What's new

"Resistance 2.0." - Battle for Panjshir begins - Taliban claims victory

IEA has bulk of their forces in Kabul due to fear of the Americans like around 100k including army, police and tribal militias once they leave this will free up all the IEA forces to storm this valley..

This it would actully work in the opposite direction and free up all these in Afghanistan including these holding the security in Kabul to really mount a savage onslaught on Panjshir.. They don't have to bring the soutern forces in Herat, Kandahar and Lashgar-Kah, Ghanzi, Mazar-Sharif or Zabul..

Many more are coming in and could mount a very huge offensive 25k forces on each side X 4 and entering the valley from 4 directions as you putted on foot no hardware needs to be wasted.. I feel sorry for the Panjshiris this could create a very vicious blood-bath for them.. Every effin inch of Afghanistan will come under ''There is no god but Allah''
 
Last edited:
.
Ragtag Amrullah stands no chance. Holed up in a cave and no supplies nor weapons. Literally no support from US/NATO and Hindustan. The Taliban are undoubtedly in full control here. All it will take is a few hours.
 
Last edited:
. .
Ragtag Amrullah stands no chance. Holed up in a cave and no supplies nor weapons. Literally no support from US/NATO and Hindustan. The Taliban are undoubtedly in full control here. All it will take is a few hours.

It’s not done till either a deal is public and official (hence binding in Afghan eyes on the Honor of the person agreeing to it) or the province is taken. Anything less would leave an opening for foreign patronage to come in September. So either way, something has to happen by the weekend for there to be an acknowledgment by regional and international players that there is one government in Afghanistan, and to start dealing with them. Otherwise, opportunists will keep promoting the holdouts.

This is similar to the 1979 Iranian revolution. When the whole country fell under one government, and the royalist fled, the world reluctantly accept that the Ayatollahs were in charge.

Leaving a pocket open is like the Chinese civil war, where the ROC claimed to be the government of China (despite holding a small bit of territory) and held the UN seat for decades afterwards.
 
Last edited:
.
btw @49:38-49:58
Rep McCaul includes Pakistan in a list of enemies. So for those that think republicans see Pakistan more favorably then Democrats, well that doesn’t seem to be the case, or at least not around this aspect of this issue.

I've been saying it for a while on here. With Indian influence and add the fact that the US withdrew (and constantly told Pakistan for double standards), the tide will turn against Pakistan. There is no hiding there. Your adversary's lobbyists are in these people's heads 3 times a week.

This is where a strong foreign and diplomatic policy and a strong economy come in. Sadly that doesn't seem like the focus....
 
.
It’s not done till either a deal is public and official or the province is taken. Anything less would leave an opening for foreign patronage to come in September. So either way, something has to happen by the weekend for there to be an acknowledgment by regional and international players that there is one government in Afghanistan, and to start dealing with them. Otherwise, opportunists will keep promoting the holdouts.

This is similar to the 1979 Iranian revolution. When the whole country fell under one government, and the royalist fled, the world reluctantly accept that the Ayatollahs were in charge.

Leaving a pocket open is like the Chinese civil war, where the ROC claimed to be the government of China (despite holding a small bit of territory) and held the UN seat for decades afterwards.

Lol there won't be another Taiwan in a freaking small valley
I've been saying it for a while on here. With Indian influence and add the fact that the US withdrew (and constantly told Pakistan for double standards), the tide will turn against Pakistan. There is no hiding there. Your adversary's lobbyists are in these people's heads 3 times a week.

This is where a strong foreign and diplomatic policy and a strong economy come in. Sadly that doesn't seem like the focus....

This is unrealistic.. who are gonna shift the tide.. Star wars' storm troopers landing from the sky. Panjshir has zero assistance and will fall to IEA either by negotiations or storming either way it is gonna fall shortly this much is a certainity they are besieged and can't do much... Just a tiny dot on a map valley
 
Last edited:
. .
Lol there won't be another Taiwan in a freaking small valley


This is unrealistic.. who are gonna shift the tide.. Star wars' storm troopers landing from the sky. Panjshir has zero assistance and will fall to IEA either by negotiations or storming either way it is gonna fall shortly this much is a certainity they are besieged and can't do much... Just a tiny dot on a map valley




I think it will probably an army of terminators from the future.
 
.
Lol there won't be another Taiwan in a freaking small valley


This is unrealistic.. who are gonna shift the tide.. Star wars' storm troopers landing from the sky. Panjshir has zero assistance and will fall to IEA either by negotiations or storming either way it is gonna fall shortly this much is a certainity they are besieged and can't do much... Just a tiny dot on a map valley

Maybe not Taiwan then, but a West Berlin. Also, if the Talibs don’t want the tide turn against them, they have to get this issue with the Panjshiris resolved; leaving enough time to take it over if talks fail, all before September. Air drops are a realistic threat that should nit be underestimated, especially via Tajikistan, who’s president acts like he speaks for Tajik inside and outside his country, based on a tweet of a recent interview; on the FJ Twitter feed.
 
.
This is unrealistic.. who are gonna shift the tide.. Star wars' storm troopers landing from the sky. Panjshir has zero assistance and will fall to IEA either by negotiations or storming either way it is gonna fall shortly this much is a certainity they are besieged and can't do much... Just a tiny dot on a map valley

Thanks for your analysis. My post was in response to a totally different subject of US leader's thinking Pakistan is an enemy. I wasn't commenting on the situation in Panjshir....
 
.
So what's the latest, are the new NA putting on a good fight ? What kind of support do they have from Tajikistan, do they have air support ?
 
.
More and more IEA forces amassing in 4 directions of Panjshir. They were just coming wave after wave now continuing this deployment for nearly a week. Could have currently amassed 20k divided in 4 parts because they are in 4 different sectors.. Once the Airport becomes empty it frees up around 100k forces, police and militias that will likely also continue amassing of forces.. For me personally fuk the negotiations I want Panjshir to become a show of force for IEA and a military lesson..... laying down the pipe has more benefits in the long run.. This is a great moment to be seized

E9YoA-NWEActngN


E9mVnA7VUAQ2uiX


E9ZWOh3XoAojvls

 
Last edited:
.
I've been saying it for a while on here. With Indian influence and add the fact that the US withdrew (and constantly told Pakistan for double standards), the tide will turn against Pakistan. There is no hiding there. Your adversary's lobbyists are in these people's heads 3 times a week.

This is where a strong foreign and diplomatic policy and a strong economy come in. Sadly that doesn't seem like the focus....

Pakistan was facing a near existential threat from Afghanistan, pinchered between Indian and an Indian backed operation to destroy Pakistan every which way. In order for it to have a chance at a decent economy it needs security.

While some headway can be made, as with the diplomatic effort underway over the past few years, by and large, even more than Indian lobbyists, are interests that started diverging after the Cold War that never truly overlapped again since. The WoT only papered over the gap.

Beyond Afghanistan, Pakistani interests don’t conflict with US interests. Ultimately, had the US started inter-Afghan negotiations in 2001/2002, Pakistan would probably had been the greatest supporter, as the impetus was there, as was Pakistan’s efforts to reconcile the Mujahideen factions after the Soviet withdrawal, before there was a Taliban. As PM Khan said, the US messed things up, especially in allowing Indians to send forces against Pakistan from Afghan soil.
 
Last edited:
.
Taliban should also send ManPads to their troops on hills surrounding Panjshir to bring down supply helicopters coming from Tajikistan.
 
.
Taliban should also send ManPads to their troops on hills surrounding Panjshir to bring down supply helicopters coming from Tajikistan.

They have these since they seized plenty of stuff around the country.. I don't see anything significiant a helicopter could drop will change Panjshir's situation nor do I believe any helicopter will attempt to enter here
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom