What's new

RAW Planted Stories in Indian Media

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
http://www.riazhaq.com/2016/10/planted-stories-in-indian-media.html

Last year, India's ex foreign secretary Sujata Singh bitterly complained about negative stories "planted in the media" by the Modi government to "tarnish" her reputation as part of the campaign to force her resignation. "The commentary that I have seen over the past two days has pained me deeply. I believe it was not necessary to get low and dirty," she said, according to India's First Post.


RAW Planted Stories:

Doing a Google search today on news about Pakistan shows the first page of the search results filled with negative stories that seem obviously planted by the Modi government in highly search-engine-optimized Indian media.

The planted stories present Indian Army's claimed "surgical strikes" in Pakistan as fact. They do not bother to put quotes around "surgical strikes" as international media have done. They do not ask any questions nor offer proof of such "surgical strikes".

Some of these planted stories claim "mass public protests" and "Pakistan flag burnings" in Azad Kashmir, Gilgit Baltistan and Balochistan without offering any evidence. Other such made-up stories are about civil-military tensions in Pakistan and the country's "international isolation".

Psychological Operations (PsyOps):

Who plants these stories? And how? Let us examine this in a little more detail.

Professor Shyam Tekwani of the Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies in Hawaii has studied how the Indian government plants stories as part of its psychological operations (PsyOps). Here's an excerpt from his book "Media and Conflict Reporting in Asia":

"With a huge deployment of army, paramilitary and police forces fighting a host of separatist rebel armies, psyops has become a regular feature of journalism in conflict-ridden zones like India's Kashmir and northeastern states. The army and the paramilitary forces, the intelligence agencies and even state police have their own budgets and dedicated psyops. While most organizations use their intelligence units and public relations officials to perform the task, the Indian army has a full-fledged psyops cell in the Directorate of Military Intelligence... Bigger intelligence agencies like the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) employ media directors, mostly drawn from the Indian Information Service......And what do they do? Plant and push stories that run down the enemy and their image, promote their own cause and image, cover their track on a secret killing or blame it falsely on others (routine for them to pass off a secret killing by their assets as "infighting among rebels") and create feel-good atmosphere about their own operations.....Psyops planners carefully take into account
capabilities of their own "media assets" and the reach of the media they work for and whether the "plant" would hit the target area and create the necessary impact. It is war through the media--whoever said pen is mightier than sword is vindicated--but at the cost of professional journalism."

RAW Money Flow:

India has opened up a big money money spigot to use its agents, including its media assets, to destabilize Pakistan. RK Yadav, an ex intelligence official of RAW, has in a TV interview (Siyasat Ki Baat with RK Yadav video 6:00 minutes), talked about RAW agents with "suitcases and cupboards full of money".

Current National Security Advisor has talked about RAW recruiting terrorists with one-and-a-half times the money they are making from other sources.

RK Yadav has, in his book "Mission R&AW", written about RAW money paid to late Pakistani politician Khan Abul Wali Khan in 1970s. He's also confirmed the existence of RAW-inspired 1960s Agartala Conspiracy that recruited Shaikh Mujib ur Rehman's Awami League to work for Indian intelligence.

More recently, London Police documents have revealed the testimony of MQM leaders Muhammad Anwar and Tariq Mir confirming that Altaf Husain received money from Indian intelligence.

Ex RAW chief A.S. Dulat has said "money goes a long way in Kashmir" intelligence operations. Part of the money, it seems, is now flowing though the " RAW's media directors" and their "media assets" as described by Professor Tekwani in "Media and Conflict Reporting in Asia".

Pakistani Media:

Pakistani media has grown from about 2,000 journalists in the year 2000 to nearly 20,000 of them now. Rapid growth has meant that many of them are inexperienced and naive. Some of them pick up the planted stories from India and publish them. Others lack conscience and do it for money.

