What's new

Putting Indo-BD Relations in Perspective

chaddi jisney bana nehi sakta, use bhi hasta hey .....

so called indigenous products .:omghaha:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...light-combat-aircraft-project-drdo-chief.html

haha look who is critisizing..you are comparing your scientific capability to India??
Yes sanctions hit LCA program,back in 1998,we didnt have an airworthy engine for LCA and was dependent on GE 404 and our FBW software was evaluated on F16 vista

post sanctions,we developed the fly by software onour own simulators..Our hard work paid off..Fighter pilots have stated It is easier to fly a tejas when compared to a mirage!!

A country that can manufacture cycle rikshaws should not even dare to critisize a modern 4th gen fighter jet program.
 
.
http://ukbdnews.com/...bangladesh.html



Living in a non-Muslim state, a
Muslim does not enjoy any space to practise such tradition. This is
why migration to a non-Muslim state never got appreciation from a true
believer. It has been only justified for security reasons; like the
migration of early Muslims to Ethiopia. Hence, all Muslims are
faith-bound to establish Muslim majority states; then move on to
convert those into Islamic state. Indeed, in 1947, the creation of
Pakistan was deemed as an obligation to address such a basic Muslim
political as well as a spiritual need.


http://www.drfirozma...bangladesh.html

In other words -

some of the duties of muslims include migratng to non-muslim countries, becoming a majority there and making it an islamic state. Ever wondered why that is called an "intolerant" view?
 
.
The truth is: the Hindu-Muslim question in SA was not settled either in 1947 or in 1971. The Hindu's war on the Muslim continues but in phases and dimensions that is beyond the concepts of warfare understood commonly.

yes, muslims fault that they came into SA .. fair ?
 
. .
@BDforever
you are an absolute piece of cr@p
ITER - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The project is funded and run by seven member entities — the European Union (EU), India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States.

Indus 2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SCC.jpg


http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-06-14/kolkata/28199651_1_magnetic-field-superconducting-proton

http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/78878-legendary-nuclear-path-indian-nuclear-program-milestones-2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
you are an absolute piece of cr@p
ITER - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The project is funded and run by seven member entities — the European Union (EU), India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States.
as usual joint project :rolleyes:

not all indigenous tech

As of 2007 the reactor was expected to begin functioning in 2010. As of April 2011, it was expected to be commissioned in 2012.[3]As of July 2012, it was expected to begin operations in 2013.As of February 2013, it was expected to begin operations in September 2014. :angel:
 
.
as usual joint project :rolleyes:

What do you know about ITER project kid??:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:


not all indigenous tech

how do you know??:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:


As of 2007 the reactor was expected to begin functioning in 2010. As of April 2011, it was expected to be commissioned in 2012.[3]As of July 2012, it was expected to begin operations in 2013.As of February 2013, it was expected to begin operations in September 2014. :angel:

We have been operating fast breeder reactors,back from 1985s that is a long time before china...

Indian presence


http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/44366-large-hadron-collider-beaming-success.html

THE PHOTON MULTIPLICITY Detector, an important component of the ALICE detector. Its fabrication was entirely India's responsibility.

THE six experiments that will record events at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are: A Large Ion Collider Experiment (ALICE); ATLAS; the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS); the LHC beauty (LHCb) experiment; the LHC forward (LHCf) experiment; and the TOTal Elastic and diffractive cross section Measurement (TOTEM) experiment. ALICE, ATLAS, CMS and LHCb are installed in four huge underground caverns built around the four collision points of the LHC beams. TOTEM will be installed close to the CMS interaction point and LHCf near ATLAS. There is significant Indian participation in ALICE and CMS.

The participating institutions in ALICE are the Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre (VECC), Kolkata; the Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP), Kolkata; the Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar; the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay; Aligarh Muslim University (AMU); Punjab University, Chandigarh; Jammu University; and Rajasthan University, Jaipur. Participating in CMS are Punjab University; University of Delhi; the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Mumbai; and the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai. While participation in ALICE is led by Bikash Sinha, former Director of the VECC, that in CMS is led by Atul Gurtu of the TIFR.

ALICE is a detector specially designed to analyse lead-ion collisions. When LHC delivers its peak energy of 7 TeV, a lead ion (with 82 protons in its nucleus) will have a total per beam energy of 574 TeV, which means a total energy of 1,150 TeV will be available for ion-ion collisions. At such extreme energies, lead-ion collisions are expected to recreate conditions of extreme temperature and density just after the Big Bang under laboratory conditions. Under these conditions it is believed that the bound constituents of protons and neutrons – quarks and gluons – will break free for a very short time, creating a soup of quarks and gluons. This state of matter is called Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP). The data obtained will allow the study of QGP as it expands and cools and help understand how progressively particles that constitute the matter of our universe arise.

For this purpose, ALICE will carry out a comprehensive study of the hadrons, electrons, muons and photons produced in the collision of heavy nuclei for which its detectors are appropriately designed and tuned. An important component of the ALICE detector is the Photon Multiplicity Detector (PMD), whose fabrication was entirely India’s responsibility. The PMD is a unique detector based on highly granular, honeycomb gas cell detectors consisting of 220,000 cells. India was also responsible for making some parts of the Muon Chamber Arm. The most significant element in the contribution to the muon arm is the design of a pre-amplifier ASIC chip (application-specific integrated circuit chip) called MANAS by the VECC, which was fabricated by Semiconductor Complex Ltd. (SCL), Chandigarh.

Each chip reads data from 16 electronic channels. India has supplied 100,000 MANAS chips for the 1.6 million channels in the muon arm as well as 14,000 chips for all the PMD channels. MANAS being a generic ASIC for high-energy experiments, these chips are also being used in the ongoing STAR experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL).

Though ions will be introduced into the LHC only in a couple of years from now, until such time ALICE will not sit idle. While the primary objective of ALICE is to study strongly interacting matter at extreme energy densities where QGP is expected to form, it will also study proton-proton collisions both as a comparison with lead-lead collisions when they happen and in physics areas where ALICE is competitive with other LHC experiments. Interestingly, of the six experiments, ALICE has come out with the first physics paper using the limited data gathered from the first 284 collision events at 900 GeV that were observed over a period of one hour on November 23. (When the LHC is running at its peak energy and intensity, it will produce 600 million collisions per second.)

ALICE scientists measured the multiplicity of charged particles produced in these proton-proton collisions. Since data of such (low) energy collisions were available from other earlier experiments, ALICE data served to confirm the same as well as validate the model calculations made for the experiment.

CMS is an advanced detector comprising many layers. Consisting of 100 million individual detecting elements, each looking for signatures of new particles and phenomena at 40 million times a second, it is one of the most complex scientific instruments ever constructed. It derives its name from the fact that it is small and compact for its enormous weight of 12,500 tonnes. It is designed specially to detect and measure muon energies and it has a large 13 m x 7 m solenoid coil, the largest and the most powerful ever built, for its huge superconducting magnet around which the detector is built. The magnet has a field of 4 tesla, which is 100,000 times stronger than that of the earth. CMS is designed to see a wide range of particles and phenomena resulting from high-energy collisions at the LHC. The 21 m x 15 m x 15 m detector is like a giant filter, a cylindrical onion, each layer of which is designed to stop, track or measure different particles emerging from proton-proton collisions. Particles emerging from collisions first meet a tracker, made entirely of silicon, which traces their positions as they move through the detector, allowing a measurement of their momenta. While the silicon tracker interferes with the particles as little as possible, the calorimeters in the outer layers are specifically designed to stop the particles in their tracks and provide a measure of their energies.

The next layer is the Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) – made of lead tungstate crystals, a very dense material that produces light when struck – which measures the energy of photons and hadrons. The Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL), which is the next layer, is designed mainly to detect particles made up of quarks. The size of the magnet allows the tracker and calorimeters to be placed inside its coil, thus resulting in an overall compact detector. For the measurement of muon energies, the outer part of the detector, which is the iron magnet “return yoke”, is utilised. It stops all particles except muons and other weakly interacting particles, such as neutrinos, from reaching the muon detectors.

The Indian contribution to CMS includes the fabrication of 1,000 of the 4,300 pre-shower silicon strip detector modules that are attached to the end caps of ECAL and HCAL for discriminating against pions and photons before they deposit energy in the calorimeters. These detectors were developed by BARC and fabricated and tested by Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL). Like MANAS, these strip detectors are generic devices for use in other high-energy experiments as well. Another important contribution is the complete fabrication, installation and commissioning of the Outer Hadron Calorimeter, a supplementary system outside the magnet (but just before the muon detector) to enable total containment of hadronic energy from particle showers in HCAL. It consists of 72 honeycomb panels of scintillation detectors (each 2.5 m x 2 m) with a data read-out system using wavelength shift fibre and hybrid photo diodes. K. Sudhakar of the TIFR was responsible for this part.

A unique method was employed in the construction of the CMS detector. It was designed in 15 separate sections or “slices” that were built on the surface and lowered down ready-made into the cavern 100 m below. This enabled saving valuable time as excavating the cavern and building the detector could go on in parallel. Lowering CMS by means of heavy lifting was a decision that was taken right in the beginning, some 16 years ago, inspired by experiences with Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP). The first lowering took place in November 2006 and the last in January 2008. According to Alain Herve, CMS’s original technical coordinator, the concept of building large objects on the surface and transferring them underground as completed elements is the clear way to go in the future.

CMS has the same physics goals as the other general purpose detector ATLAS, but the two have quite different technical solutions and designs. In a sense, the two are complementary. The chief difference between the two is that while CMS is built around a huge superconducting solenoid, ATLAS has a toroidal configuration. A toroidal configuration can either have an air core or an iron core, and ATLAS has chosen an air core. The tracker in CMS is all silicon whereas in ATLAS it is half silicon and half gaseous detectors. Similarly, while CMS has a solid lead-tungstate calorimeter, ATLAS has a liquid argon calorimeter. “The first thing one actually does in the design of the experiment,” points out Tejinder Virdee of CMS, “is actually to figure out the magnetic field configuration for the measurement of muons. That then determines the rest of the design. We start from the physics and then we have to build these complicated experiments that allow you to get to the physics. Physics determines the performance that you require.”

