You're using circumstantial evidence, which is next to worthless. Correlation does not imply causation, you simply cannot add two and two together and say it equals twenty-two, that's not how this works.
By the way, you mistranslated it,
منظمه الدوله الاسلامیه means "Organization of the Islamic State" (click the link), and NOT "Organization of the Islamic government".
What I'm about to say, may seem offensive, but please understand that I only say this because I only care about facts: I rely on factual information, I rely on what I can actually use to argue with, in a proper debate; I don't care about circumstantial evidence, nor a cum hoc argument. There is no evidence to suggest what you're saying about AJ is anything more than a conspiracy theory, and a poor one at that.
As harsh as this may see, your argument makes no sense, literally. You're basing your entire argument on a bad translation, a cum hoc argument, and what you believe AJ should have done, instead of what it did. You're adding your own interpretation on what is essentially a straight forward question.