Summary:

Indian media is abuzz with anti-Pakistan stories fabricated by "RAW's media directors" and planted by their "media assets" described by Professor Shyam Tekwani in his book "Media and Conflict Reporting in Asia" . These stories are part of Indian government's campaign to slander Pakistan to achieve the following objectives:

1. Deflect world attention from Indian Army atrocities in Kashmir.

2. Cover up India's proxy war of terror in Pakistan.

3. Isolate Pakistan internationally.

4. Sabotage China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

It's important for Pakistanis to not only understand what India is doing but also make a serious effort to make the world aware of it.


Related Links:

Haq's Musings

Noam Chomsky on Indian Media

700,000 Indian Soldiers Vs 10 Million Kashmiris

Modi's Covert War in Pakistan

ADB Raises Pakistan GDP Growth Forecast

Gwadar as Hong Kong West

China-Pakistan Industrial Corridor

Indian Spy Kulbhushan Yadav's Confession

Ex Indian Spy Documents RAW Successes Against Pakistan

Saleem Safi of GeoTV on Gwadar

Pakistan FDI Soaring with Chinese Money for CPEC


http://www.riazhaq.com/2016/10/planted-stories-in-indian-media.html
 
. .
1. Deflect world attention from Indian Army atrocities in Kashmir.

2. Cover up India's proxy war of terror in Pakistan.

3. Isolate Pakistan internationally.

4. Sabotage China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Hence the main crux. India may have been successful in so called "isolating" Pakistan in SAARC but on the contrary it has made itself a laughing stock in the world. Mr Modi and Doval led gang is taking desperate measures to come up with some result but so far all their egg had been thrown back at them.
 
.
We all know how Bollywood masala addicted Indian public needs some sensational stuff. They'll buy anything, if it is against Pakistan.

Look at the "SirGKal" fiasco. There are actually many Indians who have started to believe in that.

On our side, we have to see some media outlets, especially GEO, DAWN and Tribune which are being funded from outside (first two directly from India, RAW?)and doing everything to sabotage national security..
 
.
This latest Dawn episode could be R&AW work, I mean the civilian government is spooked and offering clarification one after another. And now the govrenment has decided to hunt down the journalist, Indian propaganda machinery will try to exploit this situation to the maximum.
 
.
As usual excellent work sir, I think a lot of RAW trolls are on pdf too...paid on daily wages to do the trolling and propaganda by creating multiple IDs with false flags but essentially uttering the same crap.
 
.
Pakistani media has grown from about 2,000 journalists in the year 2000 to nearly 20,000 of them now. Rapid growth has meant that many of them are inexperienced and naive. Some of them pick up the planted stories from India and publish them. Others lack conscience and do it for money.
i dont agree this point specially because editors are not the persons who just run any news coming from any source, contrary they first check facts, sources, counter checks etc before giving nod for any report because they know how would any news be translated if given without certain truth to be based upon. no every tom , dick and harry can get any news run on any platform. as far editors` experience is concerned then i bet they wander in the field for many years before employed as an editor.
as far as propaganda is concerned the it is the most employed and important tool for anyone in power. thing is how do we sift through it.
 
.
i dont agree this point specially because editors are not the persons who just run any news coming from any source, contrary they first check facts, sources, counter checks etc before giving nod for any report because they know how would any news be translated if given without certain truth to be based upon. no every tom , dick and harry can get any news run on any platform. as far editors` experience is concerned then i bet they wander in the field for many years before employed as an editor.
as far as propaganda is concerned the it is the most employed and important tool for anyone in power. thing is how do we sift through it.

it is easy to plant stories when your military and politicians have skeletons to bury

the rapid growth of media, internet and electronic media has made it difficult to control information
 
.
it is easy to plant stories when your military and politicians have skeletons to bury

the rapid growth of media, internet and electronic media has made it difficult to control information
yeah iagree but i am talking about the papers and electronic media where things can be manipulated but it also need some stories based upon certain credible sources. like Indian media run the stories of surgical strike based on the sources which every Indian believes in. i-e your DGMO.
 
.
yeah iagree but i am talking about the papers and electronic media where things can be manipulated but it also need some stories based upon certain credible sources. like Indian media run the stories of surgical strike based on the sources which every Indian believes in. i-e your DGMO.

where do you think "Indians" get their news from ??
 
.
as i said that from certain credible sources but i did not say that these credible sources are credible for the other country as well. i was pointing out in Pak scenario where author says Pak media gets certain stories from unreliable sources. because if any news concerning National security cant be published without credible evidence from the credible sources.ow credibility changes from country to country, situation to situation.
Indian media run the surgical strike story because of two facts 1st is your DGMO credibility in your circles and 2nd because people wanted to hear that and no pressure could mount on your media because of majority demand.
 
.
Excerpt from "Studies in Intelligence, Journal of the American Intelligence Professional" December 2009:

"The Indian government put few restrictions on the influx of Soviet journalists, and in the 1980s more than 150 KGB and GRU (military intelligence) officers served on the subcontinent. Many of them were busy planting biased or false stories in the Indian papers. According to KGB archivist and defector Vasili Mirokhin, the KGB planted 5,510 stories in this way in 1975 alone and controlled 10 Indian newspapers and one news agency. KGB officers boasted to one another that there was no shortage of Indian journalists and politicians willing to take money."


https://books.google.com/books?id=X...nepage&q=planted stories indian media&f=false
 
.
The growing cancer of paid news in Indian media:

The media being infected with a 'cancer called paid news' is an issue debated many a time. During this year's Maharashtra assembly elections, this cancer magnified so grievously that, if not dealt with immediately, it could end the media's credibility.

Akin to the Lok Sabha elections earlier this year, the BJP led the race in marketing and advertising. But this time around, the party was not content with front page advertisements in newspapers. It went a step further. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech at New York's Madison Square Garden was telecast across all Marathi news channels during prime time. BJP leaders conceded they had to pay up to Rs 20 lakh per episode, which means the whole deal cost them in crores. The moot question, however, is: should the media sell its prime time slot, which is globally reserved only for news, to a political party?

BJP leader Vinay Sahastrabudhe said in a television debate the party went ahead with the plan only after a green signal from the Election Commission (EC). But the Congress has lodged a complaint with the EC, demanding it be regarded as paid news, followed by strong action against it.

What is exactly paid news? An advertisement disguised as editorial is paid news. Published content and TV news is taken seriously, hence political parties plant stories in the media, promoting its candidate. The transaction, obviously, happens in cash.

In this case, however, there was nothing opaque about the way BJP went about its business. It bought the prime time slot legally, and openly advertised about it. In fact, the whole issue was highlighted because of their ad. Morally, it should have been avoided. But the real culprits are the editors who sold their conscience just because a political party was willing to buy it. Some channels stooped so low, they did not even disclose the fact that it was an ad, thereby deceiving its viewers. According to TRAI regulations, TV channels are not supposed to exceed the limit of 10 minutes of advertisements per 30 minutes. One must scrutinise if the channels have disregarded this regulation.

This episode has given birth to several issues. Should a PM's address, during his official visit as the leader of a country, be reduced to election campaigning? According to the BJP, it was a private program. But one should not forget Modi was representing India while in the US. Has the EC rule been undermined? The EC must come up with a well thought out decision because one of its regulations insinuates that the PM, CM or any minister's address as an official should not be used for party campaigning.

The second and more important question is about the freedom of the media and viewers. Management selling editorial slots is an attack on the soul of journalism. Gradually, ads have settled themselves on newspapers' front pages. Showing an 'ad disguised as speech' during the 9.00pm slot is an attack on the editorial right as well as viewers' right to watch news, isn't it? It is no secret that hundreds of crores are required to sustain a channel. But if this trend continues, it will injure journalism fatally. Is it a deliberate conspiracy by vested interests?

Because if a watchdog collapses, everyone is free to do anything.

There is no point projecting this issue as 'the BJP vs Congress'. The foundations of paid news were laid during the Congress regime. Former CM Ashok Chavan's case is a well-known example. Today, the Congress is going hammer and tongs against the BJP, but what are the odds of Congress not doing the same when the tables are reversed? If all the biggies keep this money game alive and kicking, what will happen to small political parties, which do not have such money power? How does our democracy remain a level playing field then?

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-the-growing-cancer-of-paid-news-2026829
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom