I often cite UNSCR 1373 as the legal justification for coalition attacks against terrorists in international law. In theory, the same would apply to Pakistani attacks against terrorists in uncontrolled territories in Afghanistan. However, as far as I know Pakistan has yet to cite a complaint about what these territories may be through the 1373 information mechanism. That might be because such territories don't exist or because of Pakistani incompetence, or maybe some other reason I can't think of. My point is: this option can be developed.
one need education to do so sir
Pakistan continually refuses joint patrols of the area, probably the surest way to remedy and prevent border attacks.
Like the U.S. "abandoned" Afghanistan and Pakistan in the 90's after Pakistan did the dirty and undermined the post-occupation Afghan government. What Pakistan doesn't like to acknowledge is that while the U.S. could do this in the 1990s and convince itself no bad results to America itself would follow, there was no way after 9/11 that America could trust Afghanistan in Pakistani clutches ever again.
In a "normal" nation politicians would arrange to ease the situation. But in Pakistan an insubordinate military has final say on such matters and the problem with that is that the military perspective always looks for enemies, probable enemies, possible enemies, and their capabilities to operate against them. That's fine in a "normal" country but to the untrammeled military mind no weapons, no power, is ever enough to provide 100% security from real or imagined threats, only conquest, domination, or control.
I guess she got confused.
Lmao.. which post occupation govt?
Afghan gov't responded that it wasn't really "joint patrols" if the Pakistan side of the border was excluded: https://ariananews.af/afghanistan-reacts-to-pakistans-joint-patrols-posts-offer/
When you go the library or look stuff up on the internet you never look for stuff that puts the lie to the dominant political narrative or your current prejudices, do you? You're going to have to give specific criticisms if you want credibility, at least with me.
What did Pakistan do with Latif Mehsud?
https://ariananews.af/afghanistan-reacts-to-pakistans-joint-patrols-posts-offer/
what biasness ? And what credibility would i seek from a pathetic zionazi who lies through his teeth so shamelessly even Joseph Goebbels would be ashamed?
So is your objection that Afghanistan fields "a hashing army" or that in Pakistan's p.o.v. each country in a joint patrol stick to its own side of the border?
You're going to have to be specific. No specifics, no content.
