Practical and tangible steps to bring about structural changes in Pakistan

[AAtish]

You misunderstood my words, for I said :"I only say describe things they way they are (by being realistic and impartial), since pretending otherwise (for me) to mislead the gullible is a type of disservice (that I do not wish to do), only that it is cloaked in noble intentions (since I could easily turn dishonest and not say the things I feel need to be said).

I hope it is clearer now. It seems my English is failing me in communicating effectively, not only with you, but many others here!

I understand, there is a lot going in your mind it seems, you are at a bi-road and trying to decide which to take.. take your time, i'm a calm person, so if i don't understand something which you have said, i'll re-inquire it .. chillaxxx

 

[VCheng]

I understand, there is a lot going in your mind it seems, you are at a bi-road and trying to decide which to take.. take your time, i'm a calm person, so if i don't understand something which you have said, i'll re-inquire it .. chillaxxx

Thank you, but I have been quite clear as to my path for quite some time now. I remain happy to respond to any clarifications as may be needed.

 

[AAtish]

Thank you, but I have been quite clear as to my path for quite some time now. I remain happy to respond to any clarifications as may be needed.

Just a suggestion... re-evaluation is part of life.. do consider it sometime..

Same way as you are asking the Army and ISI to re-evaluate themselves and their approach.. (just to keep the post OT)

Why not implement the same rule on yourself?

Just a thought..

 

[VCheng]

Just a suggestion... re-evaluation is part of life.. do consider it sometime..

Same way as you are asking the Army and ISI to re-evaluate themselves and their approach.. (just to keep the post OT)

Why not implement the same rule on yourself?

Just a thought..

Your thought is appreciated, but if you read my other posts, you will see that I already have stated that I evaluate on a continuous basis and change whatever needs changing as appropriate, just like I say about the ISI (to stay on topic! ).

 

[AAtish]

Your thought is appreciated, but if you read my other posts, you will see that I already have stated that I evaluate on a continuous basis and change whatever needs changing as appropriate, just like I say about the ISI (to stay on topic! ).

How about changing the evaluation criterion from negativity to positivity?

Like instead of what else has gone wrong.. to what is getting right?

How about this approach?.. still evaluating but in a positive way..

Just a suggestion.. and i would recommend to see ISI and PA in the same merit (OT)

 

[VCheng]

How about changing the evaluation criterion from negativity to positivity?

Like instead of what else has gone wrong.. to what is getting right?

How about this approach?.. still evaluating but in a positive way..

Just a suggestion.. and i would recommend to see ISI and PA in the same merit (OT)

Please allow me to clarify: I evaluate ALL evidence and arrive at a conclusion. I have no inclination of allowing any personal prejudice, positive or negative, to seep into the process. I merely state what I conclude impartially. Negativity and positivity are perceptions of the reader over which, by definition, I do not have any control.

See, my processes are not very different that of any secret service, including the ISI's I hope (OT).

 

[AAtish]

Please allow me to clarify: I evaluate ALL evidence and arrive at a conclusion. I have no inclination of allowing any personal prejudice, positive or negative, to seep into the process. I merely state what I conclude impartially. Negativity and positivity are perceptions of the reader over which, by definition, I do not have any control.

See, my processes are not very different that of any secret service, including the ISI's I hope (OT).

Maybe you are perceiving impartiality in your thought process when in fact you are totally partial in your approach, perception relies heavily on the surroundings you are in, and initial prejudice might have played a role in your perceptions, even before you became aware of getting everything judged on your logic. See, nothing is truly impartial, deny it as much as you can but impartiality is a misused term.

You might not be impartial in your approach towards ISI (OT)

 

[VCheng]

Maybe you are perceiving impartiality in your thought process when in fact you are totally partial in your approach, perception relies heavily on the surroundings you are in, and initial prejudice might have played a role in your perceptions, even before you became aware of getting everything judged on your logic. See, nothing is truly impartial, deny it as much as you can but impartiality is a misused term.

You might not be impartial in your approach towards ISI (OT)

I think you would not say that if you knew me better, whether I am talking about the ISI or anything else.