case and two other cases, in 2010.

These are some of the claims that Aseemanand has made in a series of four long interviews he gave to The Caravan magazine from Ambala Central Jail between December 2011 and January 2014. The full article was published in the February issue of the magazine, and this week, The Caravan released the recorded audio clips from the interviews that highlight Aseemanand’s statements on the RSS’s role in the terror attacks.

You can listen to the audio clips here.

Aseemanand, who has worked for most of his life with the RSS’s tribal affairs wing, the Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, is currently under trial in three cases of bombings that killed 82 people – the Samjhauta Express blasts in February 2007, the Mecca Masjid blasts in Hyderabad in May 2007 and the Ajmer dargah blast in October 2007.

In The Caravan interview, he told reporter Leena Gita Reghunath that in 2005, he and his accomplice Sunil Joshi allegedly had a meeting with Mohan Bhagwat (who was the RSS’s general secretary at that time) and Indresh Kumar (member of the organisation’s national executive council) in the Dangs district of Gujarat.

In that meeting, Reghunath writes, “Joshi informed Bhagwat of a plan to bomb several Muslim targets around India. According to Aseemanand, both RSS leaders approved, and Bhagwat told him, “You can work on this with Sunil. We will not be involved, but if you are doing this, you can consider us to be with you.”

According to Aseemanand, Bhagwat and Kumar also told him “If you do it, then people won’t say that we did a crime for the sake of committing a crime. It will be connected to the ideology. This is very important for Hindus. Please do this. You have our blessings.”

While Kumar’s name has come up during the investigation of the blast cases, the National Investigation Agency has not yet interrogated him. This is the first time, however, that someone as high up in the RSS as Bhagwat has been named in connection with the attacks. If Aseemanand formally makes these claims in a court of law, it could have serious consequences for the RSS, which has faced bans on a number of occasions in its 90-year history.

The Caravan reporter attempted to get a response from Bhagwat about Aseemanand’s statements but did not hear from him. However, Aseemanand’s claim that the CBI knew of his meeting with Bhagwat and Kumar in 2005 makes the case even more curious.

In the interview, Aseemanand told Reghunath that when he was arrested, “the CBI already knew the whole story.” In the excerpts of the interview transcript released by The Caravan, Aseemanand said that “I was surprised how CBI got to know all these things. That only me, Sunil, Bhagwatji and Indresh had met in a camp at the Shabri Dham...it was very surprising to me that how CBI knew about this.”

The Caravan article does not mention whether the reporter attempted to contact the CBI for its response. However, if Aseemanand’s claims are true, then it raises one big question – why has the CBI not yet interrogated the RSS chief?

RSS chief gave his blessings to terror attacks, and CBI knew about it, Aseemanand tells magazine

In an interview with The Caravan, Swami Aseemanand claims that the investigative body knew of a meeting he had had with Mohan Bhagwat, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's head, who sanctioned terror attacks.

scroll.in

 

[Hindustani78]

Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Raigad - Formation Rashtriya Seva Sangh;

Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Raigad - Formation Rashtriya Seva Sangh work closely with Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Mysore; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Travancore; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Thoqra; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Khalsa; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Gaikwad; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Jodhpur & Jaipur; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Hyderabad; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e Shree Madurai; Sarkar e Hindustan - Sarkar e MahaRajamundry !!!

Hindustanis are watching and delivering the Justice by hunting down the Traitors of Hindu Rashtra !!!