What's new

Reports of Pakistani arms for Syrian rebels are baseless, says FO spokesperson

EyanKhan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
912
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistani officials said there is no truth in the reports that Saudi govt has shown interest in buying Pakistani arms for the Syrian rebels.

AFP, quoting its sources, had claimed on Sunday that if the deal is finalised, Saudi Arabia will buy antiaircraft guns and anti-tank rockets from Pakistan.

Talking to BBC Urdu on Monday, the Foreign Office Spokesperson Tasnim Aslam asserted that such reports at “baseless and have no sense”. She added, “The media concocts reports which have no reality.”

The AFP had said: Saudi Arabia is in talks with Pakistan to provide anti-aircraft and anti-tank rockets to Syrian rebels to try to tip the balance in the war to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad, a Saudi source said on Sunday.

The United States has long opposed arming the rebels with such weapons, fearing they might end up in the hands of extremists, but Syrian opposition figures say the failure of Geneva peace talks seems to have led Washington to soften its opposition.

Pakistan makes its own version of Chinese shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles, known as Anza, and anti-tank rockets — both of which Riyadh is trying to get for the rebels, said the source, who is close to Saudi decision-makers, requesting anonymity.

The source pointed to a visit to Riyadh earlier this month by Pakistan’s army chief of staff, General Raheel Sharif, who met Crown Prince Salman bin Abdul Aziz.

Prince Salman himself last week led a large delegation to Pakistan, shortly after Saudi’s chief diplomat Prince Saud al-Faisal visited the kingdom’s key ally.

Jordan will be providing facilities to store the weapons before they are delivered to rebels within Syria, the same source said.

AFP could not obtain confirmation from officials in Saudi, Pakistan or Jordan.

The head of the Syrian opposition, Ahmad Jarba, promised during a flying visit to northern Syria last week that “powerful arms will be arriving soon.”

“The United States could allow their allies provide the rebels with anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons following the failure of Geneva talks and the renewed tension with Russia,” said the head of the Gulf Research Centre, Abdel Aziz al-Sager.

Providing those weapons to the rebels “relieves pressure on the US in the short-term,” said Simon Henderson, director of the Gulf and Energy Policy Programme at the Washington Institue for Near East Policy.

“But the long-term political worry is that Manpads (Man-portable air-defence systems) will leak and be used to bring down a civilian airliner somewhere in the world.”

Rebels have long said that anti-aircraft rockets would help them defend themselves against Syrian warplanes, which regularly bomb rebel-held areas with barrels loaded with TNT and other ordinance.

The nearly-three-year conflict in Syria has torn the country apart, killing more than 140,000 people, including some 50,000 civilians, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

Rising Saudi influence

Saudi Arabia has a strong influence on Syria’s southern front, where it coordinates with Jordan, and has helped unite the rebel fighters in the area, according to Syrian opposition sources.

On the other hand, Qatar and Turkey are responsible for coordinating with the rebels on the northern front, said an official of the Syrian opposition, requesting anonymity.

Saudi Arabia has come to eclipse Qatar as the main supporter of the Syrian rebels, a development illustrated by the election last July of Ahmad Jarba, who has strong Saudi links, to lead the Syrian National Coalition, the main umbrella opposition group.

The trend appeared to continue with the dismissal last week of General Selim Idriss, the top commander of the Western-backed Free Syrian Army, who was considered close to Qatar, according to an opposition source.

The main criticism of Idriss was “bad distribution of weapons” and “errors in battle,” said another opposition source.

Idriss, who has refused his dismissal, has been replaced by Brigadier General Abdel Ilah al-Bashir, the leader of the rebel military council for the region of Quneitra in southern Syria.

On its internal front, Saudi Arabia has sidelined intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who had been leading Riyadh’s efforts concerning Syria, according to a Western diplomat.

Diplomats have said that the file has been passed to the interior minister, Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, known for his successful crackdown on Al-Qaeda following a wave of deadly attacks in the kingdom between 2003 and 2006.

