What's new

Question: How do you evaluate the effectiveness of a monetary policy framework

Mumm-Ra

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Messages
874
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Gents I would appreciate if you guys could give some pointers on this topic or point me in the right direction. My main focus will be evaluating the monetary policy framework of Pakistan. Pakistan does not have a specific monetary policy objective. Instead it has interest rates as intermediate target within a corridor. The State Bank of Pakistan uses this to target inflation, growth and exchange rate.

@Muhammad bin Hamid @Nilgiri @Shotgunner51 @Thəorətic Muslim @ziaulislam
 
.
What Do You Wish To Know Specifically???

When The Government Wishes To Pursue Growth It Pushes Down Interest Rates The Side Effect Of Which Is Inflation.When The Government Wishes To Decrease Inflation,It Increases Mark Up.This Is The Basic.
 
.
Policy should be to make it "Simple" as possible so more Pakistanis would use the system for money transfer and all the 1950 restriction need to be lifted

Open it up like in SWISS financial model move money IN/OUT as you will

Investors should be allowed to bring in cash as they please into Country or Take out back to their country (after paying tax dues)
 
.
What Do You Wish To Know Specifically???

When The Government Wishes To Pursue Growth It Pushes Down Interest Rates The Side Effect Of Which Is Inflation.When The Government Wishes To Decrease Inflation,It Increases Mark Up.This Is The Basic.

I am looking of for a model that will help me evaluate the effectiveness of monetary policy of Pakistan. I know that you can check it by comparing it with inflation, small and large scale manufacturing etc. But I was looking for any specific model that incorporates all the necessary economic variables.
 
.
Paypall doesn't operate from Pakistan, for example. Whole of the money that Pakistanis earn online, lands first in India or UAE, then it is routed to Pakistan through other means. On-line labor loses about 10 - 20 % of what they earn in all this. If you ask financial Einsteins of Pakistan they will really give you headache with the details. But yes, money laundering is allowed through Ayan Ali.
All the Pakistani policies, be it financial, are based on fear. Because when a person is done doing a crime, law enforcers can't put hands on them. So these planners make thing difficult to do. But again Zerdari and Nawaz type of things do, what they want to do. Common people pay the real price of these policies.
Pakistan's basic policy should be based on accountability, not fear(what ever it takes), including financial.
(pardon me if I am off-topic)
 
.
Paypall doesn't operate from Pakistan, for example. Whole of the money that Pakistanis earn online, lands first in India or UAE, then it is routed to Pakistan through other means. On-line labor loses about 10 - 20 % of what they earn in all this. If you ask financial Einsteins of Pakistan they will really give you headache with the details. But yes, money laundering is allowed through Ayan Ali.
All the Pakistani policies, be it financial, are based on fear. Because when a person is done doing a crime, law enforcers can't put hands on them. So these planners make thing difficult to do. But again Zerdari and Nawaz type of things do, what they want to do. Common people pay the real price of these policies.
Pakistan's basic policy should be based on accountability, not fear(what ever it takes), including financial.
(pardon me if I am off-topic)

LOL. Yeah, you went off topic by a large margin.
 
.
Im surprised at you Naiveness
http://www.sbp.org.pk/m_policy/2018/MPS-Jan-2018-Eng.pdf

MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN Page 1 Monetary Policy Statement January 2018 Pakistan’s economic growth is on track to achieve its highest level in the last eleven years. Average headline inflation remains within the forecast range of SBP, but core inflation has continued to increase. Fiscal deficit for H1-FY18 is expected to fall close to the last year’s 2.5 percent. There has been visible improvement in export growth and remittances are marginally higher. However, largely due to high level of imports the current account deficit remains under pressure. The exchange rate adjustment in December 2017 is expected to help ease the pressure on the external front. The progress in the real sector indicates that agriculture sector is set to perform better for the second year in a row. Production of all major Kharif crops, except maize, has surpassed the level of FY17. Similarly, large scale manufacturing (LSM) recorded a healthy broad-based growth of 7.2 percent during Jul-Nov FY18 as compared to 3.2 percent during the same period last year. While there could be some deceleration in LSM growth due to sector specific issues such as sugar, POL and fertilizer, overall industrial activity is likely to remain strong. Benefiting from both infrastructure and CPEC related investments, construction and its allied industries are expected to maintain their higher growth momentum. After incorporating the impact of commodity sector dynamics on the services sector, the real GDP growth is projected to be around 5.8 percent, significantly higher than FY17, but marginally lower than the annual target of 6 percent for FY18. This is largely due to expectations of a below-target wheat crop because of a reduction in area under cultivation. Average headline inflation for H1-FY18 stands at 3.8 percent. Meanwhile, core inflation (non-foodnon-energy) continued to maintain its higher trajectory, and clocked in at 5.5 percent during the first half of the year as compared to 4.9 percent last year. This together with a lagged impact of PKR depreciation and rising international oil prices are likely to increase inflation in the coming months. Taking into account the impact of all these developments, while the average inflation for FY18 is still projected to fall in the range of 4.5 to 5.5 percent, end of fiscal year YoY inflation is likely to inch towards the annual target of 6 percent. Broad money supply grew marginally by 1.9 percent during 1 st Jul-12th Jan FY18.. This is a reflection of the decline in NFA and government efforts to contain expenditures. Higher tax collection and proceeds from the issuance of Sukuk and Eurobond have led to reduction in net budgetary borrowing which stood at Rs. 401.9 billion during 1st Jul-12th Jan FY18 as compared to Rs. 470.4 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year. Moreover, the delay in the sugar crushing season also contributed to a moderation of demand in private sector credit. On the external front, export receipts posted the highest growth in the last seven years of 10.8 percent in H1-FY18 against a reduction of 1.4 percent in H1-FY17. Worker’s remittances also recorded growth (2.5 percent) during the first half of the year as compared to a decline in the same period last year. However, favorable impact of these positives was overshadowed by the continuation of strong growth in imports of goods and services. The current account deficit widened to US$ 7.4 billion during the first half of the year, which was 1.6 times of the deficit during the same period last year. Developments in financial accounts show that one-fifth of this deficit was financed by healthy foreign direct investments inflows, and the rest was managed by the official flows and the country’s own resources. As a result, SBP’s liquid foreign exchange reserves MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN Page 2 witnessed a decline of US$ 2.6 billion since end June 2017 to reach US$ 13.5 billion as of 19th January 2018. Going forward, the PKR depreciation in December 2017, the export package, the lagged impact of adjustments in regulatory duties, favorable external environment, and expected increase in workers’ remittances, will contribute to a gradual reduction in the country’s current account deficit. While increase in international oil prices pose a major risk to this assessment, managing overall balance of payments in near term depends on the realization of official financial flows. Four key factors of Pakistan’s economy have witnessed important changes since November 2017 impinging upon the policy rate decision. Firstly, PKR has depreciated by around 5 percent. Secondly, oil prices are hovering near USD 70 per barrel. Thirdly, a number of central banks have started to adjust their policy rates upwards adversely affecting PKR interest-rate differentials vis-à- vis their currencies. Fourthly, multiple indicators show that the output gap has significantly narrowed indicating a buildup of demand pressures. Based on these developments, MPC is of the view that in order to preempt overheating of the economy and inflation breaching its target rate, this is the right time to make a policy decision that would balance growth and stability in the medium to long term. Accordingly, the Monetary Policy Committee has decided to raise the policy rate by 25 bps to 6.00 percent.
 
.
Well days , alot of Indian Bankers , processing Pakistani money
Pakistan should ensure foreign Banks in Pakistan , do not have Indian person handling Pakistani citizen's confidential data
 
Last edited:
.
Im surprised at you Naiveness
http://www.sbp.org.pk/m_policy/2018/MPS-Jan-2018-Eng.pdf

MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN Page 1 Monetary Policy Statement January 2018 Pakistan’s economic growth is on track to achieve its highest level in the last eleven years. Average headline inflation remains within the forecast range of SBP, but core inflation has continued to increase. Fiscal deficit for H1-FY18 is expected to fall close to the last year’s 2.5 percent. There has been visible improvement in export growth and remittances are marginally higher. However, largely due to high level of imports the current account deficit remains under pressure. The exchange rate adjustment in December 2017 is expected to help ease the pressure on the external front. The progress in the real sector indicates that agriculture sector is set to perform better for the second year in a row. Production of all major Kharif crops, except maize, has surpassed the level of FY17. Similarly, large scale manufacturing (LSM) recorded a healthy broad-based growth of 7.2 percent during Jul-Nov FY18 as compared to 3.2 percent during the same period last year. While there could be some deceleration in LSM growth due to sector specific issues such as sugar, POL and fertilizer, overall industrial activity is likely to remain strong. Benefiting from both infrastructure and CPEC related investments, construction and its allied industries are expected to maintain their higher growth momentum. After incorporating the impact of commodity sector dynamics on the services sector, the real GDP growth is projected to be around 5.8 percent, significantly higher than FY17, but marginally lower than the annual target of 6 percent for FY18. This is largely due to expectations of a below-target wheat crop because of a reduction in area under cultivation. Average headline inflation for H1-FY18 stands at 3.8 percent. Meanwhile, core inflation (non-foodnon-energy) continued to maintain its higher trajectory, and clocked in at 5.5 percent during the first half of the year as compared to 4.9 percent last year. This together with a lagged impact of PKR depreciation and rising international oil prices are likely to increase inflation in the coming months. Taking into account the impact of all these developments, while the average inflation for FY18 is still projected to fall in the range of 4.5 to 5.5 percent, end of fiscal year YoY inflation is likely to inch towards the annual target of 6 percent. Broad money supply grew marginally by 1.9 percent during 1 st Jul-12th Jan FY18.. This is a reflection of the decline in NFA and government efforts to contain expenditures. Higher tax collection and proceeds from the issuance of Sukuk and Eurobond have led to reduction in net budgetary borrowing which stood at Rs. 401.9 billion during 1st Jul-12th Jan FY18 as compared to Rs. 470.4 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year. Moreover, the delay in the sugar crushing season also contributed to a moderation of demand in private sector credit. On the external front, export receipts posted the highest growth in the last seven years of 10.8 percent in H1-FY18 against a reduction of 1.4 percent in H1-FY17. Worker’s remittances also recorded growth (2.5 percent) during the first half of the year as compared to a decline in the same period last year. However, favorable impact of these positives was overshadowed by the continuation of strong growth in imports of goods and services. The current account deficit widened to US$ 7.4 billion during the first half of the year, which was 1.6 times of the deficit during the same period last year. Developments in financial accounts show that one-fifth of this deficit was financed by healthy foreign direct investments inflows, and the rest was managed by the official flows and the country’s own resources. As a result, SBP’s liquid foreign exchange reserves MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN Page 2 witnessed a decline of US$ 2.6 billion since end June 2017 to reach US$ 13.5 billion as of 19th January 2018. Going forward, the PKR depreciation in December 2017, the export package, the lagged impact of adjustments in regulatory duties, favorable external environment, and expected increase in workers’ remittances, will contribute to a gradual reduction in the country’s current account deficit. While increase in international oil prices pose a major risk to this assessment, managing overall balance of payments in near term depends on the realization of official financial flows. Four key factors of Pakistan’s economy have witnessed important changes since November 2017 impinging upon the policy rate decision. Firstly, PKR has depreciated by around 5 percent. Secondly, oil prices are hovering near USD 70 per barrel. Thirdly, a number of central banks have started to adjust their policy rates upwards adversely affecting PKR interest-rate differentials vis-à- vis their currencies. Fourthly, multiple indicators show that the output gap has significantly narrowed indicating a buildup of demand pressures. Based on these developments, MPC is of the view that in order to preempt overheating of the economy and inflation breaching its target rate, this is the right time to make a policy decision that would balance growth and stability in the medium to long term. Accordingly, the Monetary Policy Committee has decided to raise the policy rate by 25 bps to 6.00 percent.

Well days , alot of Indian Bankers , processing Pakistani money
Pakistan should ensure foreign Banks in Pakistan , do not have Indian person handling Pakistani citizen's confidential data

Oh bhaiyo. Koi Khuda ka khauf khao yaar. I was hoping for an answer like this:

2018-03-11.png
 
.
h bhaiyo. Koi Khuda ka khauf khao yaar. I was hoping for an answer like this:

2018-03-11-png.458762
For that you need to refer to Statistical bureau of Pakistan as once you made a policy then you check that all variables are in place every 3 months or Quater the report gets published with effectiveness and future correction measures
 
.
I am looking of for a model that will help me evaluate the effectiveness of monetary policy of Pakistan.

Questions:
1. Research paper? Level of course.
2. Are you looking for evaluation or analysis. One will be subjective the other objective.
3. Monetary policies, in some countries, like Pakistan, change based on the PM's mood other countries change their policies to direct growth in specific industries, react to famine/disasters/war. Most policies are/have to be measured over a period of 5-20 years. Most common is 5-10.
4. Alot of information is "held close to the chest" to protect the ruling party, so at most you'll have barely any information in the recent 5 years that's based on independent analysis.
 