The data thus gathered by CMS and ATLAS will be used to answer questions such as: What is the universe really made of and what forces act within it? And what gives everything substance or mass? CMS is tuned to measure the properties of previously discovered particles with unprecedented precision as well as discover new particles, such as the Higgs boson, supersymmetric particles and gravitons, and completely new phenomena. The experiments are also expected to throw light on what constitutes dark matter and whether there are more than three dimensions of space. Indeed, CMS and ATLAS will be the two key experiments that will be keenly followed by physicists for their results on the elusive Higgs boson.

R. Ramachandran
 
. .
Thorium catches world's eye post Japanese nuke disaster


Mar 21, 2011, 12.07 PM IST


India's development of thorium for nuclear power generation caught world interest in the light of the blasts at Japan's nuclear power stations. CNBC-TV18�s Sanjay Suri and Anup Gomen report.


India is considered as the world leader in thorium. The Kakrapar-1 reactor located near Surat in Gujarat is the world's first reactor which uses thorium than depleted uranium for vital power generation. Compated to uranium, thorium has less fissile. The nuclear physicists are now looking at thorium as the safer model.

Ian Hore-Lacy from World Nuclear Association said, "India is the only country in the world that develops thorium fuel cycle. The expertise in India is world class and it is applied very rigorously to the safety of nuclear plants in India."

India has about 25% of the world's thorium reserves and is keen to tap thorium for the growing needs of its population," Hore-Lacy added.

Paddy Regan, Professor of Nuclear Physics from University of Surrey said, �India has a population of a billion people and has massive reserves of thorium. India's nuclear programme, based on the thorium cycle, is slightly different. Indian model thorium based reactors seem to be a very sensible way to go."

Pioneering Indian technology using thorium rather than uranium generated new interest around the world. Thorium is considered less efficient but certainly is much safer. In the light of what has happened in Japan, critics are less inclined to dismiss thorium than they were before.

Thorium catches world's eye post Japanese nuke disaster - CNBC-TV18

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/inthenews/2010/Q3/DECCAN-IndiaReadyFBR.jpg







India unveils 'world's safest nuclear reactor'



Indiaunveiled before the international commuity Thursday its revolutionary design of 'A Thorium Breeder Reactor' that can produce 600 MW of electricity for two years 'with no refuelling and practically no control manoeuvres.'


Designed by scientists of the Mumbai-based Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, the ATBR is claimed to be far more economical and safer than any power reactor in the world.

Most significantly for India, ATBR does not require natural or enriched uranium which the country is finding difficult to import. It uses thorium -- which India has in plenty -- and only requires plutonium as 'seed' to ignite the reactor core initially.

Eventually, the ATBR can run entirely with thorium and fissile uranium-233 bred inside the reactor (or obtained externally by converting fertile thorium into fissile Uranium-233 by neutron bombardment).

BARC scientists V Jagannathan and Usha Pal revealed the ATBR design in their paper presented at the week-long 'international conference on emerging nuclear energy systems' in Brussels. The design has been in the making for over seven years.

According to the scientists, the ATBR while annually consuming 880 kg of plutonium for energy production from 'seed' rods, converts 1,100 kg of thorium into fissionable uranium-233. This diffrential gain in fissile formation makes ATBR a kind of thorium breeder.

The uniqueness of the ATBR design is that there is almost a perfect 'balance' between fissile depletion and production that allows in-bred U-233 to take part in energy generation thereby extending the core life to two years.

This does not happen in the present day power reactors because fissile depletion takes place much faster than production of new fissile ones.

BARC scientists say that "the ATBR with plutonium feed can be regarded as plutonium incinerator and it produces the intrinsically proliferation resistant U-233 for sustenance of the future reactor programme."

They say that long fuel cycle length of two years with no external absorber management or control manoeuvres "does not exist in any operating reactor."

The ATBR annually requires 2.2 tonnes of plutonium as 'seed'. Althouth India has facilities to recover plutonium by reprocessing spent fuel, it requires plutonium for its Fast Breeder Reactor programme as well. Nuclear analysts say that it may be possible for India to obtain plutonium from friendly countries wanting to dismantle their weapons or dispose of their stockpiled plutonium.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/25nuke.htm
 
. .
MWO-MW012608.jpg


It did quite effectively before and there is no reason to believe that it will not work in future.

bro , indian themselves posted many articles about weapon failure in PDF , you know that .. i am just referring :cheers:
 
. .
Indus-2 will be a synchrotron radiation source with a nominal electron energy of 2.5 GeV and a critical wavelength of about 4 angstroms.

Bigger synchrotrons are in the pipe line....

''At present, there are four such synchrotrons in the world - Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg, Germany; European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), France; SPring 8 in Japan; and Advanced Photon Source (APS), US. Of these, the high-energy, high brilliance 6 GeV 200mA synchrotron that SINP plans to build is closest to the facility in Germany. It will be 1.4 km in circumference with a 500 m diametre.''

Mega science meet to discuss global lab plan for Kolkata - Times Of India
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom