What's new

Raheel shareef has done which was impossible for nawaz shareef

But Pakistan never knew when to stop they continued to the bitter end until 9/11. Still some idiots like addicts continue to support them. It is time to clean up Pakistan of all the militants especially Talibans and sectarian militants financed by the Saudi Wahhabis.

And that was wrong? Everyone left Afghanistan in ruins after the war; no aid no nothing, we were rebuilding Afghanistan. Taliban WAS Afghanistan.
 
The Army Chief must not be running Pakistan's Foreign policy !!! Raheel could retire and run for election and after being elected he could be appointed Pakistan's Foreign Minister.

Who then, the foreign ministry ? which didn't have a full time foreign minister for the last two years. They same headless foreign ministry that advised PM to visit modi to congratulate him in India, only to be shunned. Lets face it, Civilians are awfully shorthanded and lack the insight when it comes to foreign affairs.
Btw are you by any chance an Afghan living here ?

Has USA changed any of its policies in the region?

Do you actually believe that the Americans would change their entire AFPAK policy at behest of one meeting from COAS. Policy changes gradually not instantaneously. To point out any example, just a few years ago the US never took talks with the taliban seriously due to their old notion "We wont negotiate with terrorists". Now they want us to bring them to the table.
 
The army head has the character to lead Pakistan , as a Prime Minister or President , no doubt

I would prefer that the civilian structure is removed once and for all , get rid of this democracy which does not works in Pakistan

Character of General was impeccable when he got appointed

Also Army has served the nation well

However the reality is that Pakistan has suffered due to Corruption and Bad governance
Projects are allocated which are never completed with out , hike in price or rates or overrun
 
Do you actually believe that the Americans would change their entire AFPAK policy at behest of one meeting from COAS. Policy changes gradually not instantaneously. To point out any example, just a few years ago the US never took talks with the taliban seriously due to their old notion "We wont negotiate with terrorists". Now they want us to bring them to the table.

Yes, that is correct. So what is it exactly is that General "Raheel Shareef has done which was impossible for Nawaz Shareef" as the title claims breathlessly, when they both have had zero impact on actual policy?
 
Yes, that is correct. So what is it exactly is that General "Raheel Shareef has done which was impossible for Nawaz Shareef" as the title claims breathlessly, when they both have had zero impact on actual policy?

Yes, the title is non-nonsensical. Its not like Raheel Sharif has somehow poached the foreign ministry from NS, he is just filling the void and he has been good at it aswell. The way Raheel Shareef courted Ghani after the APS incident, getting him to revoke his then hostile stance was something NS could not have achieved. Then it was Raheel Shareefs visits to Moscow that paved the way for the government to make deals with the Russians. RS has been more of an opening batsman , which has many times made Nawaz look like a tail ender.
 
Yes, the title is non-nonsensical. Its not like Raheel Sharif has somehow poached the foreign ministry from NS, he is just filling the void and he has been good at it aswell. The way Raheel Shareef courted Ghani after the APS incident, getting him to revoke his then hostile stance was something NS could not have achieved. Then it was Raheel Shareefs visits to Moscow that paved the way for the government to make deals with the Russians. RS has been more of an opening batsman , which has many times made Nawaz look like a tail ender.

Yes, a COAS trying to act as a foreign and defense minister in DC is just as comical as a bald Chief Minister (at that time) playing cricket at Lawrence Gardens, surrounded by their respective sycophants. Both are painfully sad spectacles to watch.
 
Yes, a COAS trying to act as a foreign and defense minister in DC is just as comical as a bald Chief Minister (at that time) playing cricket at Lawrence Gardens, surrounded by their respective sycophants. Both are painfully sad spectacles to watch.

I don't care if their sad to watch, as long as they get the job done. Unfortunately their is no utopia out there. Lets take the US as an example, many people say that the passing of the Patriot act was equal to ripping apart the Bill of rights and how Thomas Jefferson would be rolling in his grave. However, it was the patriot act that really made it harder for terrorists to operate in the states. Militarization of foreign policy isnt a local phenomena either, do you remember the troop surge in Afghanistan in 2010 and how the pentagon influenced the Obama administration to sanction the move.

Comparing our country to others will prove futile for you. You cant import an entire political system, instead you must have one tailor made for your country.
 
The Army Chief must not be running Pakistan's Foreign policy !!! Raheel could retire and run for election and after being elected he could be appointed Pakistan's Foreign Minister.

There is a law of mother nature. Vacuum will always be filled, same happened in case of Afghanistan. We never enjoyed fighting in Afghanistan. Pakistan did what it did because there was no one there to take care of the state. The menace of BLA-likes since 50s, communism during 70s & 80s and then lately TTP as seeping into our territories each time ... Pakistan fought it its way without invading and will keep doing so as long as you keep producing Hindu-Zinoist Presidents in Afghanistan. The Afghans drop the ball every time and then expect us to as well by letting a goofy PM take up the the national policy. BTW Nawaz is the FM himself why doesnt he enforce his role if he has fire in his belly.

Besides all this i agree with your narrative on Afghan migrants that they should generally be treated with respect and the ones bad mouthing us or involved in illegal activities should be sent back home.
 
Last edited:
He is weakening the democratic government of pakistan by visiting foreign country and discussing foreign policy which should't be its work.
 
Back
Top Bottom