.
Questions:
1. Research paper? Level of course.
2. Are you looking for evaluation or analysis. One will be subjective the other objective.
3. Monetary policies, in some countries, like Pakistan, change based on the PM's mood other countries change their policies to direct growth in specific industries, react to famine/disasters/war. Most policies are/have to be measured over a period of 5-20 years. Most common is 5-10.
4. Alot of information is "held close to the chest" to protect the ruling party, so at most you'll have barely any information in the recent 5 years that's based on independent analysis.

1. Yes, it is for a research paper
2. I am looking for evaluation.
3 & 4. I think I can get relevant data for 5-10 years.

Would definitely appreciate your help on this matter.
 
.
Gents I would appreciate if you guys could give some pointers on this topic or point me in the right direction. My main focus will be evaluating the monetary policy framework of Pakistan. Pakistan does not have a specific monetary policy objective. Instead it has interest rates as intermediate target within a corridor. The State Bank of Pakistan uses this to target inflation, growth and exchange rate.

@Muhammad bin Hamid @Nilgiri @Shotgunner51 @Thəorətic Muslim @ziaulislam

Theoretic muslim summarises the issue well.

I have looked into Pakistan before, the data is simply not really there for a concrete analysis/model like you want to do....but maybe you can find something I overlooked.

IMF itself for example does not project Pakistan economy like it does for other developing countries as a result of this.

Overall effectiveness of Pakistan monetary policy will be largely marked (in no particular order) by its long term inflation rate, long term GCF, economic growth, industrial growth (say 5 year rolling average of those)..... and also by credit rating (of Pak govt bonds etc), CAD % of GDP and also its financial category at the IMF (GDDS or SDDS) to name some major ones.

These are all interconnected to large degree....you can weight them equally to start with (or however you feel appropriate), use the data for each year in time period of note... and score them in a personally developed index you make (have to make sure all/majority of the markers you choose are available for each year)....but of course accepting the limitations (given we dont have access to much more consistent underlying markers to go by and also the analysis of the weight-age will be lacking).

Something much more deeper than that will be difficult to do, this might be a good starting place.
 
.
Theoretic muslim summarises the issue well.

I have looked into Pakistan before, the data is simply not really there for a concrete analysis/model like you want to do....but maybe you can find something I overlooked.

IMF itself for example does not project Pakistan economy like it does for other developing countries as a result of this.

Overall effectiveness of Pakistan monetary policy will be largely marked (in no particular order) by its long term inflation rate, long term GCF, economic growth, industrial growth (say 5 year rolling average of those)..... and also by credit rating (of Pak govt bonds etc), CAD % of GDP and also its financial category at the IMF (GDDS or SDDS) to name some major ones.

These are all interconnected to large degree....you can weight them equally to start with (or however you feel appropriate), use the data for each year in time period of note... and score them in a personally developed index you make (have to make sure all/majority of the markers you choose are available for each year)....but of course accepting the limitations (given we dont have access to much more consistent underlying markers to go by and also the analysis of the weight-age will be lacking).

Something much more deeper than that will be difficult to do, this might be a good starting place.

Thanks for the reply and good to have you back. How about if I change my methodology and go for a qualitative analysis instead of quantitative? I had a discussion on the matter with my professor and he was also inclined towards the qualitative one.
 
.
Thanks for the reply and good to have you back. How about if I change my methodology and go for a qualitative analysis instead of quantitative? I had a discussion on the matter with my professor and he was also inclined towards the qualitative one.

Sure you can do that as well, it may be more inclined to what you want to explore/discuss. I would focus largely on the CAD, inflation rate, overall growth rates (GDP, industry etc) and investment trends (and any other central bank policy results you can think of)....in correlation to Pakistan central bank interventions in interest rates, other interventions and general management (which of course you will have to look into). ...i.e an input/output analysis. If there are white papers released by central bank on its policies/management/objectives...that could very well be the best place to start. Then gather all the data you can from what Pakistan central statistics organisation on the economic markers I mentioned....plus anywhere else you can find them (that records consistently etc)....say UNCTAD, world bank, IMF etc.

Maybe do the inputs first in depth, place the biggest markers on a timeline etc....and then use that to correlate with the results in the economic markers (outputs). Then you can do the same for more external based markers like bond credit rating, IMF economy rating etc if you have time to do it....given this will likely be an important thing for Pakistan economy in the short and mid term fiscally from the looks of things right now.

Would be happy to discuss any specifics you come across. The hard part will be explaining the why and degree of the why (results from the inputs) given the multi variate nature of this problem (i.e esp that its not a closed system and there are non-controlled inputs outside of SBP purview)....but largely from policy perspective that should be largely "baked in" to the cake....given a central bank will take a few years previous data to analyse itself how to react over time policy wise etc.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom