Rejected by Modi but headed for Nobel Prize

[pothead]

Well, that went south pretty quickly for Desi Libtards.

Never in wildest dreams they would have expected the Noble prize winner to endorse Demonetization.
It was not just an egg of the face but like 100 eggs on the face with some of them being omelettes.

 

[ashok321]

 

[pothead]

Still the libtards are ignoring the fact that the current Nobel in economy endorsed Modi's economic policies over Rajan.

How does the 100 eggs on your face feel libtards?

 

[ashok321]

BJP IT cell’s attempt to use Nobel winner’s name to endorse demonetisation backfires

The Nobel truth: How using Richard Thaler's tweet on demonetisation

BJP IT cell's attempt to use Nobel winner's name to endorse ... - Alt News


Lol at desperate dudes and (Modi) boot licker Bhakts...

 

[Joe Shearer]

As long as the opposition uses Rajan as sword to attack Modi, it will be reciprocated.
This thread is created for one purpose - bash Modi.

Why are people surprised when it is being returned?

I have respect for Rajan, for what he did. Even Modi defended him when Swamy was attacking him.
I would in ideal times be in your place defending the guy. But when he is used to score points, I know exactly where my loyalties lie and what I need to do

I never knew that someone would finally come out and say what lies in the heart of every Sanghi: that his (or her) loyalty lies not with India, but with a religious segment and a political faction. So much for that phony nationalism; it is nothing but Islamophobia, a hatred of the Muslims of India, broadly misrepresented as a feeling of indignation against an aggressive and terrorist neighbour. So much for those pious platitudes about corruption and about integrity; it is, after all, that your politicians and social leaders are sons of bitches, but as they said about Netanyahu, they are YOUR sons of bitches. Now we need not wonder what new statistic will emerge from Alladin's cave; we know that inevitably it will be something that obscures the failures of your sainted leaders and magnifies their puny achievements to the level of the titanic. Even stooping to slander somebody that you yourself confess respect for, merely in order to make a political point, is not ruled out.

If a Sanghi had not said all this, if any other decent Indian citizen had said it, there would be an outcry. It is a blessing that these tactless and incriminating words came from you; it saves us the trouble of dealing with the outcry of the guilty caught in the criminal act.

You forget people.
I remember when my mum used to say that a certain govt employee amassed certain amount of wealth with bit of envy.
Corruption is not looked down. There is no social repercussion for being corrupt. If anything it's the opposite.

So much for the boost that the BJP sought, and partially got, from the campaign against corruption.

@Cookie Monster

One for your collection.

My family still farms. neither demo nor GST effected us one bit, either positively or negatively.
What affects farmers is lack of labour, lack of storage and the stupid mandis.

How fortunate that you had no accumulated cash, that you paid your labourers with cheques and through cash drawn through ATMs, that you discharged debts with rural service providers on PayTM....A sterling performance.

I refer you to a practice that led to people being called Stakhanovites (this is not part of the engineering curriculum).

You are biased when it comes to current disposition. That shows sir.

Biased? and against the 'current disposition' (how tastefully phrased)? Hmm, that is pretty serious. Let me draw up a wish-list that would satisfy a Pracharak.

1. The Pakistanis are taught that nothing and nobody existed after the IVC, after the fall of which everybody went back to their wattle huts and practised building minarets, until the Arabs invaded Sind. I understand that to survive in our Brave New World, we have to re-learn our history. Briefly described, this is what it is:
   1. Wise men in caves and forests composed the Vedas, and inspired the kshatriya to go out and conquer the whole world, spread the language of the Gods, Sanskrit, throughout the rest of the world. Unintelligent and misguided foreigners distorted this to form malformed dialects: Greek, Latin, Celtic, German and the rest.
   2. The Buddha, a kshatriya, was taught ancient wisdom, got enlightened, and spent years indoctrinating members of Indian society. If subversion laws had existed then, he would be Vinayak Sen-ed.
   3. After this unfortunate interruption of the ancient version of a libtard, India got back on the rails and continued to build world-spanning empires.
   4. There was some disturbance on the borders due to the mlechha Persians encroaching on the north-west and the south-west provinces. Their imperial rule was overthrown by some barbarians who ripped through their state, created more disturbances in the region of the Indus and then vanished as mysteriously as he had emerged. His troops refused to let him face the full power of the then Indian imperial army.
   5. Then the Maurya Empire emerged, and set in motion a succession of powerful empires that spanned more than a thousand years.
   6. Thereafter followed India's Dark Ages, which lasted for another thousand years.
   7. Next, India fought for and won independence from the British.
   8. The rest is MSM - MainStream Media.

Indian history in eight bullet points.

And what do u make of the thread title? That the person want's a meaningful discussion on the topic? Rhetoric can be used to make a point, I was not attacking you.

You mean anyone, anywhere, any time can publish a self-serving title on PDF, and wrap you up for a few hours? Goodie goodie gumdrops.


The rest of this post later.

