What's new

Rohingyas stripped off all nationality docs

What about Brahmana-Kshatriya. eg: Sena dynasty
Sena dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Were they anti Buddhist? Or did they fight the Palas? I don't know much. Also Hindu kingdoms also often fought each other. Does not mean they were anti Hindu. :D @Tshering22
How many Brahmin dynasties ruled India?

What everyone knows is the consistent destruction of Buddhist and Hindu culture from Gandhara to kamboj to Sindh to Kashmir to Pataliputra to Nalanda by Islamic invasions. The most famous University of those times and a place of Buddhist learning became history in the hands of Islamic invaders. Takshila was destroyed by Huns before that. Shankaracharya on the other hand could revive Hinduism from the deep South, yet untouched by Islam. Buddhism also flourished where Islam did not reach. Like in Lanka, SE Asia, China, Japan etc. The last relic was lost when the Taliban blew up the Bamiyan Buddhas.
 
.
Were they anti Buddhist? Or did they fight the Palas? I don't know much. Also Hindu kingdoms also often fought each other. Does not mean they were anti Hindu. :D @Tshering22
How many Brahmin dynasties ruled India?

What everyone knows is the consistent destruction of Buddhist and Hindu culture from Gandhara to kamboj to Sindh to Kashmir to Pataliputra to Nalanda by Islamic invasions. The most famous University of those times and a place of Buddhist learning became history in the hands of Islamic invaders. Takshila was destroyed by Huns before that. Shankaracharya on the other hand could revive Hinduism from the deep South, yet untouched by Islam. Buddhism also flourished where Islam did not reach. Like in Lanka, SE Asia, China, Japan etc. The last relic was lost when the Taliban blew up the Bamiyan Buddhas.
Islam destroyed Buddhism yet Hindus survived!!! It does not adds up.

The real history is Buddhist wanted a exit route from the clutch of Hindu revival. Islam gave them the opportunity to move back to ruling class one more time for the next 800 years yet in another identity.
 
.
Islam destroyed Buddhism yet Hindus survived!!! It does not adds up.

The real history is Buddhist wanted a exit route from the clutch of Hindu revival. Islam gave them the opportunity to move back to ruling class one more time for the next 800 years yet in another identity.
Hindus survived? Where are the Hindus in Afghanistan or most areas of Pakistan? They barely survived in India because of powerful local kingdoms and difficult terrain.
 
.
Hindus survived? Where are the Hindus in Afghanistan or most areas of Pakistan? They barely survived in India because of powerful local kingdoms and difficult terrain.

What happened to Buddhist of India? Where did they go?
 
. . .
So my point is why relentless Islamic invasion destroyed the powerful Buddhist not the minnow hindus?? :)
Because the Hindus had a refuge in the south. The Buddhists did not. Takshila was burnt by the huns and Nalanda by the Muslims. Plus, Buddhism in India was far too passive and hence a lot less capable of resisting. You can also check the declining Buddhist population of Bangladesh for a hint.

They were powerful in education and spirituality. Not in military arts in the 8th century. The Hindus were a lot more aggressive in comparison. Now it has be one the reverse. The wheel of Dharma, we say. :)
 
.
Because the Hindus had a refuge in the south. The Buddhists did not. Takshila was burnt by the huns and Nalanda by the Muslims. Plus, Buddhism in India was far too passive and hence a lot less capable of resisting. You can also check the declining Buddhist population of Bangladesh for a hint.

They were powerful in education and spirituality. Not in military arts in the 8th century. The Hindus were a lot more aggressive in comparison. Now it has be one the reverse. The wheel of Dharma, we say. :)

muslims always have been a bloodthirsty ,crazy bunch. Want to domesticate them ,be very hard on them for even minor infractions.
 
. .
I thought you'd support Myanmar (they're your allies remember?) rather than a bunch of radical, intolerant foreigners sitting on their land.
Do China interfere in Israel Palestine issue?

Same as here.
 
.
muslims always have been a bloodthirsty ,crazy bunch. Want to domesticate them ,be very hard on them for even minor infractions.

As harsh as your answer sounds, there is a strong hint of truth in it. Looking at Chechnya, J&K, Rakhine, west Bank\Gaza, Mindao etc we can understand what kind of steps are needed to deal with a certain variety of them.
 
.
Because the Hindus had a refuge in the south. The Buddhists did not. Takshila was burnt by the huns and Nalanda by the Muslims. Plus, Buddhism in India was far too passive and hence a lot less capable of resisting. You can also check the declining Buddhist population of Bangladesh for a hint.

They were powerful in education and spirituality. Not in military arts in the 8t h century. The Hindus were a lot more aggressive in comparison. Now it has be one the reverse. The wheel of Dharma, we say. :)

How did all the RSS hindu fanatics in North survived and lived side by side in Delhi? How did Tipu Sultan and Nizam ruled the Hindus while not throwing them in the Indian Ocean?
 
.
Rohinyas are Indian population. India should kick out chinki people from NE and resettle rohingyas there.

Mind your language, sonny.

Rohingyas are Bangladeshi muslims who have no place either in our country or Myanmar.

If you cannot control your breeding and become too big a population for your tiny country, the only answer is gassing chambers.

Your government should start gassing parts of your population to contain your land. Not encroach on others. Otherwise after sometime other countries will have to take population reduction measures like how Myanmar and our BSF take.
 
.
I thought you'd support Myanmar (they're your allies remember?) rather than a bunch of radical, intolerant foreigners sitting on their land.

Chinese are not like you wanna be Indians or Hindus??? LOL
 
.
How did all the RSS hindu fanatics in North survived and lived side by side in Delhi? How did Tipu Sultan and Nizam ruled the Hindus while not throwing them in the Indian Ocean?

Because those Arab and persian rulers were tiny in number compared to locals. There were bloody wars on a daily basis to revolt in some or the other parts of their so-called empires. No one can sustain long in an endless revolt in some or the other parts of the occupied zone.

You have much to read. Take the case of the battle of Saraighat.

BTW you know you're not an Arab/Turkic/Persian right?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom