Protest on Ramiz Raja's comment intensfies

[Indian Patriot]

Dude fixing is much easier

167*

Forget the thread, watch gayle go crazy. He has hit 6 boundaries in a row 4s and 6s both.

 

[Force-India]

First 3 ball 3 six

 

[Indian Patriot]

Last 5 overs 85 runs. Gayle has scored 38 in the last 7 deliveries he has faced.

 

[Force-India]

Last 5 overs 85 runs. Gayle has scored 38 in the last 7 deliveries he has faced.

190* crazy

Bc ek or 6

 

[Indian Patriot]

Gayle hits 16 sixes and his 8th consecutive boundary in 8 deliveries.

Samuels is on 93 and nobody is interested not even samuels himself.

200 for Gayle

 

[Force-India]

 

[Indian Patriot]

This is a 331* run partnership, a WC record and still 3 overs to go.

 

[Force-India]

This is a 331* run partnership, a WC record and still 3 overs to go.

Not WC record, all time ODI record broken, earlier held by India.

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

Drama queen lol Bengali fans moaning over nothing

I have seen every time they used to call shahid Afridi as shaheed Afridi and nasir jamshaid as naseer jamsheed. We used to laugh on it

 

[doppelganger]

Pakistan break-up was never about language, and the Urdu vs Bangla thing. That was the more politically correct account for a sanitized history. Something many Pakistanis (like Rameez Raja included) till today use a a poorly disguised surrogate proxy for the real thing. Which quite simply is the racial disdain of the fair tall well built Punjabi for the dark slightly chinky short pretty scrawny Bengali. We see it right here on this very forum, so no point in even trying to over rationalize the whole thing. What the Bangladeshis have picked up on is the racial thing. Pronunciation etc. is just for the public consumption part. So yes, in the eyes of Islam all Muslims are equal, regardless of color race ethnicity or nationality, and in the eyes of God (and themselves when it comes to their fabled Ummah) they are one people. But the echoes of 1971 reverbating even today pretty conclusively proved the very superficial lip service to that theory. As did the Partition in 1947 on the basis of the two nation theory. How one can reconcile Islam and the demand for a separate nation, when in fact Islam has no concept of nationhood, is not only beyond me, but seems to me to be an anachronism best left unexplained. Because it cannot be explained.

@DESERT FIGHTER @save_ghenda @Color_Less_Sky @SipahSalar @RAMPAGE @Zarvan @Imran Khan @BDforever @SarthakGanguly @Zebra @levina @third eye @Spring Onion

 

[I.R.A]

Pakistan break-up was never about language, and the Urdu vs Bangla thing. That was the more politically correct account for a sanitized history. Something many Pakistanis (like Rameez Raja included) till today use a a poorly disguised surrogate proxy for the real thing. Which quite simply is the racial disdain of the fair tall well built Punjabi for the dark slightly chinky short pretty scrawny Bengali. We see it right here on this very forum, so no point in even trying to over rationalize the whole thing. What the Bangladeshis have picked up on is the racial thing. Pronunciation etc. is just for the public consumption part. So yes, in the eyes of Islam all Muslims are equal, regardless of color race ethnicity or nationality, and in the eyes of God (and themselves when it comes to their fabled Ummah) they are one people. But the echoes of 1971 reverbating even today pretty conclusively proved the very superficial lip service to that theory. As did the Partition in 1947 on the basis of the two nation theory. How one can reconcile Islam and the demand for a separate nation, when in fact Islam has no concept of nationhood, is not only beyond me, but seems to me to be an anachronism best left unexplained. Because it cannot be explained.

@DESERT FIGHTER @save_ghenda @Color_Less_Sky @SipahSalar @RAMPAGE @Zarvan

Oh man wait for my comment I will have to read 11 pagessssssssssssss, you could have tagged me earlier.

 

[Indian Patriot]

Oye tenu ki hoya? Enjoy the batting performance yaara, forget all rest. Gayle played an awesome innings today.

 

[Zarvan]

Pakistan break-up was never about language, and the Urdu vs Bangla thing. That was the more politically correct account for a sanitized history. Something many Pakistanis (like Rameez Raja included) till today use a a poorly disguised surrogate proxy for the real thing. Which quite simply is the racial disdain of the fair tall well built Punjabi for the dark slightly chinky short pretty scrawny Bengali. We see it right here on this very forum, so no point in even trying to over rationalize the whole thing. What the Bangladeshis have picked up on is the racial thing. Pronunciation etc. is just for the public consumption part. So yes, in the eyes of Islam all Muslims are equal, regardless of color race ethnicity or nationality, and in the eyes of God (and themselves when it comes to their fabled Ummah) they are one people. But the echoes of 1971 reverbating even today pretty conclusively proved the very superficial lip service to that theory. As did the Partition in 1947 on the basis of the two nation theory. How one can reconcile Islam and the demand for a separate nation, when in fact Islam has no concept of nationhood, is not only beyond me, but seems to me to be an anachronism best left unexplained. Because it cannot be explained.

@DESERT FIGHTER @save_ghenda @Color_Less_Sky @SipahSalar @RAMPAGE @Zarvan @Imran Khan @BDforever @SarthakGanguly @Zebra

Islam has concept of nationhood which idiot you that it don't have and we tried to move away from Islamic concept and resulted in breakup of Pakistan, but now still most Bangladeshis call themselves Muslims first than Bangladeshi and Indian dumb actions are making sure of that. Pakistan and Bangladesh issue was more of fight of sources than issue of language or race.

 

[doppelganger]

Islam has concept of nationhood which idiot you that it don't have

Bhai most of my knowledge of Islam is from here only. Many times I have read that Islam does not believe in the modern concept of nationhood. Nor race or color or ethnicity or sectarianism. That it is the Ummah (all muslim people) that is the only acceptable construct. Or the Caliphate. I guess one refers to peoplehood, the other to a political entity, but both are not constrained by national boundaries.

Also the "fight of resources" was no fight. It was one side lording over and controlling resources. Like the same side does with the Baloch today, hence the same resentment. It was not the cause, but one of the effects. And the underlying trend in both was a Punjabi supremacism. Lets call a spade a spade?

 

[Zarvan]

Bhai most of my knowledge of Islam is from here only. Many times I have read that Islam does not believe in the modern concept of nationhood. Nor race or color or ethnicity or sectarianism. That it is the Ummah (all muslim people) that is the only acceptable construct. Or the Caliphate. I guess one refers to peoplehood, the other to a political entity, but both are not constrained by national boundaries.

Yes Islam believes in Muslim Brother hood but there is a Muslim land an land of kufr right now all 57 Muslim although they are under different leaders are considered Muslim land and other part of the world is kufr. Islam is strictly against racism and so called nation hood only based on ethnicity or language Islam nation hood is based on faith in ALLAH and to be loyal slaves of his PROPHET SAW