Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
I wold rather think the Naxal movement is stagnating at best and weakening at worst.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mao had no forces, he had a million guerrillas, they had almost no weapons, where would he get them? What they did have they captured from Japanese, and Chinese army helping the Japanese, like Nazi's French foreign legion. He had like one or two factories, unable to keep even his 10,000 regulars at his wartime capital supplied.
Japanese refused to surrender to him, because Chang promised that the Chinese theater Japanese commanders immunity if they obeyed him. Those commanders later because high ranking advisers to Chang in Taiwan.
Mao succeeded because of his creative thinking, villages surrounds cities, use space exchange for time, don't dwell on a city and give it up if you need to, instead destroy the enemies' army. These are strategies inferior enemies use to this day. There's more.
Land reforms for everyone, democratic elections(I know ironic), loved based marriages and a whole bunch of ideas and reforms that made him popular.
One of the most important things, Mao created schools and he himself took part in massive farming initiatives, that made a crap land that grows nothing into a land that had a harvest each year. If you seen communists at work in the 50s and 60s, even during that time, there's camera footage from Americans, you would believe it.
I wold rather think the Naxal movement is stagnating at best and weakening at worst.
This is why I said the Indian insurgency looks more bandits than Maoists, because they don't have any revolutionary reforms or good strategies against the government.
The Naxalite movement is not rising but dying actually.
Kishenji's death signals the end of the present Naxalite movement | Business Standard
Mao had no forces, he had a million guerrillas, they had almost no weapons, where would he get them? What they did have they captured from Japanese, and Chinese army helping the Japanese, like Nazi's French foreign legion. He had like one or two factories, unable to keep even his 10,000 regulars at his wartime capital supplied.
poor guys fighting with indian state with those 1940s rifles and still giving them hard time
poor guys fighting with indian state with those 1940s rifles and still giving them hard time
nice so they have their own ordinance factory where they made all these stuffLOL..they're better armed than your paramilitary forces...do you know they even made this......
plus,its not Indian Govt really pushing for an "Armed Conflict against Naxalites"..they're eliminating them as well as corroding their base with development,the way one have to suppress these so called rebels.
dont worry about them they are only in north waziristan save ur *** from naxals first i just asked a simple question and u started trolling what an idiot u r.. because in the above video they were holding these world war 2 riflesIt's a declining movement. Same old alarmist media.
What about your 7th century cavemen Taliban who have turned your country into a failed state ?
Also tell that indian troll that 40% of their huge country is under naxalite control.Whereas we have insurgency in just small part of our tribal areas near afghanistan.dont worry about them they are only in north waziristan save ur *** from naxals first i just asked a simple question and u started trolling what an idiot u r.. because in the above video they were holding these world war 2 rifles
LOLs figures speaks themselves. We hardly lose 100 police/crpf every year fighting with Naxals but what about those 'little part' Taliban? You guys are losing your SSG troops, Major generals, majors, colonels and now to mention many hundred troops every year. We have saved our a$$ already be it from Naxals or Kashmiri terrorists but what about you?? We have controlled both of these movements and force them to surrender in large numbers(2500 naxals surrender last year alone) even yesterday 25 of naxals surrenderd and 7-8 killed. Last major naxal attack happened more than 7 months ago but what about your Pakistan my man? It happens every other day in Pakistan. So better save your a$$ from Taliban like we have saved ours from Naxal(Kashmiri terrorists are hardly any threat anymore so I am not counting them)Also tell that indian troll that 40% of their huge country is under naxalite control.Whereas we have insurgency in just small part of our tribal areas near afghanistan.
I don't know one way or the next, but during our communist struggle, Mao was actually pretty low level at the beginning, the Nationalist keep saying they killed this and that and communist is done.
Then long march happened, that was a retreat unlike any other in modern history. Read about it pretty interesting if you like, very hard time, but you know who's in command of China now don't you.
Of course looking at your naxalite movement, it's no Mao let communists. More like Bandits.
Only one word should suffice -Also tell that indian troll that 40% of their huge country is under naxalite control.Whereas we have insurgency in just small part of our tribal areas near afghanistan.