What's new

Rare discovery pushes back Iron Age in India

Levina

BANNED
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
15,278
Reaction score
59
Country
India
Location
United Arab Emirates
This is a remarkable discovery!!!
It means two things
1) The iron age which could 've begun anywhere before 2200 BCE coincides with the mature harappan period of 2600–1900 BCE, this is the time when SSC,Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation (aka Indus valley civilisation) was at its peak.
So far it was believed that the inhabitants of SSC used bronze age tools.
2) An Iron find in the Deccan indicates indigenous origins.. It also means that the ppl who had migrated to central part of India picked up the technology from deccan.

The article......
Rare discovery pushes back Iron Age in India

HYDERABAD: Iron Age may have come into existence in Telangana much before the rest of the world. At least that's the conclusion reached by archaeologists excavating the University of Hyderabad campus who found iron artefacts dating back to roughly 2,200 BC.

The team of archaeologists, led by professor KP Rao, has found several artefacts, including small knives and blades besides earthen pots. "The implements that were found were tested at the National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) using a method called Optically Simulated Luminescence (OSL). The metal objects were dated to anywhere between 1800 BC and 2,400 BC. So we are assuming they were made during 2200 BC," Prof KP Rao told TOI.

This, he said, predates the existing understanding about the advent of the Iron Age in the country. Worldwide, experts have put the dawn of the age around 1200 BC, marking the time when humans started exploiting metals to make basic tools.

"In India, it was understood that the Iron Age came into being around 1,800 BC in the Lahuradeva site in Uttar Pradesh. But this latest development shows that the Iron Age started much before that, at least in our country," Rao said.

"It only goes to show that our ancestors had a rudimentary yet good knowledge about wielding weapons made of metals. We had estimated that the only metal that was moulded was copper, but due to its scarce nature it was not a feasible option. The idea of using abundant iron ore for tools and weapons is a landmark achievement," he added.

The idea of using iron has only come to lead to more and more developments. "It is because of their advancements did we reach the space-age," he said.

Currently, archaeologists have excavated 25 burial sites in the UOH area and the samples have been subjected to DNA analysis.

@anonymus @thesolar65 @OrionHunter @SrNair and others :)
 
What could be the suitable professional title for you?

Tomb raider? Dirt doctor? Anthro-polo-freakin-gist ? History hunter? :azn:

Or simply Jurassic auntie. :omghaha:
 
Jurassic auntie!!! :angel:

I prefer being among dinosaurs of jurassic than a few galoots of modern age. :coffee:
I however fail to see those dinosaurs paying much attention to your discussion about National interest, Historical findings and even your sarcasm, Unlike few galoots of modern age who actually listen to you. :azn:
 
I however fail to see those dinosaurs paying much attention to your discussion about National interest, Historical findings and even your sarcasm, Unlike few galoots of modern age who actually listen to you. :azn:
Sweetie...buzz off!
Either you contribute to this thread or you dont. But I dont want anyone taking this thread in a tangential direction. Capisce?
 
This is a remarkable discovery!!!
It means two things
1) The iron age which could 've begun anywhere before 2200 BCE coincides with the mature harappan period of 2600–1900 BCE, this is the time when SSC,Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation (aka Indus valley civilisation) was at its peak.
So far it was believed that the inhabitants of SSC used bronze age tools.
2) An Iron find in the Deccan indicates indigenous origins.. It also means that the ppl who had migrated to central part of India picked up the technology from deccan.

The article......
Rare discovery pushes back Iron Age in India

HYDERABAD: Iron Age may have come into existence in Telangana much before the rest of the world. At least that's the conclusion reached by archaeologists excavating the University of Hyderabad campus who found iron artefacts dating back to roughly 2,200 BC.

The team of archaeologists, led by professor KP Rao, has found several artefacts, including small knives and blades besides earthen pots. "The implements that were found were tested at the National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) using a method called Optically Simulated Luminescence (OSL). The metal objects were dated to anywhere between 1800 BC and 2,400 BC. So we are assuming they were made during 2200 BC," Prof KP Rao told TOI.

This, he said, predates the existing understanding about the advent of the Iron Age in the country. Worldwide, experts have put the dawn of the age around 1200 BC, marking the time when humans started exploiting metals to make basic tools.

"In India, it was understood that the Iron Age came into being around 1,800 BC in the Lahuradeva site in Uttar Pradesh. But this latest development shows that the Iron Age started much before that, at least in our country," Rao said.

"It only goes to show that our ancestors had a rudimentary yet good knowledge about wielding weapons made of metals. We had estimated that the only metal that was moulded was copper, but due to its scarce nature it was not a feasible option. The idea of using abundant iron ore for tools and weapons is a landmark achievement," he added.

The idea of using iron has only come to lead to more and more developments. "It is because of their advancements did we reach the space-age," he said.

Currently, archaeologists have excavated 25 burial sites in the UOH area and the samples have been subjected to DNA analysis.

@anonymus @thesolar65 @OrionHunter @SrNair and others :)

Indian History is way older then you think.

Kumari Kandam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to them this is age of last ice age
 
This is a remarkable discovery!!!
It means two things
1) The iron age which could 've begun anywhere before 2200 BCE coincides with the mature harappan period of 2600–1900 BCE, this is the time when SSC,Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation (aka Indus valley civilisation) was at its peak.
So far it was believed that the inhabitants of SSC used bronze age tools.
2) An Iron find in the Deccan indicates indigenous origins.. It also means that the ppl who had migrated to central part of India picked up the technology from deccan.

The article......
Rare discovery pushes back Iron Age in India

HYDERABAD: Iron Age may have come into existence in Telangana much before the rest of the world. At least that's the conclusion reached by archaeologists excavating the University of Hyderabad campus who found iron artefacts dating back to roughly 2,200 BC.

The team of archaeologists, led by professor KP Rao, has found several artefacts, including small knives and blades besides earthen pots. "The implements that were found were tested at the National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) using a method called Optically Simulated Luminescence (OSL). The metal objects were dated to anywhere between 1800 BC and 2,400 BC. So we are assuming they were made during 2200 BC," Prof KP Rao told TOI.

This, he said, predates the existing understanding about the advent of the Iron Age in the country. Worldwide, experts have put the dawn of the age around 1200 BC, marking the time when humans started exploiting metals to make basic tools.

"In India, it was understood that the Iron Age came into being around 1,800 BC in the Lahuradeva site in Uttar Pradesh. But this latest development shows that the Iron Age started much before that, at least in our country," Rao said.

"It only goes to show that our ancestors had a rudimentary yet good knowledge about wielding weapons made of metals. We had estimated that the only metal that was moulded was copper, but due to its scarce nature it was not a feasible option. The idea of using abundant iron ore for tools and weapons is a landmark achievement," he added.

The idea of using iron has only come to lead to more and more developments. "It is because of their advancements did we reach the space-age," he said.

Currently, archaeologists have excavated 25 burial sites in the UOH area and the samples have been subjected to DNA analysis.

@anonymus @thesolar65 @OrionHunter @SrNair and others :)


Means we had a more advanced civilization in the Deccan area and also perhaps South Indian region.

It would be a coincidence but the migration of proto elamites to Indian subcontinent is extremely possible.
It was the only advanced civilization that preceded this ,around BC 7000.


An already advanced civilization can mature Iron tech Means we already had an advanced civilization in Deccan ,possible successors of Proto Elamites.
 
You are wrong again. You find it out and if not then i will tell you later
Okay so i guess you dont believe in continental drift.

Means we had a more advanced civilization in the Deccan area and also perhaps South Indian region.

It would be a coincidence but the migration of proto elamites to Indian subcontinent is extremely possible.
It was the only advanced civilization that preceded this ,around BC 7000.


An already advanced civilization can mature Iron tech Means we already had an advanced civilization in Deccan ,possible successors of Proto Elamites.
From the looks of it, yes, we might have had an advanced civilisation in Deccan.
 
You are wrong again. You find it out and if not then i will tell you later
.Nope you are wrong.
Dr Spencer wells researches proved that theory.
Two migrations was happened in Subcontinent.First one was through Coastal India to Australian Continent.Another one was from Middle East to Central India.
Tribals in our region still have that perfect Negroid features.
 
Jurassic auntie!!! :angel:

I prefer being among dinosaurs of jurassic than a few galoots of modern age. :coffee:

Levina Apa when she doesn't get food on time :whistle: :-

dilophosaurus-gif[1].gif

 
Okay so i guess you dont believe in continental drift.


From the looks of it, yes, we might have had an advanced civilisation in Deccan.


er research has cast doubt on the genetic bottleneck theory. For example, ancient stone tools
in southern India were found above and below a thick layer of ash from the Toba eruption and were very similar across these layers, suggesting that the dust clouds from the eruption did not wipe out this local population.[37]
[38]
[39]
Additional archaeological evidence from Southern and Northern India also suggests a lack of evidence for effects of the eruption on local populations, leading the authors of the study to conclude, "many forms of life survived the supereruption, contrary to other research which has suggested significant animal extinctions and genetic bottlenecks".[40]
However, evidence from pollen analysis has suggested prolonged deforestation in South Asia, and some researchers have suggested that the Toba eruption may have forced humans to adopt new adaptive strategies, which may have permitted them to replaceNeanderthals
and "other archaic human species".[41]
This has been challenged by evidence for the presence of Neanderthals in Europe and "Homo floresiensis
" in Southeastern Asia who survived the eruption by 50,000 and 60,000 years, respectively




This is para from the Wiki explaining an UltraPlinian range Supervolcanic eruption happened in Indonesia,around 74000 years ago :coffee:


Toba catastrophe theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Back
Top Bottom