Ok as far as the second post is concerned, I stand by what I claimed. I claimed that this is coming from BJP's very own 10 Janpath(Remote of BJP aka RSS). And I can post sources to to support my claim if you want to...
so then you are saying that govt. is going to do what this man is saying...not sure why you had to be reminded earlier...anyways yes plz i would like to see the sources....
Rs 2000 notes to be phased out in next few years: RSS ideologue S Gurumurthy
He added that high denomination notes would be done away within the next five years as the government was committed to moving towards smaller denomination notes.
0
SHARES
Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: December 12, 2016 7:35 pmHe added that high denomination notes would be done away within the next five years as the government was committed to moving towards smaller denomination notes.(File Photo)
According to RSS ideologue and renowned chartered accountant S Gurumurthy the new Rs 2,000 notes will be phased out over the next few years. In an exclusive interview to India Today, Gurumurthy said the Rs 2,000 note was introduced only as a bridge to meet the gap in cash being taken out of circulation.
He added that high denomination notes would be done away within the next five years as the government was committed to moving towards smaller denomination notes.
In a bid to weed out black money, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had on November announced scrapping of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes and introduction of new Rs 2000 and Rs 500 notes.
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...in-next-few-years-rss-ideologue-s-gurumurthy/
Where did I ever claim that Government is going to do what the man has claimed(Please read the article and my post properly before quoting), I merely pointed out that this man is making a claim as if he represents the Government(And the Government stays mum) which shouldn't be the case as he is not entitled to make any such statements.
I am neither confused nor confusing anyone. Looks like it is you who is misunderstanding things. I posted an article which stated that RSS ideologue has made a statement which states that 2000 Rs note WILL BE phased out. How does that become my claim, it is the news article which is making the claim? In my second post, I made a statement which implied that RSS is the 10 Janpath of BJP and I posted a source supporting my claim. So please read the posts again instead of misfiring...
So what are you trying tell over here, That a non elected body can question and review India's elected government. Government is answerable to people and not some org which claims to bring feedback from people(And this statement coming for you is something beyond my understanding). We have a place called Parliament where elected representative do bring up reviews/feedback from people. Did you even read the headline of news article you posted? Why did it even become news in the first place?
He can favour anything he likes but he is not supposed to make statements since he is not a Government representative(Atleast officially)...
I explained and even shared what a reasonable intelligent person will infer from your 10 Janpath remark....Its funny you had time to explain all that but not time to reply to my direct question...let me put it here again....will make it bold so you don't miss it this time
What i am saying is that anybody can review performance of India's elected govt. Organizations that favor govt. review it, organizations that are against review it, international banks review it, Rating agencies review it, Foreign govt. review it, various constitutional bodies review it, All political parties review it, Media review it and lastly common man does that too...All of the above are non elected bodies...and yes as long as that body is Indian they have the right to question it...what they don't have the right is to control the govt.....so now you have to prove to me that RSS controls the govt. and even your source is suggesting it is not....
It is beyond you because perhaps you are not paying attention....Parties do it all the time...they gather feedback from ground and share it with their Govt. There is no one forum for feedback...Didn't I say RSS helped BJP win 2014 and have been doing so since ages...were you not paying attention to that part?
It became news because even though there is nothing concrete to show yet there is narrative being blabbers that RSS runs the govt. So anything related to that becomes news...
So Modi attending a meeting of RSS where they review govt.(which is a BAU actually) and thus implying that RSS control govt. is a news for you...however the opposite version which says that he is doing stuff that RSS is against is not news for you...May i ask why??
thank you...actually became a father so obviously dead busy...and newbies here unfortunately are doing their best to ruin the forum we all love..anyways good to hear from you...
OK in simple terms... Government may/may not go by his personal comment but the probability of Government following his statement is considerably high.
You say anybody can review the India's elected government, fair enough. But I haven't seen the elected individuals from BJP going to every orgs/places(you mentioned) to get their reviews. Did you? There is a place called Parliament where questions are legitimately raised which I guess you forgot.
I claimed that RSS is the 10 Janpath of BJP, so if you are trying to say that Sonia Gandhi controlled Indian government during UPA rule, then the onus lies on you to prove the same i.e. that Sonia Gandhi controlled Indian government during 2004-2014.
No it is because I believed that you have good analytical and reasoning skills...
So tell me, Is BJP and RSS one and the same?
That is what you want to believe, if a re-owned News room decides to put that article out, the narrative does hold water.
As stated earlier, Had PM of India going against RSS being something quite normal then it wouldn't have been a news in the first place. So I am not questioning the news article, I am just stating the reason behind the news headline or article content.
