What's new

Priyanka Chopra gets called a hypocrite in public

.
It is what runs in Trump America ...when anyone asks him about being racist to xyz race he says I have friends from xyz race...

Not saying it is right but she is a overly inflated bimbo following the path of the likes of Trump

Should have been UN's job to look into whom they appoint but I guess only criteria is famous not brains or actual neutrality
 
. .
As if a Unicef Goodwill Ambassador can't have patriotic views. And it takes a major leap of imagination to interpret "Jai Hind" as condoning nuclear war.
So Indian patriotism stems from war mongering?

https://skjbollywoodnews.com/indian-celebrities-under-siege-at-global-platforms/

Take it viral then...show the true face of Indians that they view war as being patriotic not the face of civilised people...such mentality is definitely a security risk for the region.
 
.
Jai hind , jay shereen ram are Hindu terrorism slogans.
No, they are not. Use Google Translate.

So Indian patriotism stems from war mongering?

https://skjbollywoodnews.com/indian-celebrities-under-siege-at-global-platforms/


Take it viral then...show the true face of Indians that they view war as being patriotic not the face of civilised people...such mentality is definitely a security risk for the region.
How is it war mongering?
 
.
Priyanka Chopra heard an earful from a frustrated fan who called her a hypocrite for seemingly advocating for peace ... but clearly choosing sides in the India-Pakistan conflict.

The tense moment went down Sunday in L.A., where Priyanka was attending the Beautycon event and fielding questions from the crowd during a Q&A. A woman, who called herself Ayesha and identified as Pakistani, says it's difficult to hear her talk about humanity, when she clearly feels a certain way about recent violence in her home region.

The woman called Priyanka out for a tweet she posted in February that translated to "Long live India" -- the same day an Indian fighter jet bombed a militant training camp in Pakistan.

She went in on Priyanka, saying ... "So, it was kinda hard hearing you talk about humanity, because as your neighbor -- a Pakistani -- I know you're a bit of a hypocrite." The woman points out that Priyanka is a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, and that in her eyes ... the tweet was encouraging nuclear war against Pakistan.

Security rushed over and yanked the mic away from the woman, but she continued with her thoughts ... saying she was a longtime fan of hers and her Bollywood career.

Priyanka's response has raised some eyebrows, as she asks if the woman is done venting ... and then chastised her for yelling. Before that though, Priyanka said she has many friends from Pakistan, and that war's something she's not really fond of -- but she is patriotic.

Priyanka says we all have to walk a middle ground, but then told the girl not to embarrass herself by making such a scene ... adding, "we're all here for love."

The actress caught flak initially after sending out her tweet, with some calling for her to resign from UNICEF, which many believe is supposed to be neutral in international squabbles.

Priyanka hasn't stepped down -- she's actually being awarded with a humanitarian award later this year by the org.
She try to be Angelina Joulie good will ambassador ...but she can t.

101338image001.jpg
 
.
As if a Unicef Goodwill Ambassador can't have patriotic views. And it takes a major leap of imagination to interpret "Jai Hind" as condoning nuclear war.

You're wrong. As UNICEF ambassador, she can't applaud an act of war. She does not have to and in fact should not applaud an action that will lead to war or an action in defence of illegal and brutal occupation. She should have stayed silent. But as we have seen, it is impossible for bhaktistan's civilian icons to stay quiet/neutral, or even dare I say question their government's policies - which is what media personalities do in mature democratic nations. This is partly due to Hindutva mentality these people willingly adopt, partly due to the inferiority complex of a thousand years of Mughal rule, and partly due to Modi and Shah imposing character assassination and a virtual death sentence on anyone who questions the party line. India has now ONLY one party, and to disobey is suicide.

Americans need to understand that despite the glitz, these brahministanis are still uneducated, mentally imbalanced, terror sympathisers and genocide pushers.
 
.
You're wrong. As UNICEF ambassador, she can't applaud an act of war. She does not have to and in fact should not applaud an action that will lead to war or an action in defence of illegal and brutal occupation. She should have stayed silent. But as we have seen, it is impossible for bhaktistan's civilian icons to stay quiet/neutral, or even dare I say question their government's policies - which is what media personalities do in mature democratic nations. This is partly due to Hindutva mentality these people willingly adopt, partly due to the inferiority complex of a thousand years of Mughal rule, and partly due to Modi and Shah imposing character assassination and a virtual death sentence on anyone who questions the party line. India has now ONLY one party, and to disobey is suicide.

Americans need to understand that despite the glitz, these brahministanis are still uneducated, mentally imbalanced, terror sympathisers and genocide pushers.
Her father was ex military officer. So, you can guess now ...
 
. .
In which universe Jai Hind#Indian Armed Forces = Nuclear war?
 
.
In which universe Jai Hind#Indian Armed Forces = Nuclear war?

So she supported the acts committed by the indian army so what is that ....what india did was an act of war so as she claims to be a peace ambassador she should keep her trap shut and carry on but if she finds it necessary to chat 5hit while being a peace ambassador then she should step down and join the indian government and she can be bjp ambassador and she can then spew vomit everywhere
 
. . .
Targeting a terror camp is not an act of war. You would have a point if she applauded the loss of civilian life.




Where is the evidence that it is a terror training camp?

@Dubious @Arsalan @Horus @WebMaster @WAJsal

This troll is labelling certain places in Pakistan as terrorist training camps with 0 evidence. Is promoting indian attacks on our soil.
 
.
There was no terror camp just cows in a farm
Easy for you to say because you see cows as a piece of meat or source of dairy products often uttering a 'mooooooo' sound but you don't realize that for some these cows have a much higher spiritual value. And please don't judge their sanity because of their beliefs. It is what it is!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom