OrionHunter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,818
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Straw man arguments. You kept harping that there's no proof of Pakistani involvement in Kashmir. I've given you enough. Zaki Ul Rehman of the LeT and seven of his lieutenants are in Pak jail. For what?After reading your response, it is quite clear that you are the one in need of reading up and might i suggest reading from a Non Biased Source instead of the propaganda that is churned out by your Propaganda Machinery.
I for one will admit that it was a policy failure on our part that we created these groups and considered them 'Strategic Assets'. There is no doubt about it, but i asked you whether you have proof or not? This is how the world of espionage works, you don't leave any trails of proof.
If you had any proof, you would have taken that to the SC and would have Pakistan declared a terrorist state. Although the Indian Foreign Office tried its utmost best in the 90's, it was never able to acquire a smoking gun to implicate Pakistan with LET. But at-least, we admit are shortcomings and are working on correcting those mistakes while you people even refuse to admit that elements within RAW have supported Anti State Elements inside Pakistan. Do you need a refresher course that it was India which started this whole concept of supporting Anti State Groups in other countries. It is the only country in South Asia that has used covert and overt means to change the political landscape of other neighbouring countries. Oh wait, you Indian's don't like to talk about these topics. HYPOCRITES
Afghanistan was an absolute clusterf*** during the early 90's. The only thing we wanted was a stable border on our West which we had till 9-11 happened. The last thing we wanted was to send our Army to expel invaders like we did during the early 60's. It might look like a bad policy now, but during the 90's Taliban were our best option for a secure and stable border.
True, but where is the proof? This policy was long abandoned and Musharraf played a key role in reigning in these groups operating from Kashmir. There was a consensus among the General Staff after Kargil that an armed conflict cannot alter the balance of power. Thus, a decision was taken to abandon these groups from State sponsorship.
Good, but can you link these back to Pakistan? If you can, than i suggest that you take this proof and present it in-front of the GA and SC. Surely you wouldn't have any problems having Pakistan declared a 'Terrorist Nation'.
It is baffling how you are not even willing to acknowledge your nations role in destabilizing Pakistan through Afghanistan. I had the honour of having lunch with an Officer who was a CO during the operation conducted in Bajaur in 2010. He stated that several high ranking TTP members captured confessed during interrogation that they received money and weapons from Indian sources based in Afghanistan. This is right from the horse's mouth, it does not get anymore credible than this.
We have tried our best to reign them down, this is why violence has gone down in Kashmir. Hope you can return us the same courtesy.
Indeed, and after reading your amateurish fanboy response, i don't even wanna know you.
Good Day
So in the same vein I ask you, do YOU have any proof of Indian involvement in Pakistan? No! So don't keep shooting from the hip.
Secondly, where the history and the objectives of the LeT/JuM are concerned, can you provide me a link to the sources you consider 'Non Biased' instead of the propaganda dished out by your Propaganda Machinery like the ISPR and your Mullah brigade?