Bandar’s management had triggered American criticism, diplomats said.

The Saudi royal himself has reproached Washington for its decision not to intervene militarily in Syria, and for preventing its allies from providing rebels with much-needed weapons, diplomats added.
 
AFP could not obtain confirmation from officials in Saudi, Pakistan or Jordan.


Record of the Press Briefing by Spokesperson on 20th February 2014

Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Islamabad, PakistanMinistry of Foreign Affairs - Islamabad, Pakistan

"Question

There are some media reports that Pakistan has taken a U-turn on the Syrian situation after the visit of Saudi Crown Prince. Is it true?

Answer
There is no change in our position in the sense that since the first Geneva Conference on Syria in June 2012
, Syria’s own position has also evolved. This process, which is under the UN auspices, was initially rejected by Syria but later on Syria become a part of that. There have been two rounds of discussions between the representatives of Syrian government and the opposition. They have been discussing a transitional government. Probably, the sticking point on which the second round broke down was whether President Bashar ul Asad will be in that setup or not. The UN has again appealed yesterday for the resumption of talks .We would like to see an end to violence in Syria. We do not subscribe to the theory of regime change in any country. Essentially, the people of Syria will talk to each other and work out what kind of setup they will have in future. The language in the Joint Statement between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is from Geneva-I Communiqué. This is something, which is accepted by Syria as well. So, there is no need for undue concern."
 
seriously , its better for pakistan to stay away , the region is enough in tension

it needs just an spark to blow up
 
Wait wait wait i thought Saudi wanted to buy JF17 and tanks :omghaha:

Seems, Its people like you, who spoiled the deal, or it was only propaganda, by people like you, to spoil Pak Saudi defence development.

At least it became clear, that Saudis are incapable to furbish self defence arms to Syrian vicitms of tyrant Asad.
Its about time, Saudia should start its own defence manufacturing.

seriously , its better for pakistan to stay away , the region is enough in tension

it needs just an spark to blow up

What do you mean 'stay away'?
On one hand you take pride in Hizb-ulla and Iraqi death brigades, and on the other hand you want others to not supply anti aircraft guns to vicitms of jet bombings?
 
What do you mean 'stay away'?
On one hand you take pride in Hizb-ulla and Iraqi death brigades, and on the other hand you want others to not supply anti aircraft guns to vicitms of jet bombings?

lebanon was/is (depending on what you believe) a part of syria, on the border villages their many villages that have relations with lebanese. Iraqi "death" brigades only became involved when the opposition showed their sectarian nature. Furthermore the wah*** deathcult would bring instability towards Iraq. what does pakistan gain from this, doubling the shipments of radical books to corrupt our youth, building of more taliban-minded madrassas or a couple million in kick backs to pakistani politians?
 
="BATMAN, post: 5313679, member: 2839"]Seems, Its people like you, who spoiled the deal, or it was only propaganda, by people like you, to spoil Pak Saudi defense development.


“No matter how big the lie; repeat it often enough and the masses will regard it as the truth.”
John F. Kennedy


At least it became clear, that Saudis are incapable to furbish self defense arms to Syrian victims of tyrant Asad.
Its about time, Saudia should start its own defence manufacturing.

“When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years.”
Mark Twain
 
Relations or not, Pakistan seriously needs to stay out of this and I really hope for once Nawaz Sharif takes a sensible decision in his life by not meddling in affairs that do not concern us to please so and so. If ,God forbid, Pakistan gets involved in this KSA vs Iran rivalry all hell will break loose and we won't be able to clean up the mess at home.
 
They will get whatever they want from Pakistan. you sit in the corner and cry for the great relations your country has with your sworn enemies.

Agreed, people can jump up and down all they want

The deal has already been done, the weapons are flowing, you may not find "offical" acceptance of this but thats whats happening
 
Agreed, people can jump up and down all they want

The deal has already been done, the weapons are flowing, you may not find "offical" acceptance of this but thats whats happening
Sure, there is no need for official comments, the important thing is what's on the ground.
 
Back
Top Bottom