Ok sir, I am sure you can quote Rajan voicing concerns about political interference & rise of NPA's.
Regarding MMS, your position is busted.
MMS has given speech in public the need to save Mallya. There are various notes which clearly show Banks being pressurized to extend loans.
not sure what else are u waiting for to call a spade a spade?


More diversion.
I am only bashing Rajan because YOU (I mean the opposition) is using him to bash Modi.



YES.
That's what happens to any private business that does not work. There are thousands of businesses that close down each year in India. has MMS provided the same relief to all?
This was crony capitalism at it's most blatant.
How you can not see that fact is baffling!



Not just banks. Railways needs to go the same way as well.
Govt should only be in business that involves our strategic assets, like defence, space and few other core areas.

All other sections needs to divest and let capitalism take it's course

 

[my2cents]

https://twitter.com/x/status/916870345025404929

Modi’s envy, world’s pride!

And this Raghuram Rajan was shown the door in favor of ex employee of Reliance aka Urjit Patel - a servile stooge.

Is this how India wants to progress?

Now Bhakts will come with their mishmash theories aka patchwork to support Jumla king Modi.

Lol

If Mr. Modi is successful in making India cashless, I would give him benefit of doubt for a failed attempt at tackling black money.

 

[ashok321]

If Mr. Modi is successful in making India cashless, I would give him benefit of doubt for a failed attempt at tackling black money.

India is numero uno corrupt nation in Asia (Forbes)
In the whole world, which economy is cashless, yet corrupt?

Basic chemistry 101:
Oil and water never mix.

 

[pothead]

I never knew that someone would finally come out and say what lies in the heart of every Sanghi: that his (or her) loyalty lies not with India, but with a religious segment and a political faction.

Sir, did I say that?
I only compared between some one using Rajan vs BJP.
You have twisted that to something else. Can't help you with that.

Anyway, I have never hidden the fact that I am a Hindu or a Sanghi. Not sure why it should surprise u that I would choose BJP/RSS over Rajan? Especially in cases where I have to choose one.

If your doubt is what I would choose between my nation, religion & Sangh, let me set the record straight.

Nation is always on top.
Relgion Next
Sangh Next

I choose Sangh because I feel they do better job for my nation than any other party. Religion is an added bonus.

Your eyes are a bit Jaundiced sir, that's why you saw my statement in the way you saw it.

So much for the boost that the BJP sought, and partially got, from the campaign against corruption.

@Cookie Monster

One for your collection.

I am not going to hide behind reality, no matter how distasteful it is. I am caste agnostic, yet, I recognize the utter destruction it caused and is still causing.
You can collect as much as you want but the reality of corruption is the fact that people are corrupt. We as a society never placed a premium on corrupt people. Hence the reason why they are emboldened.
Fortunately things are changing in the last decade or so....let's see what the future holds.

How fortunate that you had no accumulated cash, that you paid your labourers with cheques and through cash drawn through ATMs, that you discharged debts with rural service providers on PayTM....A sterling performance.

I refer you to a practice that led to people being called Stakhanovites (this is not part of the engineering curriculum).

We did have accumulated cash and we did deposit it in banks.
December is not a harvest season for rain dependent crops sir, hence the impact being none for us.

the labour was a huge issue before Demo, it remains a huge issue after Demo. Primary reason being MANREGA. You should go to small farmers and ask them how MANREGA destroyed them, along with lack of water of course.

Biased? and against the 'current disposition' (how tastefully phrased)? Hmm, that is pretty serious. Let me draw up a wish-list that would satisfy a Pracharak.

1. The Pakistanis are taught that nothing and nobody existed after the IVC, after the fall of which everybody went back to their wattle huts and practised building minarets, until the Arabs invaded Sind. I understand that to survive in our Brave New World, we have to re-learn our history. Briefly described, this is what it is:
   1. Wise men in caves and forests composed the Vedas, and inspired the kshatriya to go out and conquer the whole world, spread the language of the Gods, Sanskrit, throughout the rest of the world. Unintelligent and misguided foreigners distorted this to form malformed dialects: Greek, Latin, Celtic, German and the rest.
   2. The Buddha, a kshatriya, was taught ancient wisdom, got enlightened, and spent years indoctrinating members of Indian society. If subversion laws had existed then, he would be Vinayak Sen-ed.
   3. After this unfortunate interruption of the ancient version of a libtard, India got back on the rails and continued to build world-spanning empires.
   4. There was some disturbance on the borders due to the mlechha Persians encroaching on the north-west and the south-west provinces. Their imperial rule was overthrown by some barbarians who ripped through their state, created more disturbances in the region of the Indus and then vanished as mysteriously as he had emerged. His troops refused to let him face the full power of the then Indian imperial army.
   5. Then the Maurya Empire emerged, and set in motion a succession of powerful empires that spanned more than a thousand years.
   6. Thereafter followed India's Dark Ages, which lasted for another thousand years.
   7. Next, India fought for and won independence from the British.
   8. The rest is MSM - MainStream Media.

Indian history in eight bullet points.

Again, your prejudice is showing sir. I am neither blind to our history nor to our short comings.
You attribute a lot of things to us which are not real.
It's like me attributing some insane stuff to YOU because an insane self-proclaimed liberal sprouted some non-sense.

You mean anyone, anywhere, any time can publish a self-serving title on PDF, and wrap you up for a few hours? Goodie goodie gumdrops.

You are perhaps the only person on the 'other' side who has a meaningful discussion with me.
I appreciate that fact but that should also tell you that most of the time it's not that way.
The exception can not be judged on the norm.
Normal here is either trolling or borderline trolling.

Regarding wrapping me up, it did not start that way. It became that way only after you started engaging me
Let me just say I appreciate you debating me.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Still the libtards are ignoring the fact that the current Nobel in economy endorsed Modi's economic policies over Rajan.

How does the 100 eggs on your face feel libtards?

Somewhat like post #79. Nice try; as before, with incomplete knowledge.

 

[jaunty]

It is quite clear that unlike Rajan, Thaler didn't have any knowledge of the ground realities. On the face of it, demonetization did sound awesome. I mean what could be wrong with having more lower denomination notes and higher volume of digital transactions. Thaler didn't even know that they were replacing 1000 rupee notes with 2000, let alone the logistics problems and the fact that it would take almost 3 months to replace all the notes. But as usual, half-truths and misleading stats have become a forte of bhakts.

 

[pothead]

Somewhat like post #79. Nice try; as before, with incomplete knowledge.

Sir, you should by now know there are many posts I make which are never meant for you.

It is quite clear that unlike Rajan, Thaler didn't have any knowledge of the ground realities. On the face of it, demonetization did sound awesome. I mean what could be wrong with having more lower denomination notes and higher volume of digital transactions. Thaler didn't even know that they were replacing 1000 rupee notes with 2000, let alone the logistics problems and the fact that it would take almost 3 months to replace all the notes. But as usual, half-truths and misleading stats have become a forte of bhakts.

When the narrative changes, change the narrative.
Works pretty good, doesn't it.

As long as it was Rajan, you had a stick to hit BJP with.
Now some other person has won, he is stupid and is not aware of ground realities.

He is a freaking noble prize winning economist. I bet he has more understanding of the ground realities in his pinkie finger than you and me.

It's just that his opinion does not suit the agenda.

 

[jaunty]

When the narrative changes, change the narrative.
Works pretty good, doesn't it.

As long as it was Rajan, you had a stick to hit BJP with.
Now some other person has won, he is stupid and is not aware of ground realities.

He is a freaking noble prize winning economist. I bet he has more understanding of the ground realities in his pinkie finger than you and me.

It's just that his opinion does not suit the agenda.

Dumbass, I didn't call him stupid, but it's clear that he had no idea of what was actually happening. He was under the impression that 500/1000 notes would be replaced by lower denomination notes, not by the same or higher denominations.

 

[pothead]

Dumbass, I didn't call him stupid, but it's clear that he had no idea of what was actually happening. He was under the impression that 500/1000 notes would be replaced by lower denomination notes, not by the same or higher denominations.

So, you agree with him that Demo is good but 2000 rupee is bad?

If so, I agree with you. I was not happy with Modi bringing in 2000 rupee note. I am all for him banning 2000 rupee note at the earliest.
In fact take out 500 rupee as well. Keep 200 as highest denomination.

You are confused & in your confusion you are mixing two positions to prop up your failed logic.

So, answer the question first -
Is demo bad because Modi introduced 2000 rupee notes?
Or is it bad in general?

 

[jaunty]

So, you agree with him that Demo is good but 2000 rupee is bad?

If so, I agree with you. I was not happy with Modi bringing in 2000 rupee note. I am all for him banning 2000 rupee note at the earliest.
In fact take out 500 rupee as well. Keep 200 as highest denomination.

You are confused & in your confusion you are mixing two positions to prop up your failed logic.

So, answer the question first -
Is demo bad because Modi introduced 2000 rupee notes?
Or is it bad in general?

My original post on demonetization,

 

[pothead]

My original post on demonetization,

Very balanced post & true.
Any move as big as Demo and GST will have it's short comings.

For example, the most critical factor for Demo was the surprise factor. Any more preparation and anyone worth their salt would know what's coming round the corner. People complained about ATM's not being configured for 2000 rupee note. Duh, if you are configuring it, how will one keep it a secret. Same goes for many other arguments being made for a better planned Demo.
If you wanted an efficient Demo, what BJP did was close to the ideal form. Only one thing I would have done differently was to use the ink on people to make sure they did not bring in cash repeatedly, which happened in initial few days.

Would sincerely like to know what you think BJP could have been done better to make the process better.
The logistics of it was always a nightmare & hindsight always 20/20.

Still, if the tax base does not increase, I would think Demo was a failure. If it did and companies are exposed, it would mean it was a success.
Was there pain - Oh yeah, there was. Was it worth it? Let's wait for bit more before we demand Modi's head.

It would be completely other thing if one did not like Demo at all.